Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMorethan 6themesNoreflexivityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliabilityImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Use of acodebookDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use ofpassivevoiceThemesare topicsummariesMentionof"bias"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"Clarkespelled asClark (noe)Mention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityMorethan 6themesNoreflexivityMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsMessy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedData is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationMentionsinter-coderreliabilityImplicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesThemes donot have acentralorganisingconceptUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)BraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Use of acodebookDatacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Themes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Use ofpassivevoiceThemesare topicsummariesMentionof"bias"Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or more"Themesemerged"

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  2. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  3. More than 6 themes
  4. No reflexivity
  5. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  6. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  7. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  8. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  9. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  10. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  11. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)
  12. More than 3 levels of themes
  13. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  14. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  15. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  16. Use of a codebook
  17. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  18. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  19. Use of passive voice
  20. Themes are topic summaries
  21. Mention of "bias"
  22. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  23. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  24. "Themes emerged"