"In themanga...""all partsbest part"excusescharacters getting0 screen time ornever comingback since "itswhat arakiintended"would learnjapanese justto protect godking araki'swritingBSheadcannon toexplain slightlyincorrectdetailsthinks "arakiforgot" is a100% genuinesentimentwithout anysatire/hyperboledisprovesinconsistenciesas "clearlyjokes""In aninterviewwitharaki.."p6'sendingis good"IS THIS AJOJOREFERENCE?"says ORAORA/MUDAMUDA IRLthinks p1 isgenuinlyentertainingtakesheadcannonas factthinks KC iseasy tounderstand, 0jank moments,0 plot holes, 0contradictionstakes any detailspeople think mighthave been cool toadd and criticizesthem because arakididn't include or planit, and he is isperfectjank, easily re-writable momentslike DIO's p3return were totallyplanned by arakihates"partskippers"re-writes andincorrect details inthe developmentalphase of an ideadon't exist, insteadheadcannon areasongenerallycondescendingtone whenexplaining jojoworshipsjojotubers1-off abilitiesgetting nomoreelaboration isOKClaims "Jojo canstill be criticized,this just isn't theway!," then nevercriticizes jojolistens to the musicreferences onlybecause of thereference, probablyhas never heard ofthe bands originallystans p4 ifanime onlystans p7 ifmanga"In themanga...""all partsbest part"excusescharacters getting0 screen time ornever comingback since "itswhat arakiintended"would learnjapanese justto protect godking araki'swritingBSheadcannon toexplain slightlyincorrectdetailsthinks "arakiforgot" is a100% genuinesentimentwithout anysatire/hyperboledisprovesinconsistenciesas "clearlyjokes""In aninterviewwitharaki.."p6'sendingis good"IS THIS AJOJOREFERENCE?"says ORAORA/MUDAMUDA IRLthinks p1 isgenuinlyentertainingtakesheadcannonas factthinks KC iseasy tounderstand, 0jank moments,0 plot holes, 0contradictionstakes any detailspeople think mighthave been cool toadd and criticizesthem because arakididn't include or planit, and he is isperfectjank, easily re-writable momentslike DIO's p3return were totallyplanned by arakihates"partskippers"re-writes andincorrect details inthe developmentalphase of an ideadon't exist, insteadheadcannon areasongenerallycondescendingtone whenexplaining jojoworshipsjojotubers1-off abilitiesgetting nomoreelaboration isOKClaims "Jojo canstill be criticized,this just isn't theway!," then nevercriticizes jojolistens to the musicreferences onlybecause of thereference, probablyhas never heard ofthe bands originallystans p4 ifanime onlystans p7 ifmanga

JoJo Brain Rot Bingo Card - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. "In the manga..."
  2. "all parts best part"
  3. excuses characters getting 0 screen time or never coming back since "its what araki intended"
  4. would learn japanese just to protect god king araki's writing
  5. BS headcannon to explain slightly incorrect details
  6. thinks "araki forgot" is a 100% genuine sentiment without any satire/hyperbole
  7. disproves inconsistencies as "clearly jokes"
  8. "In an interview with araki.."
  9. p6's ending is good
  10. "IS THIS A JOJO REFERENCE?"
  11. says ORA ORA/MUDA MUDA IRL
  12. thinks p1 is genuinly entertaining
  13. takes headcannon as fact
  14. thinks KC is easy to understand, 0 jank moments, 0 plot holes, 0 contradictions
  15. takes any details people think might have been cool to add and criticizes them because araki didn't include or plan it, and he is is perfect
  16. jank, easily re-writable moments like DIO's p3 return were totally planned by araki
  17. hates "part skippers"
  18. re-writes and incorrect details in the developmental phase of an idea don't exist, instead headcannon a reason
  19. generally condescending tone when explaining jojo
  20. worships jojotubers
  21. 1-off abilities getting no more elaboration is OK
  22. Claims "Jojo can still be criticized, this just isn't the way!," then never criticizes jojo
  23. listens to the music references only because of the reference, probably has never heard of the bands originally
  24. stans p4 if anime only stans p7 if manga