Josh and Daviddisagreestrongly on themost tiny detail(see “or rather”vs “rather”)One of ourcrosses isabout whatthe witnessdidn’t doJosh does a randomexercise to prove a point(e.g. taking away thecomputer, answeringevery other question,starting all your answerswith the letter l, havingmultiple witnesses readin unison).7+ quotesget added tothequotebook inone meetingSomeone says“good morningYH” on a Fridayor “goodevening YH ona Sunday”Silence afterrunningsomething for thefirst time and noone’s sure if thecoaches hate itJosh powerpointpresentation thathas us rethinkingeverything wethought weunderstood aboutevidenceDavid gets up to peerat the snacks whilesomeone’s runningsomething and wethink he’s comingtowards us. We quicklystop whispering, whichwe have been doingWe get pizzaapproximatelyonce (if we’relucky)Josh asks whatour theory of thecase is. We spendthe entire practicetalking about it anddo not leave with atheory of the case.RandomspecialguestSomethingexceeds itstime limit by2+ minutes“You can’t moveonce for eachwitness” -David (Orother commentsabout movingduring an openingor closing)Someonemispronouncessomething fromthe case law5.0 forsomething“No onewilted” -David after ascrimmageNotepadthing intheclosing“Someoneput aclock onit.” -DavidJosh will ask what ourmost important fact is,emphasize that that'sthe most important notmaking it catchy. Wewill instead be busywith alliteration andmetaphors and theRule of ThreesWisecrackof Sarah’sfreshmanGarden City“Does thishave a timeproblem?” -David“What do we want torun?” *silence* *Joshmakes a wisecrack(e.g. about howwonderful it is that hisattorneys are soeager to receivefeedback)*Josh makesa moviereferencethat <10% ofthe team getsRoles getswitchedaround (not asmuch as lastyear but still alot)WecrossJosh“Nickelwords notquarterwords” -Joshand/or DavidMichelleresponds toan emailwithin anhour“WHAT?”YOU HAVETO SPEAKUP” - DavidJosh makes tonsof references toalumni we’venever met.Michelle getsnostalgic“You needmultiplearrows inyour quiver”Criticizing thefirst draft of adirect forbeing marriedto the affidavitWe will spend alot of time in ameeting tryingto generate athemeNotes aregiven tothetimekeeper“What youshould insteaddo…is repeatthe question…slower.” -JoshJosh letsMichelle bea witnessand she isthrilledAfter roles aresent out, they telleveryone to cometo the coaches ifthey have anyobjections orcommentsWe pass Davidafter runningsomething, hemouths “goodjob”It will takeus monthsto settle ona themeThecoaches askus a trickquestion“May Iproceed?”*silence* “ohyeah sure goahead” - David“SLOW…DOWN…” -Josh to awitness (withhand gestures)Check-inquestion whichleads to Joshtelling a verydistantly relatedchildhood storyWe convincethe coachesto come toour playsSomeone readsfor a rolethey’re notdoing and getshyperspecificcommentsOne directis full ofevidentiaryissuesWe have waytoo much foodon Sundaysand onlysnacks onFridaysWe call thewitnessesout of orderfor at leastone sideMichelle sendsan email withan (actuallypretty good)pun as thesubject lineThe coachesobject.Someonecompletelybreaks lawyer-character.Randomsong lyricsin emailsfrom JoshWe beginrunningsomething atapproximately7:45pm onFridayJosh leavescomments ona Google Docfor an openingor closingJosh checksthequotebookon a weeklybasisThere will be aname (ormultiple) thateveryonemispronouncesfor monthsSomeonegets madeto stand ina cornerRight aftercheck-in:someone, “Ihave a smallquestion”*45minutes later*Zoompractice overwinter breakor on a snowday“Where’dyou learnto do that?”