Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Themesare topicsummariesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use of acodebookClarkespelled asClark (noe)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretation"Themesemerged"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesNoreflexivityMentionof"bias"BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismUse ofpassivevoiceImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Themesare topicsummariesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use of acodebookClarkespelled asClark (noe)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretation"Themesemerged"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesNoreflexivityMentionof"bias"BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMention of alack of(statistical)generalisability

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  2. Use of passive voice
  3. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  4. Themes are topic summaries
  5. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  6. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  7. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  8. Use of a codebook
  9. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  10. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  11. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  12. "Themes emerged"
  13. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  14. More than 3 levels of themes
  15. No reflexivity
  16. Mention of "bias"
  17. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  18. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  19. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  20. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  21. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  22. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  23. More than 6 themes
  24. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability