Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Use of acodebookUse ofpassivevoiceVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMore than3 levels ofthemesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMentionof"bias""Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsThemesare topicsummariesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityNoreflexivityBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Use of acodebookUse ofpassivevoiceVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMore than3 levels ofthemesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Themes donot have acentralorganisingconceptData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMentionof"bias""Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsThemesare topicsummariesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityNoreflexivityBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  2. Use of a codebook
  3. Use of passive voice
  4. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  5. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  6. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  7. More than 6 themes
  8. More than 3 levels of themes
  9. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  10. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  11. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  12. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  13. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  14. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  15. Mention of "bias"
  16. "Themes emerged"
  17. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  18. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  19. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  20. Themes are topic summaries
  21. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  22. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  23. No reflexivity
  24. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)