Falsifiedresults sothey werecloser toexpectationsMade a"largespill"Blatantlyignored TA'slab partnerassignmentsWondered howthe chemistrydepartment fitsin with SLU'sJesuit missionCreated a realand presentdanger toyourself andothersNot cleanedglasswareafter anexperimentConsideredtaking actions,legal or not, toget labcanceledUsed thewrongwastecontainerPutglasswareaway wetDecided thatyou would100% not stripfor the safetyshower if itcame to thatPouredchemicalsdown thesinkFelt a bond within yourlab section strongerthan any otherrelationship you'veformed because yourfriendship was forged inthe fires of chemistryLaughed atthe TA'sjokes to curryfavor withthemBrokeglasswareObtainedresults thatbrokefundamentalnatural lawsConsideredconsuming achemical toget out of labNot cleanedglasswarebeforestartingexperimentSmelledchemicals(instead ofwafting)Madeproduct"disappear"Hoped anaturaldisaster woulddestroyMonsantoQuestioned iftaking anothersemester of labwas worthachieving yourmajor life goalsHad to usean eyewashor safetyshowerRan an IRknowing fullwell that yourdesired productwas not in thesampleReceivedinstructionsfrom the TA thatdirectlycontradicted thepre-labFalsifiedresults sothey werecloser toexpectationsMade a"largespill"Blatantlyignored TA'slab partnerassignmentsWondered howthe chemistrydepartment fitsin with SLU'sJesuit missionCreated a realand presentdanger toyourself andothersNot cleanedglasswareafter anexperimentConsideredtaking actions,legal or not, toget labcanceledUsed thewrongwastecontainerPutglasswareaway wetDecided thatyou would100% not stripfor the safetyshower if itcame to thatPouredchemicalsdown thesinkFelt a bond within yourlab section strongerthan any otherrelationship you'veformed because yourfriendship was forged inthe fires of chemistryLaughed atthe TA'sjokes to curryfavor withthemBrokeglasswareObtainedresults thatbrokefundamentalnatural lawsConsideredconsuming achemical toget out of labNot cleanedglasswarebeforestartingexperimentSmelledchemicals(instead ofwafting)Madeproduct"disappear"Hoped anaturaldisaster woulddestroyMonsantoQuestioned iftaking anothersemester of labwas worthachieving yourmajor life goalsHad to usean eyewashor safetyshowerRan an IRknowing fullwell that yourdesired productwas not in thesampleReceivedinstructionsfrom the TA thatdirectlycontradicted thepre-lab

Organic Chemistry Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Falsified results so they were closer to expectations
  2. Made a "large spill"
  3. Blatantly ignored TA's lab partner assignments
  4. Wondered how the chemistry department fits in with SLU's Jesuit mission
  5. Created a real and present danger to yourself and others
  6. Not cleaned glassware after an experiment
  7. Considered taking actions, legal or not, to get lab canceled
  8. Used the wrong waste container
  9. Put glassware away wet
  10. Decided that you would 100% not strip for the safety shower if it came to that
  11. Poured chemicals down the sink
  12. Felt a bond within your lab section stronger than any other relationship you've formed because your friendship was forged in the fires of chemistry
  13. Laughed at the TA's jokes to curry favor with them
  14. Broke glassware
  15. Obtained results that broke fundamental natural laws
  16. Considered consuming a chemical to get out of lab
  17. Not cleaned glassware before starting experiment
  18. Smelled chemicals (instead of wafting)
  19. Made product "disappear"
  20. Hoped a natural disaster would destroy Monsanto
  21. Questioned if taking another semester of lab was worth achieving your major life goals
  22. Had to use an eyewash or safety shower
  23. Ran an IR knowing full well that your desired product was not in the sample
  24. Received instructions from the TA that directly contradicted the pre-lab