nohistoriographyunintelligibleargumentcites bookreviews assecondarysourcetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoargumentnoprimarysourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryinsanesourcesnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourmostsentencesare run-onsplagiarismpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosensestoned ordrunkpaperriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoiceincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformatnohistoriographyunintelligibleargumentcites bookreviews assecondarysourcetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historynoargumentnoprimarysourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryinsanesourcesnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourmostsentencesare run-onsplagiarismpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosensestoned ordrunkpaperriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoiceincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformat

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. no historiography
  2. unintelligible argument
  3. cites book reviews as secondary source
  4. trying to badly justify a political position
  5. no citations
  6. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  7. no argument
  8. no primary sources
  9. no analysis just summary
  10. insane sources
  11. no indent/line breaks
  12. they're reaching, your honour
  13. most sentences are run-ons
  14. plagiarism
  15. paper from other subject posing as history
  16. intro hook that makes no sense
  17. stoned or drunk paper
  18. riddled with typos
  19. huge quotes to waste space
  20. almost wholly in passive voice
  21. incomprehensible grammar
  22. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  23. evidence doesn't support points
  24. wrong citation format