Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsUse of acodebookNoreflexivityNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Themesare topicsummariesImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesMentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliability"Themesemerged"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsUse of acodebookNoreflexivityNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)More than3 levels ofthemesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Themesare topicsummariesImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMorethan 6themesMentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Mentionsinter-coderreliability"Themesemerged"

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  2. Use of a codebook
  3. No reflexivity
  4. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  5. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  6. More than 3 levels of themes
  7. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  8. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  9. Themes are topic summaries
  10. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  11. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  12. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  13. More than 6 themes
  14. Mention of "bias"
  15. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  16. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  17. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  18. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  19. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  20. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  21. Use of passive voice
  22. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  23. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  24. "Themes emerged"