intro hook that makes no sense no indent/line breaks insane sources wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al unintelligible argument almost wholly in passive voice evidence doesn't support points they're reaching, your honour paper from other subject posing as history no historiography stoned or drunk paper waxing poetic about the meaning of history no analysis just summary no primary sources trying to badly justify a political position no argument cites book reviews as secondary source plagiarism huge quotes to waste space wrong citation format most sentences are run- ons no citations incomprehensible grammar riddled with typos intro hook that makes no sense no indent/line breaks insane sources wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al unintelligible argument almost wholly in passive voice evidence doesn't support points they're reaching, your honour paper from other subject posing as history no historiography stoned or drunk paper waxing poetic about the meaning of history no analysis just summary no primary sources trying to badly justify a political position no argument cites book reviews as secondary source plagiarism huge quotes to waste space wrong citation format most sentences are run- ons no citations incomprehensible grammar riddled with typos
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
intro hook that makes no sense
no indent/line breaks
insane sources
wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
unintelligible argument
almost wholly in passive voice
evidence doesn't support points
they're reaching, your honour
paper from other subject posing as history
no historiography
stoned or drunk paper
waxing poetic about the meaning of history
no analysis just summary
no primary sources
trying to badly justify a political position
no argument
cites book reviews as secondary source
plagiarism
huge quotes to waste space
wrong citation format
most sentences are run-ons
no citations
incomprehensible grammar
riddled with typos