Uses the anger,frustration, andexhaustion ofoppressed people tosay they aren’tcalm/rational/logicalenough to be valid.Argues againstthedemographictheirdiscriminationaffects.Denial of thelivedexperienceof theoppressed.Slippery slopefallacy/ “Wheredoes politicalcorrectnessend?”Usesslurs/incorrectterminologywhile insistingthey’re notdiscriminatory.“Wealreadyhaveequality.”Centresthemselves in theargument/ uses apersonal issue togarner sympathy.Takesdisagreementsas attack.“Science says…”quotes from bigoted,uninformed, prejudicedscience, whileneglecting toacknowledge theinherent whitesupremacy of science.Useshelplessness inthe wider issueto excusepersonalinaction.Uses “feminist”/“leftist”/ “liberal”/“woke” or otherderivatives asslurs.Unrealisticexpectation on[marginaliseddemographic] thatthey don’t apply tothemselves.“I have [person frommarginaliseddemographic] in myPMs telling me theyagree but don’twant to saypublicly.”Says someone’sfeelings arevalid whiletotally ignoringthem.Uses beingmarginalised indifferent areasto excusediscrimination.“You don’trepresent all[marginalisedgroup].”Emphasises hearingboth sides as thoughhistorical andcontemporary societyhasn’t erasedmarginalised voices.Backed upby theirprivilegedfriends.Tone policing/wages allyship onthe niceness of theoppressedtowards thempersonally.Uses lovedones as ashield tosupportprejudicedview.Uses reductionistdictionary definitionsof complexmanifestations ofsystemic oppressionto supportarguments.Uses their livedexperience as anoppressor toprove/perpetuatea harmfulstereotype.Fails to understandnuances/ differencesbetween individual/institutional/ systemicprejudices.Victimblaming.Uses the anger,frustration, andexhaustion ofoppressed people tosay they aren’tcalm/rational/logicalenough to be valid.Argues againstthedemographictheirdiscriminationaffects.Denial of thelivedexperienceof theoppressed.Slippery slopefallacy/ “Wheredoes politicalcorrectnessend?”Usesslurs/incorrectterminologywhile insistingthey’re notdiscriminatory.“Wealreadyhaveequality.”Centresthemselves in theargument/ uses apersonal issue togarner sympathy.Takesdisagreementsas attack.“Science says…”quotes from bigoted,uninformed, prejudicedscience, whileneglecting toacknowledge theinherent whitesupremacy of science.Useshelplessness inthe wider issueto excusepersonalinaction.Uses “feminist”/“leftist”/ “liberal”/“woke” or otherderivatives asslurs.Unrealisticexpectation on[marginaliseddemographic] thatthey don’t apply tothemselves.“I have [person frommarginaliseddemographic] in myPMs telling me theyagree but don’twant to saypublicly.”Says someone’sfeelings arevalid whiletotally ignoringthem.Uses beingmarginalised indifferent areasto excusediscrimination.“You don’trepresent all[marginalisedgroup].”Emphasises hearingboth sides as thoughhistorical andcontemporary societyhasn’t erasedmarginalised voices.Backed upby theirprivilegedfriends.Tone policing/wages allyship onthe niceness of theoppressedtowards thempersonally.Uses lovedones as ashield tosupportprejudicedview.Uses reductionistdictionary definitionsof complexmanifestations ofsystemic oppressionto supportarguments.Uses their livedexperience as anoppressor toprove/perpetuatea harmfulstereotype.Fails to understandnuances/ differencesbetween individual/institutional/ systemicprejudices.Victimblaming.

Internet discrimination bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Uses the anger, frustration, and exhaustion of oppressed people to say they aren’t calm/rational/logical enough to be valid.
  2. Argues against the demographic their discrimination affects.
  3. Denial of the lived experience of the oppressed.
  4. Slippery slope fallacy/ “Where does political correctness end?”
  5. Uses slurs/incorrect terminology while insisting they’re not discriminatory.
  6. “We already have equality.”
  7. Centres themselves in the argument/ uses a personal issue to garner sympathy.
  8. Takes disagreements as attack.
  9. “Science says…” quotes from bigoted, uninformed, prejudiced science, while neglecting to acknowledge the inherent white supremacy of science.
  10. Uses helplessness in the wider issue to excuse personal inaction.
  11. Uses “feminist”/ “leftist”/ “liberal”/ “woke” or other derivatives as slurs.
  12. Unrealistic expectation on [marginalised demographic] that they don’t apply to themselves.
  13. “I have [person from marginalised demographic] in my PMs telling me they agree but don’t want to say publicly.”
  14. Says someone’s feelings are valid while totally ignoring them.
  15. Uses being marginalised in different areas to excuse discrimination.
  16. “You don’t represent all [marginalised group].”
  17. Emphasises hearing both sides as though historical and contemporary society hasn’t erased marginalised voices.
  18. Backed up by their privileged friends.
  19. Tone policing/ wages allyship on the niceness of the oppressed towards them personally.
  20. Uses loved ones as a shield to support prejudiced view.
  21. Uses reductionist dictionary definitions of complex manifestations of systemic oppression to support arguments.
  22. Uses their lived experience as an oppressor to prove/perpetuate a harmful stereotype.
  23. Fails to understand nuances/ differences between individual/ institutional/ systemic prejudices.
  24. Victim blaming.