TrustworthinessCriticalAppraisalFalsificationInterviewBelmontReportBestEvidenceInformedConsentHypothesisMeta-AnalysisClinicalGuidelinesControlGroupBiasResearchArticlePracticeChangeParticipantQuantitativeStudyInclusionPhenomenologyDisseminationPatientPreferencesQualityImprovementSampleSizeTimeCommitmentPlagiarismIntegrativeReviewIRBGeneralizabiltyAnonymityResearchQuestionMixedMethodsClinicalExpertiseHallelujahLevel IEvidenceImplementationLevel IIEvidenceResearchDesignPilotStudyVariablesObservationEvidenceHierarchyDataCollectionSaturationBenchmarkingPatientOutcomesWebsitesSettingCorrelationResearchUtilizationSystematicReviewRandomizedControl TrialPainManagementAHRQCodingExclusionQualitativeStudyReliabilityValidityPICOLiteratureReviewOutcomeMeasuresEvidenceBasedPracticeDataAnalysisNurembergCodeEthnographyTrustworthinessCriticalAppraisalFalsificationInterviewBelmontReportBestEvidenceInformedConsentHypothesisMeta-AnalysisClinicalGuidelinesControlGroupBiasResearchArticlePracticeChangeParticipantQuantitativeStudyInclusionPhenomenologyDisseminationPatientPreferencesQualityImprovementSampleSizeTimeCommitmentPlagiarismIntegrativeReviewIRBGeneralizabiltyAnonymityResearchQuestionMixedMethodsClinicalExpertiseHallelujahLevel IEvidenceImplementationLevel IIEvidenceResearchDesignPilotStudyVariablesObservationEvidenceHierarchyDataCollectionSaturationBenchmarkingPatientOutcomesWebsitesSettingCorrelationResearchUtilizationSystematicReviewRandomizedControl TrialPainManagementAHRQCodingExclusionQualitativeStudyReliabilityValidityPICOLiteratureReviewOutcomeMeasuresEvidenceBasedPracticeDataAnalysisNurembergCodeEthnography

Research - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
  1. Trustworthiness
  2. Critical Appraisal
  3. Falsification
  4. Interview
  5. Belmont Report
  6. Best Evidence
  7. Informed Consent
  8. Hypothesis
  9. Meta-Analysis
  10. Clinical Guidelines
  11. Control Group
  12. Bias
  13. Research Article
  14. Practice Change
  15. Participant
  16. Quantitative Study
  17. Inclusion
  18. Phenomenology
  19. Dissemination
  20. Patient Preferences
  21. Quality Improvement
  22. Sample Size
  23. Time Commitment
  24. Plagiarism
  25. Integrative Review
  26. IRB
  27. Generalizabilty
  28. Anonymity
  29. Research Question
  30. Mixed Methods
  31. Clinical Expertise
  32. Hallelujah
  33. Level I Evidence
  34. Implementation
  35. Level II Evidence
  36. Research Design
  37. Pilot Study
  38. Variables
  39. Observation
  40. Evidence Hierarchy
  41. Data Collection
  42. Saturation
  43. Benchmarking
  44. Patient Outcomes
  45. Websites
  46. Setting
  47. Correlation
  48. Research Utilization
  49. Systematic Review
  50. Randomized Control Trial
  51. Pain Management
  52. AHRQ
  53. Coding
  54. Exclusion
  55. Qualitative Study
  56. Reliability
  57. Validity
  58. PICO
  59. Literature Review
  60. Outcome Measures
  61. Evidence Based Practice
  62. Data Analysis
  63. Nuremberg Code
  64. Ethnography