- JoshCoachesrandomlywhisperingwhilesomething isgoing onA reallyhilariousscrimmageor moment inoneWisecrackabout Clara’ssaying “thedefenserests”Something is1+ minutesshort of thetime limitThe captainsask a Winsor-specific check-in question andthe coaches getmadRunning something for thefirst time: “I like it” - David.David and Josh proceed totear it apart, reorganize it,and change the way it'sdelivered over the next 30minutes. David then says.“but good start” and gives adouble thumbs-up and asi“I think it’sprettygood” -DavidFeedback on adraft of a directresults incompletelyrewriting andreordering5+ peoplehave thesame check-in answerWe watcha videoabout whatnot to doDavidrandomlyyellingsomethingoutdigs atElliot fromJoshJosh tries tocompliment uswith a metaphorbut ends upinsulting us (see“40% of the way toan A”)“May Iproceed?”Josh: “Yes”David: No”Some ofthe crossesget utterlyneglectedWe use ateacher oralum as inspofor a witnesscharacter“It looks like your readingfrom the computer whichwill improve once youhave it memorized andaren't reading from thecomputer” or somethingof that sort (on version1.0 of a direct?)David doesn’tget somethingthat everyoneelse hasmoved pastDavidcomplimentsMs. Elizondo’ssnacks atevery meetingVery fewpeople signup for theworkinggroupsSomeonedoes a deepdive into whatan expert isan expert onMs. Elizondocarries theteam (freeone)Josh and Daviddisagreestrongly on themost tiny detail(see “or rather”vs “rather”)One of ourcrosses isabout whatthe witnessdidn’t doJosh does a randomexercise to prove a point(e.g. taking away thecomputer, answeringevery other question,starting all your answerswith the letter l, havingmultiple witnesses readin unison).7+ quotesget added tothequotebook inone meetingSomeone says“good morningYH” on a Fridayor “goodevening YH ona Sunday”Silence afterrunningsomething for thefirst time and noone’s sure if thecoaches hate itJosh powerpointpresentation thathas us rethinkingeverything wethought weunderstood aboutevidenceDavid gets up to peerat the snacks whilesomeone’s runningsomething and wethink he’s comingtowards us. We quicklystop whispering, whichwe have been doingWe get pizzaapproximatelyonce (if we’relucky)Josh asks whatour theory of thecase is. We spendthe entire practicetalking about it anddo not leave with atheory of the case.RandomspecialguestSomethingexceeds itstime limit by2+ minutes“You can’t moveonce for eachwitness” -David (Orother commentsabout movingduring an openingor closing)Someonemispronouncessomething fromthe case law5.0 forsomething“No onewilted” -David after ascrimmageNotepadthing intheclosing“Someoneput aclock onit.” -DavidJosh will ask what ourmost important fact is,emphasize that that'sthe most important notmaking it catchy. Wewill instead be busywith alliteration andmetaphors and theRule of ThreesWisecrackof Sarah’sfreshmanGarden City“Does thishave a timeproblem?” -David“What do we want torun?” *silence* *Joshmakes a wisecrack(e.g. about howwonderful it is that hisattorneys are soeager to receivefeedback)*Josh makesa moviereferencethat <10% ofthe team getsRoles getswitchedaround (not asmuch as lastyear but still alot)WecrossJosh“Nickelwords notquarterwords” -Joshand/or DavidMichelleresponds toan emailwithin anhour“WHAT?”YOU HAVETO SPEAKUP” - DavidJosh makes tonsof references toalumni we’venever met.Michelle getsnostalgic“You needmultiplearrows inyour quiver”Criticizing thefirst draft of adirect forbeing marriedto the affidavitWe will spend alot of time in ameeting tryingto generate athemeNotes aregiven tothetimekeeper“What youshould insteaddo…is repeatthe question…slower.” -JoshJosh letsMichelle bea witnessand she isthrilledAfter roles aresent out, they telleveryone to cometo the coaches ifthey have anyobjections orcommentsWe pass Davidafter runningsomething, hemouths “goodjob”It will takeus monthsto settle ona themeThecoaches askus a trickquestion“May Iproceed?”