Debate ishosted by aMSM thatsupports onecandidate overanother/othersA candidateblatantlydodges aquestionA candidate claimsthe othercandidate is badw/o actuallyexplaining theirown merits.A policy isactuallydiscussedAquestion/responseis below the belt.A candidateignores rulesof debateA candidatesays somethingthat changesyour view ofthem for thebetter.A candidateclaims that onlytheir side caresabout abipartisan issueA Candidateflips on theirpreviouslyheldpositions.A candidate hypesup how wonderfultheir plan iswithout actuallytalking about thedetails of theirplan.Candidatestalk overeach other.You feelthere is abias in thequestionsbeing asked.Thedebatestarts lateTheaudienceisdisruptiveFear-mongeringStats arepulledfrom thinair.You feeltempted tostopwatching outof frustration.A candidatecomplimentsanothercandidate.No trueScotsmanYou canpinpoint whatsoundbite isgoing to berepeatedtomorrow.A candidaterelies onanecdotalevidenceAcandidatetries to tella joke.AdHominemCandidates agreeabout 99% of aplan and thenargue relentlesslyabout the 1% thedisagree on.Debate ishosted by aMSM thatsupports onecandidate overanother/othersA candidateblatantlydodges aquestionA candidate claimsthe othercandidate is badw/o actuallyexplaining theirown merits.A policy isactuallydiscussedAquestion/responseis below the belt.A candidateignores rulesof debateA candidatesays somethingthat changesyour view ofthem for thebetter.A candidateclaims that onlytheir side caresabout abipartisan issueA Candidateflips on theirpreviouslyheldpositions.A candidate hypesup how wonderfultheir plan iswithout actuallytalking about thedetails of theirplan.Candidatestalk overeach other.You feelthere is abias in thequestionsbeing asked.Thedebatestarts lateTheaudienceisdisruptiveFear-mongeringStats arepulledfrom thinair.You feeltempted tostopwatching outof frustration.A candidatecomplimentsanothercandidate.No trueScotsmanYou canpinpoint whatsoundbite isgoing to berepeatedtomorrow.A candidaterelies onanecdotalevidenceAcandidatetries to tella joke.AdHominemCandidates agreeabout 99% of aplan and thenargue relentlesslyabout the 1% thedisagree on.

Debate Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Debate is hosted by a MSM that supports one candidate over another/others
  2. A candidate blatantly dodges a question
  3. A candidate claims the other candidate is bad w/o actually explaining their own merits.
  4. A policy is actually discussed
  5. A question/response is below the belt.
  6. A candidate ignores rules of debate
  7. A candidate says something that changes your view of them for the better.
  8. A candidate claims that only their side cares about a bipartisan issue
  9. A Candidate flips on their previously held positions.
  10. A candidate hypes up how wonderful their plan is without actually talking about the details of their plan.
  11. Candidates talk over each other.
  12. You feel there is a bias in the questions being asked.
  13. The debate starts late
  14. The audience is disruptive
  15. Fear-mongering
  16. Stats are pulled from thin air.
  17. You feel tempted to stop watching out of frustration.
  18. A candidate compliments another candidate.
  19. No true Scotsman
  20. You can pinpoint what soundbite is going to be repeated tomorrow.
  21. A candidate relies on anecdotal evidence
  22. A candidate tries to tell a joke.
  23. Ad Hominem
  24. Candidates agree about 99% of a plan and then argue relentlessly about the 1% the disagree on.