top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesmax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject Great paper.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject we don'tcare abouthumansweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.Reviewscontradicteachanothertop 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesmax(scores)-min(scores)> 7strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.strong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.strong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.strong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject Great paper.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerweak reject we don'tcare abouthumansweak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.Reviewscontradicteachanother

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  2. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  3. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  4. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  5. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  6. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  7. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  8. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  9. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  10. weak reject Great paper.
  11. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  12. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  13. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  14. weak reject we don't care about humans
  15. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  16. Reviews contradict each another