weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject Great paper.Reviewscontradicteachanothermax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject Great paper.Reviewscontradicteachanothermax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  2. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  3. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  4. weak reject we don't care about humans
  5. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  6. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  7. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  8. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  9. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  10. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  11. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  12. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  13. weak reject Great paper.
  14. Reviews contradict each another
  15. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  16. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.