*silence* “ohyeah sure goahead” - David“SLOW…DOWN…” -Josh to awitness (withhand gestures)Check-inquestion whichleads to Joshtelling a verydistantly relatedchildhood storyWe convincethe coachesto come toour playsSomeone readsfor a rolethey’re notdoing and getshyperspecificcommentsOne directis full ofevidentiaryissuesWe have waytoo much foodon Sundaysand onlysnacks onFridaysWe call thewitnessesout of orderfor at leastone sideMichelle sendsan email withan (actuallypretty good)pun as thesubject lineThe coachesobject.Someonecompletelybreaks lawyer-character.Randomsong lyricsin emailsfrom JoshWe beginrunningsomething atapproximately7:45pm onFridayJosh leavescomments ona Google Docfor an openingor closingJosh checksthequotebookon a weeklybasisThere will be aname (ormultiple) thateveryonemispronouncesfor monthsSomeonegets madeto stand ina cornerRight aftercheck-in:someone, “Ihave a smallquestion”*45minutes later*Zoompractice overwinter breakor on a snowday“Where’dyou learnto do that?”- JoshCoachesrandomlywhisperingwhilesomething isgoing onA reallyhilariousscrimmageor moment inoneWisecrackabout Clara’ssaying “thedefenserests”Something is1+ minutesshort of thetime limitThe captainsask a Winsor-specific check-in question andthe coaches getmadRunning something for thefirst time: “I like it” - David.David and Josh proceed totear it apart, reorganize it,and change the way it'sdelivered over the next 30minutes. David then says.“but good start” and gives adouble thumbs-up and asi“I think it’sprettygood” -DavidFeedback on adraft of a directresults incompletelyrewriting andreordering5+ peoplehave thesame check-in answerWe watcha videoabout whatnot to doDavidrandomlyyellingsomethingoutdigs atElliot fromJoshJosh tries tocompliment uswith a metaphorbut ends upinsulting us (see“40% of the way toan A”)“May Iproceed?”Josh: “Yes”David: No”Some ofthe crossesget utterlyneglectedWe use ateacher oralum as inspofor a witnesscharacter“It looks like your readingfrom the computer whichwill improve once youhave it memorized andaren't reading from thecomputer” or somethingof that sort (on version1.0 of a direct?)David doesn’tget somethingthat everyoneelse hasmoved pastDavidcomplimentsMs. Elizondo’ssnacks atevery meetingVery fewpeople signup for theworkinggroupsSomeonedoes a deepdive into whatan expert isan expert onMs. Elizondocarries theteam (freeone)

Sarah and Clara's Mock Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
  1. Josh and David disagree strongly on the most tiny detail (see “or rather” vs “rather”)
  2. One of our crosses is about what the witness didn’t do
  3. Josh does a random exercise to prove a point (e.g. taking away the computer, answering every other question, starting all your answers with the letter l, having multiple witnesses read in unison).
  4. 7+ quotes get added to the quotebook in one meeting
  5. Someone says “good morning YH” on a Friday or “good evening YH on a Sunday”
  6. Silence after running something for the first time and no one’s sure if the coaches hate it
  7. Josh powerpoint presentation that has us rethinking everything we thought we understood about evidence
  8. David gets up to peer at the snacks while someone’s running something and we think he’s coming towards us. We quickly stop whispering, which we have been doing
  9. We get pizza approximately once (if we’re lucky)
  10. Josh asks what our theory of the case is. We spend the entire practice talking about it and do not leave with a theory of the case.
