Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesUse of acodebookBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemesare topicsummaries"Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)NoreflexivityUse ofpassivevoiceMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesUse of acodebookBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMentionof"bias"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemesare topicsummaries"Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)NoreflexivityUse ofpassivevoice

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  2. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  3. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  4. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  5. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  6. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  7. More than 3 levels of themes
  8. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  9. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  10. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  11. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  12. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  13. More than 6 themes
  14. Use of a codebook
  15. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  16. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  17. Mention of "bias"
  18. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  19. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  20. Themes are topic summaries
  21. "Themes emerged"
  22. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  23. No reflexivity
  24. Use of passive voice