(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
I-claims the program is already diverse because there are Asian students
G-“always open to your suggestions”
O-“color/race/need blind”
O-survey sent out, no action taken from results
I-EMSPAA sends an email about their commitment to diversity while denying diversity committee
B-“in this unique time” as if racism hasn’t existed for the last 20 years
B-says “thank you for your advocacy” while denying what you’re advocating for
B-asks you to send research, doesn’t read it
G-suggests a very labor intensive project they have absolutely no intention of contributing to
N-someone recommends “White Fragility”
G-uses existence of equity committee that they don’t listen to as evidence of their commitment to equity
N-“ongoing discussions”
B-spends more time naming equity committee than doing equity work
B-“a product of society-wide inequalities”
G-“a time to listen”
N-“SAT scores are the only objective way to compare applicants”
G-claims we can’t be racist because it’s not “intentional”
O-suggests you’re doing equity work incorrectly as someone who started thinking about it 10 minutes ago
I-“intellectual diversity”
O-uses bureaucratic roadblocks that could come up as an excuse to do zero equity work whatsoever
I-accepts smallest possible change so they can say they’re doing “anti-racist work” while denying every other demand
N-demands data, makes you pay for it, then gets angry at you for publicizing it
O-reframes work unrelated to equity as equity work
