DisseminationObservationLiteratureReviewBenchmarkingDataAnalysisInclusionDataCollectionPilotStudyWebsitesEthnographyPICOGeneralizabiltyTrustworthinessAHRQPainManagementCriticalAppraisalControlGroupRandomizedControl TrialOutcomeMeasuresPatientPreferencesHypothesisQualitativeStudyMixedMethodsValidityLevel IIEvidenceCodingPlagiarismLevel IEvidenceInterviewSettingEvidenceHierarchyReliabilityExclusionVariablesParticipantBiasFalsificationPracticeChangeClinicalExpertiseInformedConsentBelmontReportIRBHallelujahEvidenceBasedPracticeAnonymityPatientOutcomesMeta-AnalysisResearchDesignPhenomenologyTimeCommitmentBestEvidenceClinicalGuidelinesResearchUtilizationSaturationSystematicReviewImplementationResearchQuestionIntegrativeReviewQualityImprovementCorrelationSampleSizeQuantitativeStudyResearchArticleNurembergCodeDisseminationObservationLiteratureReviewBenchmarkingDataAnalysisInclusionDataCollectionPilotStudyWebsitesEthnographyPICOGeneralizabiltyTrustworthinessAHRQPainManagementCriticalAppraisalControlGroupRandomizedControl TrialOutcomeMeasuresPatientPreferencesHypothesisQualitativeStudyMixedMethodsValidityLevel IIEvidenceCodingPlagiarismLevel IEvidenceInterviewSettingEvidenceHierarchyReliabilityExclusionVariablesParticipantBiasFalsificationPracticeChangeClinicalExpertiseInformedConsentBelmontReportIRBHallelujahEvidenceBasedPracticeAnonymityPatientOutcomesMeta-AnalysisResearchDesignPhenomenologyTimeCommitmentBestEvidenceClinicalGuidelinesResearchUtilizationSaturationSystematicReviewImplementationResearchQuestionIntegrativeReviewQualityImprovementCorrelationSampleSizeQuantitativeStudyResearchArticleNurembergCode

Research - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
  1. Dissemination
  2. Observation
  3. Literature Review
  4. Benchmarking
  5. Data Analysis
  6. Inclusion
  7. Data Collection
  8. Pilot Study
  9. Websites
  10. Ethnography
  11. PICO
  12. Generalizabilty
  13. Trustworthiness
  14. AHRQ
  15. Pain Management
  16. Critical Appraisal
  17. Control Group
  18. Randomized Control Trial
  19. Outcome Measures
  20. Patient Preferences
  21. Hypothesis
  22. Qualitative Study
  23. Mixed Methods
  24. Validity
  25. Level II Evidence
  26. Coding
  27. Plagiarism
  28. Level I Evidence
  29. Interview
  30. Setting
  31. Evidence Hierarchy
  32. Reliability
  33. Exclusion
  34. Variables
  35. Participant
  36. Bias
  37. Falsification
  38. Practice Change
  39. Clinical Expertise
  40. Informed Consent
  41. Belmont Report
  42. IRB
  43. Hallelujah
  44. Evidence Based Practice
  45. Anonymity
  46. Patient Outcomes
  47. Meta-Analysis
  48. Research Design
  49. Phenomenology
  50. Time Commitment
  51. Best Evidence
  52. Clinical Guidelines
  53. Research Utilization
  54. Saturation
  55. Systematic Review
  56. Implementation
  57. Research Question
  58. Integrative Review
  59. Quality Improvement
  60. Correlation
  61. Sample Size
  62. Quantitative Study
  63. Research Article
  64. Nuremberg Code