OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNoreflexivityMorethan 6themesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use of acodebookThemesare topicsummariesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMentionof"bias"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedNoreflexivityMorethan 6themesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use of acodebookThemesare topicsummariesVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliabilityMore than3 levels ofthemesDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Use ofpassivevoiceBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismMentionof"bias"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)No theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruth

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  2. No reflexivity
  3. More than 6 themes
  4. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  5. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  6. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  7. Use of a codebook
  8. Themes are topic summaries
  9. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  10. "Themes emerged"
  11. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  12. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  13. More than 3 levels of themes
  14. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  15. Use of passive voice
  16. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  17. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  18. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  19. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  20. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  21. Mention of "bias"
  22. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  23. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  24. No theory of language – treated as window to truth