Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)"Themesemerged"Morethan 6themesMentionof"bias"Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsNoreflexivityUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themesare topicsummariesNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use of acodebookVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityClarkespelled asClark (noe)Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)"Themesemerged"Morethan 6themesMentionof"bias"Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsNoreflexivityUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themesare topicsummariesNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use of acodebookVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMention of alack of(statistical)generalisability

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  2. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  3. "Themes emerged"
  4. More than 6 themes
  5. Mention of "bias"
  6. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  7. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  8. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  9. No reflexivity
  10. Use of passive voice
  11. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  12. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  13. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  14. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  15. Themes are topic summaries
  16. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  17. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  18. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  19. Use of a codebook
  20. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  21. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  22. More than 3 levels of themes
  23. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  24. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability