SnacksNepotism!Presenterdeflectswork ontoaudienceAnadministratorcontradicts thedirections givenby the previousadministratorThe same personcontinues tospeak regardlessof subject orknowledge, eitherreal or imaginedSomeoneproposes anactivity that isridiculouslybelow gradelevelSomeone ishaving morefun than youare, for somereasonOlder “new”technology that isalready obsolete,that willrevolutionize ourteachingIn a desperate bidfor attention,someone scoldsthe group for theirattitudeSomeone asksa question thatextends themeetingunnecessarilyRollout of yetanother techsystem thatmay or may notdo what itpromisesStalematedcontractnegotiationsarereferencedData!District StrategicFramework/PlanSomeone sharestheir personalinsecurities ratherthan asking apurposefulquestionIn an attempt at“fun,” the groupleader runs agame thatdoesn’t reallyworkSomeonegoes off on atangent,prolongingthe agonySomeoneshushesthe group.Informationpresented couldhave easilybeen distributedin an email.Again.“I’ll have toget backto you onthat” (2x+)Uh-oh, you had toquestion at least 5times thequalifications ofthe speaker fortheir job titleAdministrationeavesdropsSomebodystays after totalk about thetopic with thepresenterThe tech used inthepresentation/taskrefuses to workPowerstruggleSomebodyis gradingpapersPresenteris pushinga productfor saleSycophantismThe group does“nose goes” inan attempt toavoid beingchosen forsomethingSnacksNepotism!Presenterdeflectswork ontoaudienceAnadministratorcontradicts thedirections givenby the previousadministratorThe same personcontinues tospeak regardlessof subject orknowledge, eitherreal or imaginedSomeoneproposes anactivity that isridiculouslybelow gradelevelSomeone ishaving morefun than youare, for somereasonOlder “new”technology that isalready obsolete,that willrevolutionize ourteachingIn a desperate bidfor attention,someone scoldsthe group for theirattitudeSomeone asksa question thatextends themeetingunnecessarilyRollout of yetanother techsystem thatmay or may notdo what itpromisesStalematedcontractnegotiationsarereferencedData!District StrategicFramework/PlanSomeone sharestheir personalinsecurities ratherthan asking apurposefulquestionIn an attempt at“fun,” the groupleader runs agame thatdoesn’t reallyworkSomeonegoes off on atangent,prolongingthe agonySomeoneshushesthe group.Informationpresented couldhave easilybeen distributedin an email.Again.“I’ll have toget backto you onthat” (2x+)Uh-oh, you had toquestion at least 5times thequalifications ofthe speaker fortheir job titleAdministrationeavesdropsSomebodystays after totalk about thetopic with thepresenterThe tech used inthepresentation/taskrefuses to workPowerstruggleSomebodyis gradingpapersPresenteris pushinga productfor saleSycophantismThe group does“nose goes” inan attempt toavoid beingchosen forsomething

UnBingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
  1. Snacks
  2. Nepotism!
  3. Presenter deflects work onto audience
  4. An administrator contradicts the directions given by the previous administrator
  5. The same person continues to speak regardless of subject or knowledge, either real or imagined
  6. Someone proposes an activity that is ridiculously below grade level
  7. Someone is having more fun than you are, for some reason
  8. Older “new” technology that is already obsolete, that will revolutionize our teaching
  9. In a desperate bid for attention, someone scolds the group for their attitude
  10. Someone asks a question that extends the meeting unnecessarily
  11. Rollout of yet another tech system that may or may not do what it promises
  12. Stalemated contract negotiations are referenced
  13. Data!
  14. District Strategic Framework/Plan
  15. Someone shares their personal insecurities rather than asking a purposeful question
  16. In an attempt at “fun,” the group leader runs a game that doesn’t really work
  17. Someone goes off on a tangent, prolonging the agony
  18. Someone shushes the group.
  19. Information presented could have easily been distributed in an email. Again.
  20. “I’ll have to get back to you on that” (2x+)
  21. Uh-oh, you had to question at least 5 times the qualifications of the speaker for their job title
  22. Administration eavesdrops
  23. Somebody stays after to talk about the topic with the presenter
  24. The tech used in the presentation/task refuses to work
  25. Power struggle
  26. Somebody is grading papers
  27. Presenter is pushing a product for sale
  28. Sycophantism
  29. The group does “nose goes” in an attempt to avoid being chosen for something