Use ofpassivevoiceVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"Use of acodebookThemesare topicsummariesMore than3 levels ofthemesThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMentionof"bias"Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMorethan 6themesNoreflexivityUse ofpassivevoiceVery fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"Use of acodebookThemesare topicsummariesMore than3 levels ofthemesThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMentionof"bias"Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismClarkespelled asClark (noe)Mentionsinter-coderreliabilityBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)OnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)Unacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Mismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsImplicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptMorethan 6themesNoreflexivity

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Use of passive voice
  2. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  3. "Themes emerged"
  4. Use of a codebook
  5. Themes are topic summaries
  6. More than 3 levels of themes
  7. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  8. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  9. Mention of "bias"
  10. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  11. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  12. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  13. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  14. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  15. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  16. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  17. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  18. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  19. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  20. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  21. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  22. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  23. More than 6 themes
  24. No reflexivity