cites bookreviews assecondarysourcenocitationsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographyalmostwholly inpassivevoicemostsentencesare run-onsnoindent/linebreaksincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatthey'rereaching,yourhonourunintelligibleargumentinsanesourceswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoanalysisjustsummaryriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacenoargumentstoned ordrunkpapernoprimarysourcescites bookreviews assecondarysourcenocitationsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographyalmostwholly inpassivevoicemostsentencesare run-onsnoindent/linebreaksincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatthey'rereaching,yourhonourunintelligibleargumentinsanesourceswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnoanalysisjustsummaryriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacenoargumentstoned ordrunkpapernoprimarysources

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. cites book reviews as secondary source
  2. no citations
  3. evidence doesn't support points
  4. no historiography
  5. almost wholly in passive voice
  6. most sentences are run-ons
  7. no indent/line breaks
  8. incomprehensible grammar
  9. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  10. plagiarism
  11. intro hook that makes no sense
  12. paper from other subject posing as history
  13. wrong citation format
  14. they're reaching, your honour
  15. unintelligible argument
  16. insane sources
  17. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  18. trying to badly justify a political position
  19. no analysis just summary
  20. riddled with typos
  21. huge quotes to waste space
  22. no argument
  23. stoned or drunk paper
  24. no primary sources