Yeah what's going to be the argument for that? Go ahead Moral proposition What modality? Yeah what Epistemological framework I take it to be the case Lock in Ontological Incoherent gibberish Entailment Set theory Transcendental Necessary and sufficient conditions I grant that What's the P and not P? Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q What inference rule are you using? You're not even tracking Necessary preconditions Hume's problem of induction What's the inference rule? Render the Deductive syllogism Rhetorical backshots Objective Yeah what's going to be the argument for that? Go ahead Moral proposition What modality? Yeah what Epistemological framework I take it to be the case Lock in Ontological Incoherent gibberish Entailment Set theory Transcendental Necessary and sufficient conditions I grant that What's the P and not P? Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q What inference rule are you using? You're not even tracking Necessary preconditions Hume's problem of induction What's the inference rule? Render the Deductive syllogism Rhetorical backshots Objective
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Yeah what's going to be the argument for that?
Go ahead
Moral proposition
What modality?
Yeah what Epistemological framework
I take it to be the case
Lock in
Ontological
Incoherent gibberish
Entailment
Set theory
Transcendental
Necessary and sufficient conditions
I grant that
What's the P and not P?
Yeah so if P then Q, P therefore Q
What inference rule are you using?
You're not even tracking
Necessary preconditions
Hume's problem of induction
What's the inference rule?
Render the Deductive syllogism
Rhetorical backshots
Objective