Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationUse of acodebookImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)More than3 levels ofthemesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismClarkespelled asClark (noe)Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNoreflexivityMentionsinter-coderreliabilityDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionof"bias"No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityUse ofpassivevoiceThemesare topicsummariesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreMorethan 6themes"Themesemerged"Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationUse of acodebookImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)More than3 levels ofthemesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismClarkespelled asClark (noe)Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNoreflexivityMentionsinter-coderreliabilityDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionof"bias"No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityUse ofpassivevoiceThemesare topicsummariesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreMorethan 6themes"Themesemerged"

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  2. Use of a codebook
  3. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  4. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  5. More than 3 levels of themes
  6. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  7. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  8. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  9. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  10. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  11. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  12. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  13. No reflexivity
  14. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  15. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  16. Mention of "bias"
  17. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  18. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  19. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  20. Use of passive voice
  21. Themes are topic summaries
  22. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  23. More than 6 themes
  24. "Themes emerged"