Uses reductionistdictionary definitionsof complexmanifestations ofsystemic oppressionto supportarguments.Uses lovedones as ashield tosupportprejudicedview.“You don’trepresent all[marginalisedgroup].”Argues againstthedemographictheirdiscriminationaffects.Centresthemselves in theargument/ uses apersonal issue togarner sympathy.“I have [person frommarginaliseddemographic] in myPMs telling me theyagree but don’twant to saypublicly.”Says someone’sfeelings arevalid whiletotally ignoringthem.Uses beingmarginalised indifferent areasto excusediscrimination.“Science says…”quotes from bigoted,uninformed, prejudicedscience, whileneglecting toacknowledge theinherent whitesupremacy of science.Fails to understandnuances/ differencesbetween individual/institutional/ systemicprejudices.Backed upby theirprivilegedfriends.Takesdisagreementsas attack.Uses the anger,frustration, andexhaustion ofoppressed people tosay they aren’tcalm/rational/logicalenough to be valid.Uses “feminist”/“leftist”/ “liberal”/“woke” or otherderivatives asslurs.Denial of thelivedexperienceof theoppressed.Victimblaming.Unrealisticexpectation on[marginaliseddemographic] thatthey don’t apply tothemselves.“Wealreadyhaveequality.”Uses their livedexperience as anoppressor toprove/perpetuatea harmfulstereotype.Emphasises hearingboth sides as thoughhistorical andcontemporary societyhasn’t erasedmarginalised voices.Usesslurs/incorrectterminologywhile insistingthey’re notdiscriminatory.Slippery slopefallacy/ “Wheredoes politicalcorrectnessend?”Tone policing/wages allyship onthe niceness of theoppressedtowards thempersonally.Useshelplessness inthe wider issueto excusepersonalinaction.Uses reductionistdictionary definitionsof complexmanifestations ofsystemic oppressionto supportarguments.Uses lovedones as ashield tosupportprejudicedview.“You don’trepresent all[marginalisedgroup].”Argues againstthedemographictheirdiscriminationaffects.Centresthemselves in theargument/ uses apersonal issue togarner sympathy.“I have [person frommarginaliseddemographic] in myPMs telling me theyagree but don’twant to saypublicly.”Says someone’sfeelings arevalid whiletotally ignoringthem.Uses beingmarginalised indifferent areasto excusediscrimination.“Science says…”quotes from bigoted,uninformed, prejudicedscience, whileneglecting toacknowledge theinherent whitesupremacy of science.Fails to understandnuances/ differencesbetween individual/institutional/ systemicprejudices.Backed upby theirprivilegedfriends.Takesdisagreementsas attack.Uses the anger,frustration, andexhaustion ofoppressed people tosay they aren’tcalm/rational/logicalenough to be valid.Uses “feminist”/“leftist”/ “liberal”/“woke” or otherderivatives asslurs.Denial of thelivedexperienceof theoppressed.Victimblaming.Unrealisticexpectation on[marginaliseddemographic] thatthey don’t apply tothemselves.“Wealreadyhaveequality.”Uses their livedexperience as anoppressor toprove/perpetuatea harmfulstereotype.Emphasises hearingboth sides as thoughhistorical andcontemporary societyhasn’t erasedmarginalised voices.Usesslurs/incorrectterminologywhile insistingthey’re notdiscriminatory.Slippery slopefallacy/ “Wheredoes politicalcorrectnessend?”Tone policing/wages allyship onthe niceness of theoppressedtowards thempersonally.Useshelplessness inthe wider issueto excusepersonalinaction.

Internet discrimination bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Uses reductionist dictionary definitions of complex manifestations of systemic oppression to support arguments.
  2. Uses loved ones as a shield to support prejudiced view.
  3. “You don’t represent all [marginalised group].”
  4. Argues against the demographic their discrimination affects.
  5. Centres themselves in the argument/ uses a personal issue to garner sympathy.
  6. “I have [person from marginalised demographic] in my PMs telling me they agree but don’t want to say publicly.”
  7. Says someone’s feelings are valid while totally ignoring them.
  8. Uses being marginalised in different areas to excuse discrimination.
  9. “Science says…” quotes from bigoted, uninformed, prejudiced science, while neglecting to acknowledge the inherent white supremacy of science.
  10. Fails to understand nuances/ differences between individual/ institutional/ systemic prejudices.
  11. Backed up by their privileged friends.
  12. Takes disagreements as attack.
  13. Uses the anger, frustration, and exhaustion of oppressed people to say they aren’t calm/rational/logical enough to be valid.
  14. Uses “feminist”/ “leftist”/ “liberal”/ “woke” or other derivatives as slurs.
  15. Denial of the lived experience of the oppressed.
  16. Victim blaming.
  17. Unrealistic expectation on [marginalised demographic] that they don’t apply to themselves.
  18. “We already have equality.”
  19. Uses their lived experience as an oppressor to prove/perpetuate a harmful stereotype.
  20. Emphasises hearing both sides as though historical and contemporary society hasn’t erased marginalised voices.
  21. Uses slurs/incorrect terminology while insisting they’re not discriminatory.
  22. Slippery slope fallacy/ “Where does political correctness end?”
  23. Tone policing/ wages allyship on the niceness of the oppressed towards them personally.
  24. Uses helplessness in the wider issue to excuse personal inaction.