weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject Great paper.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.weak reject BC trainingdata source \=human evalsource.strong reject your baselinessuck and youshould feel bad.bottom 10% ofpapers  50 paragraphs  strong reject paper is good butonly tests on oneenvironment.Should have alsodone soccer orstarcraft or robotics.top 10% ofpapers 2 sentencesstrong reject Your humanpipelineis wrong forthese N reasons.weak accept conditionalon infeasiblechanges.weak reject this other[unrelated]paper did yourthing better.weak reject we don'tcare abouthumansstrong accept your statisticalanalysis is robust andI appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.Reviewscontradicteachanotherweak reject Great paper.weak accept conditional onciting N papersauthored by thereviewerstrong accept tons of work,simple algo,clear results.max(scores)-min(scores)> 7weak reject tons of work,simple algo,clear results.

NeurIPS - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
  1. weak reject BC training data source \= human eval source.
  2. strong reject your baselines suck and you should feel bad.
  3. bottom 10% of papers 50 paragraphs
  4. strong reject paper is good but only tests on one environment. Should have also done soccer or starcraft or robotics.
  5. top 10% of papers 2 sentences
  6. strong reject Your human pipeline is wrong for these N reasons.
  7. weak accept conditional on infeasible changes.
  8. weak reject this other [unrelated] paper did your thing better.
  9. weak reject we don't care about humans
  10. strong accept your statistical analysis is robust and I appreciate that. Jokes. strong reject.
  11. Reviews contradict each another
  12. weak reject Great paper.
  13. weak accept conditional on citing N papers authored by the reviewer
  14. strong accept tons of work, simple algo, clear results.
  15. max(scores) - min(scores) > 7
  16. weak reject tons of work, simple algo, clear results.