weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject Great paper.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansReviewscontradicteachanotherbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject Great paper.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansReviewscontradicteachanotherbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  2. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  3. weak reject Great paper.
  4. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  5. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  6. weak reject we don't care about humans
  7. Reviews contradict each another
  8. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  9. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  10. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  11. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  12. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  13. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  14. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  15. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  16. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.