weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak reject Great paper.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak reject Great paper.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  2. Reviews contradict each another
  3. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  4. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  5. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  6. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  7. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  8. weak reject Great paper.
  9. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  10. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  11. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  12. weak reject we don't care about humans
  13. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  14. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  15. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  16. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.