More than3 levels ofthemesUse ofpassivevoiceUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes donot have acentralorganisingconcept"Themesemerged"Use of acodebookNoreflexivityMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemesare topicsummariesMentionsinter-coderreliabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsClarkespelled asClark (noe)Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)More than3 levels ofthemesUse ofpassivevoiceUnacknowledgedsocial cognitions(e.g. attitudes orbody image)Datacollectionstopped at‘saturation’Mentionof"bias"Very fewparticipantsquoted/over-quoting ofone or moreThemes donot have acentralorganisingconcept"Themesemerged"Use of acodebookNoreflexivityMention of alack of(statistical)generalisabilityThemesare topicsummariesMentionsinter-coderreliabilityOnlyBraun &Clarke2006 citedThemes arethin - just asingle idea(a code)Messy mix ofrealism andconstructionismNo theory oflanguage –treated aswindow totruthMorethan 6themesMismatchbetweenextracts andanalyticclaimsClarkespelled asClark (noe)Implicitly(post)positivistTA (notacknowledged)Data is justparaphrasedwithoutinterpretationBraunpronouncedBRAWN (notBrown)Implicitlyrealist TA (notacknowledged)

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. More than 3 levels of themes
  2. Use of passive voice
  3. Unacknowledged social cognitions (e.g. attitudes or body image)
  4. Data collection stopped at ‘saturation’
  5. Mention of "bias"
  6. Very few participants quoted/over-quoting of one or more
  7. Themes do not have a central organising concept
  8. "Themes emerged"
  9. Use of a codebook
  10. No reflexivity
  11. Mention of a lack of (statistical) generalisability
  12. Themes are topic summaries
  13. Mentions inter-coder reliability
  14. Only Braun & Clarke 2006 cited
  15. Themes are thin - just a single idea (a code)
  16. Messy mix of realism and constructionism
  17. No theory of language – treated as window to truth
  18. More than 6 themes
  19. Mismatch between extracts and analytic claims
  20. Clarke spelled as Clark (no e)
  21. Implicitly (post)positivist TA (not acknowledged)
  22. Data is just paraphrased without interpretation
  23. Braun pronounced BRAWN (not Brown)
  24. Implicitly realist TA (not acknowledged)