No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMentionsinter-coderreliabilityUse ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationUse of acodebookImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Morethan 6themesNoreflexivityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias""Themesemerged"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’More than3 levels ofthemesThemesare topicsummariesNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMentionsinter-coderreliabilityUse ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationUse of acodebookImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Morethan 6themesNoreflexivityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias""Themesemerged"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’More than3 levels ofthemesThemesare topicsummaries

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  2. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  3. Use of passive voice
  4. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  5. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  6. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  7. Use of a codebook
  8. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  9. More than 6 themes
  10. No reflexivity
  11. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  12. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  13. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  14. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  15. Mention of "bias"
  16. "Themes emerged"
  17. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  18. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  19. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  20. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  21. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  22. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  23. More than 3 levels of themes
  24. Themes are topic summaries