(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
top 10% of papers
2 sentences
bottom 10% of papers
50 paragraphs
weak accept
conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
strong accept
tons of work,
simple algo,
clear results.
strong reject
paper is good but only tests on one environment.
Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
strong reject
Your human pipeline
is wrong for
these N reasons.
weak reject
tons of work,
simple algo,
clear results.
weak accept
conditional on infeasible changes.
weak reject
BC training data source \= human eval source.
Reviews contradict each another
weak reject
Great paper.
strong reject
your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
weak reject
this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
weak reject
we don't care about humans
strong accept
your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that.
Jokes. strong reject.
