Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Use ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themesare topicsummariesData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesNoreflexivityMorethan 6themes"Themesemerged"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMentionsinter-coderreliabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use of acodebookMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Use ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Themesare topicsummariesData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesNoreflexivityMorethan 6themes"Themesemerged"Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMentionsinter-coderreliabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use of acodebookMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  2. Use of passive voice
  3. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  4. Themes are topic summaries
  5. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  6. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  7. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  8. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  9. More than 3 levels of themes
  10. No reflexivity
  11. More than 6 themes
  12. "Themes emerged"
  13. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  14. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  15. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  16. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  17. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  18. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  19. Use of a codebook
  20. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  21. Mention of "bias"
  22. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  23. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  24. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)