unintelligibleargumentmostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyhugequotes towastespaceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoargumentnocitationswrongcitationformatinsanesourcesnohistoriographynoanalysisjustsummaryintro hookthatmakes nosensewikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalplagiarismtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoprimarysourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourincomprehensiblegrammarnoindent/linebreakspaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryriddledwithtyposcites bookreviews assecondarysourceunintelligibleargumentmostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyhugequotes towastespaceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoargumentnocitationswrongcitationformatinsanesourcesnohistoriographynoanalysisjustsummaryintro hookthatmakes nosensewikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalplagiarismtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoprimarysourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourincomprehensiblegrammarnoindent/linebreakspaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryriddledwithtyposcites bookreviews assecondarysource

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. unintelligible argument
  2. most sentences are run-ons
  3. stoned or drunk paper
  4. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  5. huge quotes to waste space
  6. evidence doesn't support points
  7. no argument
  8. no citations
  9. wrong citation format
  10. insane sources
  11. no historiography
  12. no analysis just summary
  13. intro hook that makes no sense
  14. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  15. plagiarism
  16. trying to badly justify a political position
  17. no primary sources
  18. almost wholly in passive voice
  19. they're reaching, your honour
  20. incomprehensible grammar
  21. no indent/line breaks
  22. paper from other subject posing as history
  23. riddled with typos
  24. cites book reviews as secondary source