weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesReviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject Great paper.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansmax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesReviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject Great paper.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansmax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  2. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  3. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  4. Reviews contradict each another
  5. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  6. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  7. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  8. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  9. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  10. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  11. weak reject Great paper.
  12. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  13. weak reject we don't care about humans
  14. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  15. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  16. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.