Strengthof Berry'sstudyPowerdistanceConclusionof Kufolskyet al studyAdvantageof Bondand smithstudyFBMFlashbulbmemoryCollectivismIndividualismResult ofBond andSmithstudyConformityEcological fallacyLimitationofHofstede'stheoryLimitationof Berry'sstudyTemne,Inuit andscottishEnomoto&GeislerResult ofKufolskyet al studyResult ofBerry'sstudyDisadvantageof studyingcultureconfederatesQuestionnaireCulturaldimensionsAim ofBerry'sstudyChinese,German,andTurkishKufolskyet almeta-analysisStrengthof Berry'sstudyPowerdistanceConclusionof Kufolskyet al studyAdvantageof Bondand smithstudyFBMFlashbulbmemoryCollectivismIndividualismResult ofBond andSmithstudyConformityEcological fallacyLimitationofHofstede'stheoryLimitationof Berry'sstudyTemne,Inuit andscottishEnomoto&GeislerResult ofKufolskyet al studyResult ofBerry'sstudyDisadvantageof studyingcultureconfederatesQuestionnaireCulturaldimensionsAim ofBerry'sstudyChinese,German,andTurkishKufolskyet almeta-analysis

Culture dimensions and behaviour - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. Strength of Berry's study
  2. Power distance
  3. Conclusion of Kufolsky et al study
  4. Advantage of Bond and smith study
  5. FBM Flashbulb memory
  6. Collectivism
  7. Individualism
  8. Result of Bond and Smith study
  9. Conformity
  10. Ecological fallacy
  11. Limitation of Hofstede's theory
  12. Limitation of Berry's study
  13. Temne, Inuit and scottish
  15. Enomoto & Geisler
  16. Result of Kufolsky et al study
  17. Result of Berry's study
  18. Disadvantage of studying culture
  19. confederates
  20. Questionnaire
  21. Cultural dimensions
  22. Aim of Berry's study
  23. Chinese, German, and Turkish
  24. Kufolsky et al
  25. meta-analysis