(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Argues against the demographic their discrimination affects.
“Science says…” quotes from bigoted, uninformed, prejudiced science, while neglecting to acknowledge the inherent white supremacy of science.
“I have [person from marginalised demographic] in my PMs telling me they agree but don’t want to say publicly.”
Uses loved ones as a shield to support prejudiced view.
“You don’t represent all [marginalised group].”
Denial of the lived experience of the oppressed.
Uses the anger, frustration, and exhaustion of oppressed people to say they aren’t calm/rational/logical enough to be valid.
Uses slurs/incorrect terminology while insisting they’re not discriminatory.
Uses their lived experience as an oppressor to prove/perpetuate a harmful stereotype.
Uses being marginalised in different areas to excuse discrimination.
Says someone’s feelings are valid while totally ignoring them.
Uses “feminist”/ “leftist”/ “liberal”/ “woke” or other derivatives as slurs.
Victim blaming.
Slippery slope fallacy/ “Where does political correctness end?”
Unrealistic expectation on [marginalised demographic] that they don’t apply to themselves.
“We already have equality.”
Emphasises hearing both sides as though historical and contemporary society hasn’t erased marginalised voices.
Uses reductionist dictionary definitions of complex manifestations of systemic oppression to support arguments.
Uses helplessness in the wider issue to excuse personal inaction.
Backed up by their privileged friends.
Tone policing/ wages allyship on the niceness of the oppressed towards them personally.
Centres themselves in the argument/ uses a personal issue to garner sympathy.
Fails to understand nuances/ differences between individual/ institutional/ systemic prejudices.
