No True Scotsman(Making what couldbe called an appealto purity as a way todismiss relevantcriticisms or flaws ofan argument)The Fallacy Fallacy(Presuming thatbecause a claim hasbeen poorly argued,or a fallacy has beenmade, that it isnecessarily wrong)Tu Quoque(Avoiding havingto engage withcriticism by turningit back on theaccuser)Strawman(Misrepresentingsomeone’sargument tomake it easier toattack.)Special Pleading(Moving thegoalposts tocreate exceptionswhen a claim isshown to befalse.)Appeal to Emotion(Manipulating anemotional responsein place of a valid orcompellingargument.)Personal Incredulity(Saying thatbecause one findssomething difficult tounderstand that it’stherefore not true.)The TexasSharpshooter(Cherry-pickingdata clusters tosuit anargument)Appeal to Authority(Using the opinion orposition of anauthority figure, orinstitution of authority,in place of an actualargument.)Composition/Division(Assuming thatwhat’s true aboutone part ofsomething has to beapplied to all, orother, parts of it.)Anecdotal (Usingpersonalexperience or anisolated exampleinstead of a validargument)Circular Logic (Acircular argumentin which theconclusion isincluded in thepremise.)False Cause(Presuming that areal or perceivedrelationship betweenthings means thatone is the cause ofthe other.)Genetic (Judgingsomething good orbad on the basisof where it comesfrom)Bandwagon(Appealing topopularity or the factthat many people dosomething as anattempted form ofvalidation)Middle Ground(Saying that acompromise, ormiddle point,between twoextremes is thetruth.)Black or White(Where twoalternative states arepresented as theonly possibilities,when in fact morepossibilities exist.)Ad Hominem(Attacking youropponent’s characteror personal traits inan attempt toundermine theirargument.)The Gambler’sFallacy (Believingthat ‘runs’ occur tostatisticallyindependentphenomena)Burden of Proof(Saying that theburden of proof liesnot with the personmaking the claim,but with someoneelse to disprove.)Appeal to Nature(Making theargument thatbecausesomething is‘natural’ it istherefore valid)Slippery Slope(Asserting that if weallow A to happen,then Z willconsequentlyhappen too,therefore A shouldnot happen.)Ambiguity (Usingdouble meaningsor ambiguities oflanguage tomislead ormisrepresent thetruth.)Loaded Question(Asking a questionthat has anassumption built intoit so that it can’t beanswered withoutappearing guilty.)No True Scotsman(Making what couldbe called an appealto purity as a way todismiss relevantcriticisms or flaws ofan argument)The Fallacy Fallacy(Presuming thatbecause a claim hasbeen poorly argued,or a fallacy has beenmade, that it isnecessarily wrong)Tu Quoque(Avoiding havingto engage withcriticism by turningit back on theaccuser)Strawman(Misrepresentingsomeone’sargument tomake it easier toattack.)Special Pleading(Moving thegoalposts tocreate exceptionswhen a claim isshown to befalse.)Appeal to Emotion(Manipulating anemotional responsein place of a valid orcompellingargument.)Personal Incredulity(Saying thatbecause one findssomething difficult tounderstand that it’stherefore not true.)The TexasSharpshooter(Cherry-pickingdata clusters tosuit anargument)Appeal to Authority(Using the opinion orposition of anauthority figure, orinstitution of authority,in place of an actualargument.)Composition/Division(Assuming thatwhat’s true aboutone part ofsomething has to beapplied to all, orother, parts of it.)Anecdotal (Usingpersonalexperience or anisolated exampleinstead of a validargument)Circular Logic (Acircular argumentin which theconclusion isincluded in thepremise.)False Cause(Presuming that areal or perceivedrelationship betweenthings means thatone is the cause ofthe other.)Genetic (Judgingsomething good orbad on the basisof where it comesfrom)Bandwagon(Appealing topopularity or the factthat many people dosomething as anattempted form ofvalidation)Middle Ground(Saying that acompromise, ormiddle point,between twoextremes is thetruth.)Black or White(Where twoalternative states arepresented as theonly possibilities,when in fact morepossibilities exist.)Ad Hominem(Attacking youropponent’s characteror personal traits inan attempt toundermine theirargument.)The Gambler’sFallacy (Believingthat ‘runs’ occur tostatisticallyindependentphenomena)Burden of Proof(Saying that theburden of proof liesnot with the personmaking the claim,but with someoneelse to disprove.)Appeal to Nature(Making theargument thatbecausesomething is‘natural’ it istherefore valid)Slippery Slope(Asserting that if weallow A to happen,then Z willconsequentlyhappen too,therefore A shouldnot happen.)Ambiguity (Usingdouble meaningsor ambiguities oflanguage tomislead ormisrepresent thetruth.)Loaded Question(Asking a questionthat has anassumption built intoit so that it can’t beanswered withoutappearing guilty.)

Logical Fallacies - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. No True Scotsman (Making what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of an argument)
  2. The Fallacy Fallacy (Presuming that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that it is necessarily wrong)
  3. Tu Quoque (Avoiding having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser)
  4. Strawman (Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.)
  5. Special Pleading (Moving the goalposts to create exceptions when a claim is shown to be false.)
  6. Appeal to Emotion (Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.)
  7. Personal Incredulity (Saying that because one finds something difficult to understand that it’s therefore not true.)
  8. The Texas Sharpshooter (Cherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument)
  9. Appeal to Authority (Using the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument.)
  10. Composition/Division (Assuming that what’s true about one part of something has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it.)
  11. Anecdotal (Using personal experience or an isolated example instead of a valid argument)
  12. Circular Logic (A circular argument in which the conclusion is included in the premise.)
  13. False Cause (Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other.)
  14. Genetic (Judging something good or bad on the basis of where it comes from)
  15. Bandwagon (Appealing to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation)
  16. Middle Ground (Saying that a compromise, or middle point, between two extremes is the truth.)
  17. Black or White (Where two alternative states are presented as the only possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist.)
  18. Ad Hominem (Attacking your opponent’s character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.)
  19. The Gambler’s Fallacy (Believing that ‘runs’ occur to statistically independent phenomena)
  20. Burden of Proof (Saying that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.)
  21. Appeal to Nature (Making the argument that because something is ‘natural’ it is therefore valid)
  22. Slippery Slope (Asserting that if we allow A to happen, then Z will consequently happen too, therefore A should not happen.)
  23. Ambiguity (Using double meanings or ambiguities of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.)
  24. Loaded Question (Asking a question that has an assumption built into it so that it can’t be answered without appearing guilty.)