Yeah what Epistemological framework What modality? Incoherent gibberish Rhetorical backshots Lock in What's the P and not P? Entailment What inference rule are you using? Set theory Hume's problem of induction Necessary and sufficient conditions Ontological What's the inference rule? You're not even tracking Moral proposition Objective Necessary preconditions I grant that Yeah what's going to be the argument for that? Go ahead Transcendental Render the Deductive syllogism I take it to be the case Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q Yeah what Epistemological framework What modality? Incoherent gibberish Rhetorical backshots Lock in What's the P and not P? Entailment What inference rule are you using? Set theory Hume's problem of induction Necessary and sufficient conditions Ontological What's the inference rule? You're not even tracking Moral proposition Objective Necessary preconditions I grant that Yeah what's going to be the argument for that? Go ahead Transcendental Render the Deductive syllogism I take it to be the case Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Yeah what Epistemological framework
What modality?
Incoherent gibberish
Rhetorical backshots
Lock in
What's the P and not P?
Entailment
What inference rule are you using?
Set theory
Hume's problem of induction
Necessary and sufficient conditions
Ontological
What's the inference rule?
You're not even tracking
Moral proposition
Objective
Necessary preconditions
I grant that
Yeah what's going to be the argument for that?
Go ahead
Transcendental
Render the Deductive syllogism
I take it to be the case
Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q