Project isclearly justsettinggroundwork forfuture honoursstudentStudent dodgesquestion atpolitician level byanswering anotherquestion entirelyYou can’tunderstandthe studentthrough theirmumblingFormattingfollows nologicalpatternEntire posteris filled withtext/equationsStudent showsclear signs ofproject-inducedtraumaPoster getscompletelyignored byentiredepartmentStudent forgets toincludeacknowledgementssectionStudentsomehowmanages toretainenthusiasm forprojectIllegiblecolourcontrastRepeateduse of “um”whenexplainingworkPosterincludesreference tosupervisor’sworkPoster clearlythrowntogether atlast-possibleminuteScope ofresearch notevidentwithout verbalexplanationEye-wateringlyugly colourschemeStudent refersquestion tosupervisor orPhD studentAcademicgetswasted onfree boozeStudent hassupervisorhoveringnearbySomeoneclearly didn’tunderstandtheir projectPoster hasgraphs/figurestoo small toreadProject isobviousoffshoot ofsomeone’sPhDLowresolutionfigures madeof 1-inchpixelsPoster hasextra picturesto compensatefor lack ofactual resultsBlatanttypoProject isclearly justsettinggroundwork forfuture honoursstudentStudent dodgesquestion atpolitician level byanswering anotherquestion entirelyYou can’tunderstandthe studentthrough theirmumblingFormattingfollows nologicalpatternEntire posteris filled withtext/equationsStudent showsclear signs ofproject-inducedtraumaPoster getscompletelyignored byentiredepartmentStudent forgets toincludeacknowledgementssectionStudentsomehowmanages toretainenthusiasm forprojectIllegiblecolourcontrastRepeateduse of “um”whenexplainingworkPosterincludesreference tosupervisor’sworkPoster clearlythrowntogether atlast-possibleminuteScope ofresearch notevidentwithout verbalexplanationEye-wateringlyugly colourschemeStudent refersquestion tosupervisor orPhD studentAcademicgetswasted onfree boozeStudent hassupervisorhoveringnearbySomeoneclearly didn’tunderstandtheir projectPoster hasgraphs/figurestoo small toreadProject isobviousoffshoot ofsomeone’sPhDLowresolutionfigures madeof 1-inchpixelsPoster hasextra picturesto compensatefor lack ofactual resultsBlatanttypo

Poster Session Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Project is clearly just setting groundwork for future honours student
  2. Student dodges question at politician level by answering another question entirely
  3. You can’t understand the student through their mumbling
  4. Formatting follows no logical pattern
  5. Entire poster is filled with text/equations
  6. Student shows clear signs of project-induced trauma
  7. Poster gets completely ignored by entire department
  8. Student forgets to include acknowledgements section
  9. Student somehow manages to retain enthusiasm for project
  10. Illegible colour contrast
  11. Repeated use of “um” when explaining work
  12. Poster includes reference to supervisor’s work
  13. Poster clearly thrown together at last-possible minute
  14. Scope of research not evident without verbal explanation
  15. Eye-wateringly ugly colour scheme
  16. Student refers question to supervisor or PhD student
  17. Academic gets wasted on free booze
  18. Student has supervisor hovering nearby
  19. Someone clearly didn’t understand their project
  20. Poster has graphs/figures too small to read
  21. Project is obvious offshoot of someone’s PhD
  22. Low resolution figures made of 1-inch pixels
  23. Poster has extra pictures to compensate for lack of actual results
  24. Blatant typo