Reviewscontradicteachanotherstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject Great paper.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  Reviewscontradicteachanotherstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject Great paper.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. Reviews contradict each another
  2. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  3. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  4. weak reject we don't care about humans
  5. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  6. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  7. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  8. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  9. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  10. weak reject Great paper.
  11. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  12. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  13. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  14. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  15. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  16. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs