CriticalAppraisalGeneralizabiltyPilotStudyPICOQualityImprovementBestEvidenceSettingSampleSizeValidityPracticeChangeTimeCommitmentOutcomeMeasuresDataCollectionInformedConsentTrustworthinessCorrelationPatientOutcomesQuantitativeStudyResearchUtilizationControlGroupPhenomenologyIntegrativeReviewMixedMethodsReliabilityClinicalGuidelinesEthnographyHypothesisLiteratureReviewWebsitesVariablesResearchArticleAnonymityAHRQHallelujahPainManagementEvidenceHierarchyFalsificationCodingDisseminationQualitativeStudyInclusionResearchDesignObservationLevel IEvidenceInterviewResearchQuestionIRBBenchmarkingRandomizedControl TrialPatientPreferencesMeta-AnalysisDataAnalysisEvidenceBasedPracticeSaturationLevel IIEvidenceBelmontReportPlagiarismImplementationSystematicReviewParticipantClinicalExpertiseBiasNurembergCodeExclusionCriticalAppraisalGeneralizabiltyPilotStudyPICOQualityImprovementBestEvidenceSettingSampleSizeValidityPracticeChangeTimeCommitmentOutcomeMeasuresDataCollectionInformedConsentTrustworthinessCorrelationPatientOutcomesQuantitativeStudyResearchUtilizationControlGroupPhenomenologyIntegrativeReviewMixedMethodsReliabilityClinicalGuidelinesEthnographyHypothesisLiteratureReviewWebsitesVariablesResearchArticleAnonymityAHRQHallelujahPainManagementEvidenceHierarchyFalsificationCodingDisseminationQualitativeStudyInclusionResearchDesignObservationLevel IEvidenceInterviewResearchQuestionIRBBenchmarkingRandomizedControl TrialPatientPreferencesMeta-AnalysisDataAnalysisEvidenceBasedPracticeSaturationLevel IIEvidenceBelmontReportPlagiarismImplementationSystematicReviewParticipantClinicalExpertiseBiasNurembergCodeExclusion

Research - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
  1. Critical Appraisal
  2. Generalizabilty
  3. Pilot Study
  4. PICO
  5. Quality Improvement
  6. Best Evidence
  7. Setting
  8. Sample Size
  9. Validity
  10. Practice Change
  11. Time Commitment
  12. Outcome Measures
  13. Data Collection
  14. Informed Consent
  15. Trustworthiness
  16. Correlation
  17. Patient Outcomes
  18. Quantitative Study
  19. Research Utilization
  20. Control Group
  21. Phenomenology
  22. Integrative Review
  23. Mixed Methods
  24. Reliability
  25. Clinical Guidelines
  26. Ethnography
  27. Hypothesis
  28. Literature Review
  29. Websites
  30. Variables
  31. Research Article
  32. Anonymity
  33. AHRQ
  34. Hallelujah
  35. Pain Management
  36. Evidence Hierarchy
  37. Falsification
  38. Coding
  39. Dissemination
  40. Qualitative Study
  41. Inclusion
  42. Research Design
  43. Observation
  44. Level I Evidence
  45. Interview
  46. Research Question
  47. IRB
  48. Benchmarking
  49. Randomized Control Trial
  50. Patient Preferences
  51. Meta-Analysis
  52. Data Analysis
  53. Evidence Based Practice
  54. Saturation
  55. Level II Evidence
  56. Belmont Report
  57. Plagiarism
  58. Implementation
  59. Systematic Review
  60. Participant
  61. Clinical Expertise
  62. Bias
  63. Nuremberg Code
  64. Exclusion