Themesare topicsummariesBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesMorethan 6themesClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionof"bias"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretation"Themesemerged"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’NoreflexivityVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Use ofpassivevoiceUse of acodebookThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Themesare topicsummariesBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesMorethan 6themesClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionof"bias"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretation"Themesemerged"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’NoreflexivityVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Use ofpassivevoiceUse of acodebookThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Themes are topic summaries
  2. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  3. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  4. More than 3 levels of themes
  5. More than 6 themes
  6. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  7. Mention of "bias"
  8. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  9. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  10. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  11. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  12. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  13. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  14. "Themes emerged"
  15. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  16. No reflexivity
  17. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  18. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  19. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  20. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  21. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  22. Use of passive voice
  23. Use of a codebook
  24. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)