weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewermax(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject Great paper.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.Reviewscontradicteachanotherstrong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesbottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewermax(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject Great paper.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.Reviewscontradicteachanotherstrong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  2. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  3. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  4. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  5. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  6. weak reject we don't care about humans
  7. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  8. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  9. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  10. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  11. weak reject Great paper.
  12. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  13. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  14. Reviews contradict each another
  15. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  16. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.