nocitationstrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosensewrongcitationformatincomprehensiblegrammarthey'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynoargumentnoanalysisjustsummarycites bookreviews assecondarysourcewikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespacenoprimarysourcesstoned ordrunkpaperinsanesourcesplagiarismunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographywaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoindent/linebreaksevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsriddledwithtyposalmostwholly inpassivevoicenocitationstrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosensewrongcitationformatincomprehensiblegrammarthey'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynoargumentnoanalysisjustsummarycites bookreviews assecondarysourcewikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespacenoprimarysourcesstoned ordrunkpaperinsanesourcesplagiarismunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographywaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoindent/linebreaksevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsriddledwithtyposalmostwholly inpassivevoice

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. no citations
  2. trying to badly justify a political position
  3. intro hook that makes no sense
  4. wrong citation format
  5. incomprehensible grammar
  6. they're reaching, your honour
  7. paper from other subject posing as history
  8. no argument
  9. no analysis just summary
  10. cites book reviews as secondary source
  11. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  12. most sentences are run-ons
  13. huge quotes to waste space
  14. no primary sources
  15. stoned or drunk paper
  16. insane sources
  17. plagiarism
  18. unintelligible argument
  19. no historiography
  20. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  21. no indent/line breaks
  22. evidence doesn't support points
  23. riddled with typos
  24. almost wholly in passive voice