intro hookthatmakes nosensetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryincomprehensiblegrammarplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historycites bookreviews assecondarysourceunintelligibleargumentnoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonournocitationsinsanesourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoargumenthugequotes towastespacestoned ordrunkpaperevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographywrongcitationformatwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalriddledwithtyposnoanalysisjustsummaryintro hookthatmakes nosensetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryincomprehensiblegrammarplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historycites bookreviews assecondarysourceunintelligibleargumentnoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonournocitationsinsanesourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoargumenthugequotes towastespacestoned ordrunkpaperevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographywrongcitationformatwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalriddledwithtyposnoanalysisjustsummary

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. intro hook that makes no sense
  2. trying to badly justify a political position
  3. paper from other subject posing as history
  4. incomprehensible grammar
  5. plagiarism
  6. most sentences are run-ons
  7. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  8. cites book reviews as secondary source
  9. unintelligible argument
  10. no primary sources
  11. no indent/line breaks
  12. they're reaching, your honour
  13. no citations
  14. insane sources
  15. almost wholly in passive voice
  16. no argument
  17. huge quotes to waste space
  18. stoned or drunk paper
  19. evidence doesn't support points
  20. no historiography
  21. wrong citation format
  22. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  23. riddled with typos
  24. no analysis just summary