thesis: same but different rampant apostrophe abuse essay just strung- together quotes misspells own name "in today's society" no bibliography thesaurus abuse "were known as" essay or paper is laughably short "back then" or "in those times" unhelpful modern comparison stilted introduction of quote plagiarism misspells topic of paper "the dictionary defines x as..." "I really enjoyed this book" religious opinion as historical fact "throughout history" describes monograph as a "novel" terrible internet source mixed up "affect" and "effect" argument ignores basic chronology MLA instead of CMS summary instead of analysis thesis: same but different rampant apostrophe abuse essay just strung- together quotes misspells own name "in today's society" no bibliography thesaurus abuse "were known as" essay or paper is laughably short "back then" or "in those times" unhelpful modern comparison stilted introduction of quote plagiarism misspells topic of paper "the dictionary defines x as..." "I really enjoyed this book" religious opinion as historical fact "throughout history" describes monograph as a "novel" terrible internet source mixed up "affect" and "effect" argument ignores basic chronology MLA instead of CMS summary instead of analysis
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
thesis: same but different
rampant apostrophe abuse
essay just strung-together quotes
misspells own name
"in today's society"
no bibliography
thesaurus abuse
"were known as"
essay or paper is laughably short
"back then" or "in those times"
unhelpful modern comparison
stilted introduction of quote
plagiarism
misspells topic of paper
"the dictionary defines x as..."
"I really enjoyed this book"
religious opinion as historical fact
"throughout history"
describes monograph as a "novel"
terrible internet source
mixed up "affect" and "effect"
argument ignores basic chronology
MLA instead of CMS
summary instead of analysis