Themesare topicsummariesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)NoreflexivityUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)"Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Use of acodebookThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMorethan 6themesThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionof"bias"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use ofpassivevoiceData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliabilityThemesare topicsummariesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)NoreflexivityUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)"Themesemerged"Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Use of acodebookThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMorethan 6themesThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionof"bias"Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use ofpassivevoiceData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliability

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Themes are topic summaries
  2. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  3. More than 3 levels of themes
  4. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  5. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  6. No reflexivity
  7. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  8. "Themes emerged"
  9. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  10. Use of a codebook
  11. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  12. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  13. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  14. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  15. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  16. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  17. More than 6 themes
  18. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  19. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  20. Mention of "bias"
  21. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  22. Use of passive voice
  23. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  24. Mentions inter-coder reliability