Misinterprets research Repeats the exact same argument without ever modifying it Conflates morality with law Mildly Racist Argument Uses word incorrectly to sound smart Overused metaphor Evidence from more than 200 years ago False equivalency Ignores the Geneva Convention Advocates for genocide Judeo- Christian Values Ignores the Constitution Uses evidence that supports opposing viewpoint Cites religious text for legal argument "You bring up a good point, but..." Whataboutism Slippery Slope Ignores the question Cites a single isolated case Misinterprets terminology Ignores opponent's arguments Completely impractical proposal Plagiarizes an existing argument Doesn't understand the law Misinterprets research Repeats the exact same argument without ever modifying it Conflates morality with law Mildly Racist Argument Uses word incorrectly to sound smart Overused metaphor Evidence from more than 200 years ago False equivalency Ignores the Geneva Convention Advocates for genocide Judeo- Christian Values Ignores the Constitution Uses evidence that supports opposing viewpoint Cites religious text for legal argument "You bring up a good point, but..." Whataboutism Slippery Slope Ignores the question Cites a single isolated case Misinterprets terminology Ignores opponent's arguments Completely impractical proposal Plagiarizes an existing argument Doesn't understand the law
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Misinterprets research
Repeats the exact same argument without ever modifying it
Conflates morality with law
Mildly Racist Argument
Uses word incorrectly to sound smart
Overused metaphor
Evidence from more than 200 years ago
False equivalency
Ignores the Geneva Convention
Advocates for genocide
Judeo-Christian Values
Ignores the Constitution
Uses evidence that supports opposing viewpoint
Cites religious text for legal argument
"You bring up a good point, but..."
Whataboutism
Slippery Slope
Ignores the question
Cites a single isolated case
Misinterprets terminology
Ignores opponent's arguments
Completely impractical proposal
Plagiarizes an existing argument
Doesn't understand the law