No clear peer review process Source journal uses free email domains Results too good to be true Invokes conspiracy / suppression Invalid DOI or ISSN Mimics a real journal's website / name Source journal requests payment up front Made up journal metrics Cherry picked evidence Flips the burden of proof Visible typos / odd formatting Missing citations/ sources Clickbait headline Source journal guarantees publication Is trying to sell you something Relies on testimonials, not data "Science proves" Unfalsifiable claim Cites fake awards or metrics Appeals to fear or urgency Overly broad journal scope/title Overuse /misuse of jargon No clear peer review process Source journal uses free email domains Results too good to be true Invokes conspiracy / suppression Invalid DOI or ISSN Mimics a real journal's website / name Source journal requests payment up front Made up journal metrics Cherry picked evidence Flips the burden of proof Visible typos / odd formatting Missing citations/ sources Clickbait headline Source journal guarantees publication Is trying to sell you something Relies on testimonials, not data "Science proves" Unfalsifiable claim Cites fake awards or metrics Appeals to fear or urgency Overly broad journal scope/title Overuse /misuse of jargon
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
No clear peer review process
Source journal uses free email domains
Results too good to be true
Invokes conspiracy / suppression
Invalid DOI or ISSN
Mimics a real journal's website / name
Source journal requests payment up front
Made up journal metrics
Cherry picked evidence
Flips the burden of proof
Visible typos / odd formatting
Missing citations/ sources
Clickbait headline
Source journal guarantees publication
Is trying to sell you something
Relies on testimonials, not data
"Science proves"
Unfalsifiable claim
Cites fake awards or metrics
Appeals to fear or urgency
Overly broad journal scope/title
Overuse /misuse of jargon