Some insanelytransphobicarticle or reportgets citedfrequently as if itwere actual lawScoffing at the ideathe suffering oftrans peopledeservesheightened scrutinylike women andracial minorities do“Physical differencesbetween men andwomen, however, areenduring.” UnitedStates v. Virginia, 518U.S. 515, 533 (1996)Trans sportsbans actuallydon’t classifybased ontransgenderstatusSomeone says“anticlassifcationtheory”Bostock is astatutoryinterpretation caseand has nobearing on theEqual ProtectionClause“This is acontroversial issuethat the states shouldbe able to decide forthemselves throughthe political process”RileyGainescomes upSomeonesays“erasingwomen”Alito or Barrettconcurrence inSkrmetti is citedin the majorityopinionSomeonementionsbathroomsThomas sayssomethingbizarre aboutthe SpendingClause andTitle IXRoberts takesthe majorityagain becausehe wants totemperbacklashJacksonsolodissentTitle IX*mandates*discriminationagainst transpeoplePromoting women’ssports is an importantstate interestnotwithstandingStudents for FairAdmission v. Harvard“Biologicalmales”SurprisinglysympatheticconservativejusticeSotomayorlead dissentjoined byKagan andJacksonQuibbling aboutthe history of dejure discriminationagainsttransgenderpeopleTrump’sexecutiveordermentionedSomeone(Thomas)advocates fordoing awaywith tiers ofscrutinyKavanaughwrites abouthowimportantsports areTrump v.Barbara dropsthe same dayto soak upmore mediaattentionSome insanelytransphobicarticle or reportgets citedfrequently as if itwere actual lawScoffing at the ideathe suffering oftrans peopledeservesheightened scrutinylike women andracial minorities do“Physical differencesbetween men andwomen, however, areenduring.” UnitedStates v. Virginia, 518U.S. 515, 533 (1996)Trans sportsbans actuallydon’t classifybased ontransgenderstatusSomeone says“anticlassifcationtheory”Bostock is astatutoryinterpretation caseand has nobearing on theEqual ProtectionClause“This is acontroversial issuethat the states shouldbe able to decide forthemselves throughthe political process”RileyGainescomes upSomeonesays“erasingwomen”Alito or Barrettconcurrence inSkrmetti is citedin the majorityopinionSomeonementionsbathroomsThomas sayssomethingbizarre aboutthe SpendingClause andTitle IXRoberts takesthe majorityagain becausehe wants totemperbacklashJacksonsolodissentTitle IX*mandates*discriminationagainst transpeoplePromoting women’ssports is an importantstate interestnotwithstandingStudents for FairAdmission v. Harvard“Biologicalmales”SurprisinglysympatheticconservativejusticeSotomayorlead dissentjoined byKagan andJacksonQuibbling aboutthe history of dejure discriminationagainsttransgenderpeopleTrump’sexecutiveordermentionedSomeone(Thomas)advocates fordoing awaywith tiers ofscrutinyKavanaughwrites abouthowimportantsports areTrump v.Barbara dropsthe same dayto soak upmore mediaattention

B.P.J. bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
I
2
B
3
I
4
G
5
B
6
O
7
O
8
G
9
N
10
G
11
B
12
N
13
G
14
N
15
G
16
I
17
B
18
O
19
I
20
O
21
N
22
I
23
B
24
O
  1. I-Some insanely transphobic article or report gets cited frequently as if it were actual law
  2. B-Scoffing at the idea the suffering of trans people deserves heightened scrutiny like women and racial minorities do
  3. I-“Physical differences between men and women, however, are enduring.” United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515, 533 (1996)
  4. G-Trans sports bans actually don’t classify based on transgender status
  5. B-Someone says “anticlassifcation theory”
  6. O-Bostock is a statutory interpretation case and has no bearing on the Equal Protection Clause
  7. O-“This is a controversial issue that the states should be able to decide for themselves through the political process”
  8. G-Riley Gaines comes up
  9. N-Someone says “erasing women”
  10. G-Alito or Barrett concurrence in Skrmetti is cited in the majority opinion
  11. B-Someone mentions bathrooms
  12. N-Thomas says something bizarre about the Spending Clause and Title IX
  13. G-Roberts takes the majority again because he wants to temper backlash
  14. N-Jackson solo dissent
  15. G-Title IX *mandates* discrimination against trans people
  16. I-Promoting women’s sports is an important state interest notwithstanding Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard
  17. B-“Biological males”
  18. O-Surprisingly sympathetic conservative justice
  19. I-Sotomayor lead dissent joined by Kagan and Jackson
  20. O-Quibbling about the history of de jure discrimination against transgender people
  21. N-Trump’s executive order mentioned
  22. I-Someone (Thomas) advocates for doing away with tiers of scrutiny
  23. B-Kavanaugh writes about how important sports are
  24. O-Trump v. Barbara drops the same day to soak up more media attention