  11. Random special guest
  12. Something exceeds its time limit by 2+ minutes
  13. “You can’t move once for each witness” -David (Or other comments about moving during an opening or closing)
  14. Someone mispronounces something from the case law
  15. 5.0 for something
  16. “No one wilted” -David after a scrimmage
  17. Notepad thing in the closing
  18. “Someone put a clock on it.” -David
  19. Josh will ask what our most important fact is, emphasize that that's the most important not making it catchy. We will instead be busy with alliteration and metaphors and the Rule of Threes
  20. Wisecrack of Sarah’s freshman Garden City
  21. “Does this have a time problem?” - David
  22. “What do we want to run?” *silence* *Josh makes a wisecrack (e.g. about how wonderful it is that his attorneys are so eager to receive feedback)*
  23. Josh makes a movie reference that <10% of the team gets
  24. Roles get switched around (not as much as last year but still a lot)
  25. We cross Josh
  26. “Nickel words not quarter words” -Josh and/or David
  27. Michelle responds to an email within an hour
  28. “WHAT?” YOU HAVE TO SPEAK UP” - David
  29. Josh makes tons of references to alumni we’ve never met. Michelle gets nostalgic
  30. “You need multiple arrows in your quiver”
  31. Criticizing the first draft of a direct for being married to the affidavit
  32. We will spend a lot of time in a meeting trying to generate a theme
  33. Notes are given to the timekeeper
  34. “What you should instead do…is repeat the question…slower.” -Josh
  35. Josh lets Michelle be a witness and she is thrilled
  36. After roles are sent out, they tell everyone to come to the coaches if they have any objections or comments
  37. We pass David after running something, he mouths “good job”
  38. It will take us months to settle on a theme
  39. The coaches ask us a trick question
  40. “May I proceed?” *silence* “oh yeah sure go ahead” - David
  41. “SLOW…DOWN…” -Josh to a witness (with hand gestures)
  42. Check-in question which leads to Josh telling a very distantly related childhood story
  43. We convince the coaches to come to our plays
  44. Someone reads for a role they’re not doing and gets hyperspecific comments
  45. One direct is full of evidentiary issues
  46. We have way too much food on Sundays and only snacks on Fridays
  47. We call the witnesses out of order for at least one side
  48. Michelle sends an email with an (actually pretty good) pun as the subject line
  49. The coaches object. Someone completely breaks lawyer-character.
  50. Random song lyrics in emails from Josh
  51. We begin running something at approximately 7:45pm on Friday
  52. Josh leaves comments on a Google Doc for an opening or closing
  53. Josh checks the quotebook on a weekly basis
  54. There will be a name (or multiple) that everyone mispronounces for months
  55. Someone gets made to stand in a corner
  56. Right after check-in: someone, “I have a small question”*45 minutes later*
  57. Zoom practice over winter break or on a snow day
  58. “Where’d you learn to do that?” - Josh
  59. Coaches randomly whispering while something is going on
  60. A really hilarious scrimmage or moment in one
  61. Wisecrack about Clara’s saying “the defense rests”
  62. Something is 1+ minutes short of the time limit
  63. The captains ask a Winsor-specific check-in question and the coaches get mad
  64. Running something for the first time: “I like it” - David. David and Josh proceed to tear it apart, reorganize it, and change the way it's delivered over the next 30 minutes. David then says. “but good start” and gives a double thumbs-up and a si
  65. “I think it’s pretty good” -David
  66. Feedback on a draft of a direct results in completely rewriting and reordering
  67. 5+ people have the same check-in answer
  68. We watch a video about what not to do
  69. David randomly yelling something out
  70. digs at Elliot from Josh
  71. Josh tries to compliment us with a metaphor but ends up insulting us (see “40% of the way to an A”)
  72. “May I proceed?” Josh: “Yes” David: No”
  73. Some of the crosses get utterly neglected
  74. We use a teacher or alum as inspo for a witness character
  75. “It looks like your reading from the computer which will improve once you have it memorized and aren't reading from the computer” or something of that sort (on version 1.0 of a direct?)
  76. David doesn’t get something that everyone else has moved past
  77. David compliments Ms. Elizondo’s snacks at every meeting
  78. Very few people sign up for the working groups
  79. Someone does a deep dive into what an expert is an expert on
  80. Ms. Elizondo carries the team (free one)