(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Laura
uses her hands to speak
Someone argued that the Foundation undermines or distorts state priorities
Someone brought up inequality (global or domestic) as a consequence the Foundation's actions
Someone made a normative judgment (“good,” “bad) rather than ananalytical one
Someone defended the Foundation by emphasizing efficiency o rexpertise
Someone questioned whether the Foundation’s impact is long-term or sustainable
Someone used the phrase “private actor” or “non-stateactor".
Someone compared the Gates Foundation to a state actor
Gabriella
said something politcally incorrect
Someone criticized philanthrocapitalism or profit-oriented philanthropy.
Someone mentioned agenda-setting (deciding what problems matter).
Someone argued that money equals influence in global politics
Someonementioned globalhealth as apolitical (not justhumanitarian)issue
Someone argued that the Foundation fills gaps left by states
Someone mentioned education or schooling as an area of influence
Someone mentioned accountability or lack of democratic oversight
Some one referred to soft power (attraction, ideas, norms)
Someone mentioned realism in their intervention.
Someone mentioned liberalism or institutional cooperation.
Someone compared the Gates Foundation to an MNC or corporation
Luciana gets excited
Someone mentioned Africa as a region of impact
Someone cited a specific program or initiative funded by the Gates Foundation
Someone referred to legitimacy or questioned who gave the Foundation authority
