wikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etaltrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographynoprimarysourcesriddledwithtyposwrongcitationformatwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historycites bookreviews assecondarysourceincomprehensiblegrammarnoargumentstoned ordrunkpapernocitationsinsanesourcesmostsentencesare run-onsplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacenoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etaltrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographynoprimarysourcesriddledwithtyposwrongcitationformatwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historycites bookreviews assecondarysourceincomprehensiblegrammarnoargumentstoned ordrunkpapernocitationsinsanesourcesmostsentencesare run-onsplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacenoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpoints

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  2. trying to badly justify a political position
  3. unintelligible argument
  4. no historiography
  5. no primary sources
  6. riddled with typos
  7. wrong citation format
  8. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  9. cites book reviews as secondary source
  10. incomprehensible grammar
  11. no argument
  12. stoned or drunk paper
  13. no citations
  14. insane sources
  15. most sentences are run-ons
  16. plagiarism
  17. intro hook that makes no sense
  18. paper from other subject posing as history
  19. almost wholly in passive voice
  20. no analysis just summary
  21. huge quotes to waste space
  22. no indent/line breaks
  23. they're reaching, your honour
  24. evidence doesn't support points