paper fromother subjectposing ashistorymostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpapernoargumentriddledwithtyposwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsalmostwholly inpassivevoiceinsanesourcescites bookreviews assecondarysourcenoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacenoprimarysourceswrongcitationformatnoindent/linebreakstrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionunintelligibleargumentnocitationsplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalthey'rereaching,yourhonournohistoriographypaper fromother subjectposing ashistorymostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpapernoargumentriddledwithtyposwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsalmostwholly inpassivevoiceinsanesourcescites bookreviews assecondarysourcenoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacenoprimarysourceswrongcitationformatnoindent/linebreakstrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionunintelligibleargumentnocitationsplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalthey'rereaching,yourhonournohistoriography

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. paper from other subject posing as history
  2. most sentences are run-ons
  3. stoned or drunk paper
  4. no argument
  5. riddled with typos
  6. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  7. intro hook that makes no sense
  8. incomprehensible grammar
  9. evidence doesn't support points
  10. almost wholly in passive voice
  11. insane sources
  12. cites book reviews as secondary source
  13. no analysis just summary
  14. huge quotes to waste space
  15. no primary sources
  16. wrong citation format
  17. no indent/line breaks
  18. trying to badly justify a political position
  19. unintelligible argument
  20. no citations
  21. plagiarism
  22. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  23. they're reaching, your honour
  24. no historiography