max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject Great paper.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject Great paper.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  2. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  3. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  4. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  5. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  6. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  7. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  8. weak reject Great paper.
  9. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  10. Reviews contradict each another
  11. weak reject we don't care about humans
  12. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  13. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  14. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  15. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  16. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs