strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject Great paper.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesweak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak reject Great paper.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewer

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  2. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  3. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  4. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  5. Reviews contradict each another
  6. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  7. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  8. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  9. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  10. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  11. weak reject we don't care about humans
  12. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  13. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  14. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  15. weak reject Great paper.
  16. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer