(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Someone clearly didn’t understand their project
Poster has extra pictures to compensate for lack of actual results
Eye-wateringly ugly colour scheme
Academic gets wasted on free booze
Blatant typo
Illegible colour contrast
Student forgets to include acknowledgements section
You can’t understand the student through their mumbling
Student dodges question at politician level by answering another question entirely
Poster gets completely ignored by entire department
Project is obvious offshoot of someone’s PhD
Student somehow manages to retain enthusiasm for project
Poster includes reference to supervisor’s work
Formatting follows no logical pattern
Low resolution figures made of 1-inch pixels
Student has supervisor hovering nearby
Poster has graphs/figures too small to read
Repeated use of “um” when explaining work
Scope of research not evident without verbal explanation
Entire poster is filled with text/equations
Student shows clear signs of project-induced trauma
Project is clearly just setting groundwork for future honours student
Student refers question to supervisor or PhD student
Poster clearly thrown together at last-possible minute
