BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)"Themesemerged"No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreUse ofpassivevoiceDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Themesare topicsummariesUse of acodebookData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesClarkespelled asClark (noe)More than3 levels ofthemesMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNoreflexivityImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)"Themesemerged"No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreUse ofpassivevoiceDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Themesare topicsummariesUse of acodebookData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesClarkespelled asClark (noe)More than3 levels ofthemesMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNoreflexivityImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  2. "Themes emerged"
  3. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  4. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  5. Use of passive voice
  6. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  7. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  8. Mention of "bias"
  9. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  10. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  11. Themes are topic summaries
  12. Use of a codebook
  13. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  14. More than 6 themes
  15. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  16. More than 3 levels of themes
  17. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  18. No reflexivity
  19. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  20. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  21. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  22. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  23. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  24. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)