intro hookthatmakes nosensenoindent/linebreaksinsanesourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoiceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsthey'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynohistoriographystoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoanalysisjustsummarynoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoargumentcites bookreviews assecondarysourceplagiarismhugequotes towastespacewrongcitationformatmostsentencesare run-onsnocitationsincomprehensiblegrammarriddledwithtyposintro hookthatmakes nosensenoindent/linebreaksinsanesourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoiceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsthey'rereaching,yourhonourpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynohistoriographystoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoanalysisjustsummarynoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoargumentcites bookreviews assecondarysourceplagiarismhugequotes towastespacewrongcitationformatmostsentencesare run-onsnocitationsincomprehensiblegrammarriddledwithtypos

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. intro hook that makes no sense
  2. no indent/line breaks
  3. insane sources
  4. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  5. unintelligible argument
  6. almost wholly in passive voice
  7. evidence doesn't support points
  8. they're reaching, your honour
  9. paper from other subject posing as history
  10. no historiography
  11. stoned or drunk paper
  12. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  13. no analysis just summary
  14. no primary sources
  15. trying to badly justify a political position
  16. no argument
  17. cites book reviews as secondary source
  18. plagiarism
  19. huge quotes to waste space
  20. wrong citation format
  21. most sentences are run-ons
  22. no citations
  23. incomprehensible grammar
  24. riddled with typos