cites areviewafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargument"we havepreviouslydemonstrated""the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesfind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsonly paperfrom thelast 5 yearsis a reviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcethis is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished)is 1968too farback?you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alonecites areviewafter reading apaper for anhour, yourealise its tooirrelevant5th page of googlescholar becausethere WILL besciencesupporting yourargument"we havepreviouslydemonstrated""the precisemolecularmechanismis yet to beelucidated"give up ongoogle scholar,and having thefalse hope thatifind will do anybetter for youhas read thesameintroductionat least 40timesfind a nuggetof info, write itin 7 places soyou don'tforget it existsonly paperfrom thelast 5 yearsis a reviewwhy has thatauthor gotsuch a weirdname?ctrl+f: "insertprotein inyour topictitle here"seeing the sameauthor pop up inmany papers, andwondering whatthey're like inpersonreview citesanother reviewthat's meant tobe a primarysourcethis is consistentwith our recentfindings that X+Y= Z (data yet to bepublished)is 1968too farback?you succesfullypredict a paperis a reviewbased on thetitle alone

lit review 2020 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. cites a review
  2. after reading a paper for an hour, you realise its too irrelevant
  3. 5th page of google scholar because there WILL be science supporting your argument
  4. "we have previously demonstrated"
  5. "the precise molecular mechanism is yet to be elucidated"
  6. give up on google scholar, and having the false hope that ifind will do any better for you
  7. has read the same introduction at least 40 times
  8. find a nugget of info, write it in 7 places so you don't forget it exists
  9. only paper from the last 5 years is a review
  10. why has that author got such a weird name?
  11. ctrl+f: "insert protein in your topic title here"
  12. seeing the same author pop up in many papers, and wondering what they're like in person
  13. review cites another review that's meant to be a primary source
  14. this is consistent with our recent findings that X+Y = Z (data yet to be published)
  15. is 1968 too far back?
  16. you succesfully predict a paper is a review based on the title alone