they'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsmostsentencesare run-onsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsstoned ordrunkpapernoindent/linebreaksplagiarismhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoicewaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyriddledwithtyposinsanesourcesintro hookthatmakes nosensenoargumentnoprimarysourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoanalysisjustsummaryunintelligibleargumentwrongcitationformatcites bookreviews assecondarysourcenohistoriographyincomprehensiblegrammarthey'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsmostsentencesare run-onsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsstoned ordrunkpapernoindent/linebreaksplagiarismhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoicewaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyriddledwithtyposinsanesourcesintro hookthatmakes nosensenoargumentnoprimarysourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoanalysisjustsummaryunintelligibleargumentwrongcitationformatcites bookreviews assecondarysourcenohistoriographyincomprehensiblegrammar

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. they're reaching, your honour
  2. paper from other subject posing as history
  3. trying to badly justify a political position
  4. no citations
  5. most sentences are run-ons
  6. evidence doesn't support points
  7. stoned or drunk paper
  8. no indent/line breaks
  9. plagiarism
  10. huge quotes to waste space
  11. almost wholly in passive voice
  12. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  13. riddled with typos
  14. insane sources
  15. intro hook that makes no sense
  16. no argument
  17. no primary sources
  18. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  19. no analysis just summary
  20. unintelligible argument
  21. wrong citation format
  22. cites book reviews as secondary source
  23. no historiography
  24. incomprehensible grammar