Someone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politics Someone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationLaurauses herhands tospeakLucianagetsexcitedSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather thanananalytical oneSomeonementionedglobalhealth asapolitical (notjusthumanitarian)issueSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystatesGabriellasaidsomethingpolitcallyincorrectSomeonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor".Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Some onereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainableSomeonementionedaccountabilityor lack ofdemocraticoversightSomeone referredto legitimacy orquestioned whogave theFoundationauthoritySomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toa state actorSomeoneargued thatmoney equalsinfluence inglobal politics Someone citeda specificprogram orinitiative fundedby the GatesFoundationLaurauses herhands tospeakLucianagetsexcitedSomeonementionededucation orschooling as anarea ofinfluenceSomeonementionedAfrica as aregion ofimpactSomeone madea normativejudgment(“good,” “bad)rather thanananalytical oneSomeonementionedglobalhealth asapolitical (notjusthumanitarian)issueSomeonecompared theGatesFoundation toan MNC orcorporationSomeoneargued that theFoundation fillsgaps left bystatesGabriellasaidsomethingpolitcallyincorrectSomeonementionedliberalism orinstitutionalcooperation.Someonementionedrealism intheirintervention.Someone broughtup inequality(global ordomestic) as aconsequence theFoundation'sactionsSomeonedefended theFoundation byemphasizingefficiency orexpertiseSomeone usedthe phrase“private actor”or “non-stateactor".Someoneargued that theFoundationundermines ordistorts stateprioritiesSomeone criticizedphilanthrocapitalismor profit-orientedphilanthropy.Some onereferred tosoft power(attraction,ideas, norms)Someonementionedagenda-setting(deciding whatproblemsmatter).Someonequestionedwhether theFoundation’simpact is long-term orsustainableSomeonementionedaccountabilityor lack ofdemocraticoversight

Debate on the impact of the Gates Foundation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
  2. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
  3. Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
  4. Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
  5. Laura uses her hands to speak
  6. Luciana gets excited
  7. Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
  8. Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
  9. Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than ananalytical one
  10. Someonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issue
  11. Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
  12. Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states
  13. Gabriella said something politcally incorrect
  14. Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
  15. Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
  16. Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
  17. Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency o rexpertise
  18. Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-stateactor".
  19. Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
  20. Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
  21. Some one referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
  22. Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
  23. Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable
  24. Someone mentioned accountability or lack of democratic oversight