waxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyalmostwholly inpassivevoiceriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalcites bookreviews assecondarysourceunintelligibleargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryincomprehensiblegrammarstoned ordrunkpaperhugequotes towastespaceplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsthey'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformatinsanesourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryintro hookthatmakes nosensetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsnoindent/linebreaksnohistoriographynoargumentwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyalmostwholly inpassivevoiceriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalcites bookreviews assecondarysourceunintelligibleargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryincomprehensiblegrammarstoned ordrunkpaperhugequotes towastespaceplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsthey'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformatinsanesourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryintro hookthatmakes nosensetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsnoindent/linebreaksnohistoriographynoargument

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  2. almost wholly in passive voice
  3. riddled with typos
  4. no primary sources
  5. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  6. cites book reviews as secondary source
  7. unintelligible argument
  8. paper from other subject posing as history
  9. incomprehensible grammar
  10. stoned or drunk paper
  11. huge quotes to waste space
  12. plagiarism
  13. most sentences are run-ons
  14. they're reaching, your honour
  15. evidence doesn't support points
  16. wrong citation format
  17. insane sources
  18. no analysis just summary
  19. intro hook that makes no sense
  20. trying to badly justify a political position
  21. no citations
  22. no indent/line breaks
  23. no historiography
  24. no argument