"You have to ask yourself…" "Further evidence can be found..." Making a claim and then presenting no evidence Religious texts presented as physical fact Asking questions that archaeologists have answered decades ago Presenting known forgeries as evidence Self- congratulatory comment False equivalence The ONLY way it could have been done "Mainstream Archeologists" Bad faith argument Ignoring proven archeological evidence "Some theorists say yes." Quoting prophecies/astrologists as fact Presenting long debunked theories are fact Declaring a baseless claim to be evidence it looks like a thing, therefore it is "We can't do it today" "... or is there another explaination?" Burden of proof fallacy Lying about a guest's credentials Victim complex "And if so…" "Could it be… ?" "You have to ask yourself…" "Further evidence can be found..." Making a claim and then presenting no evidence Religious texts presented as physical fact Asking questions that archaeologists have answered decades ago Presenting known forgeries as evidence Self- congratulatory comment False equivalence The ONLY way it could have been done "Mainstream Archeologists" Bad faith argument Ignoring proven archeological evidence "Some theorists say yes." Quoting prophecies/astrologists as fact Presenting long debunked theories are fact Declaring a baseless claim to be evidence it looks like a thing, therefore it is "We can't do it today" "... or is there another explaination?" Burden of proof fallacy Lying about a guest's credentials Victim complex "And if so…" "Could it be… ?"
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
"You have to ask yourself…"
"Further evidence can be found..."
Making a claim and then presenting no evidence
Religious texts presented as physical fact
Asking questions that archaeologists have answered decades ago
Presenting known forgeries as evidence
Self-congratulatory comment
False equivalence
The ONLY way it could have been done
"Mainstream Archeologists"
Bad faith argument
Ignoring proven archeological evidence
"Some theorists say yes."
Quoting prophecies/astrologists as fact
Presenting long debunked theories are fact
Declaring a baseless claim to be evidence
it looks like a thing, therefore it is
"We can't do it today"
"... or is there another explaination?"
Burden of proof fallacy
Lying about a guest's credentials
Victim complex
"And if so…"
"Could it be… ?"