waxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyriddledwithtyposnoindent/linebreakshugequotes towastespacemostsentencesare run-onsnoargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourcenoanalysisjustsummaryalmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourunintelligibleargumentincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourcesnohistoriographynoprimarysourceswrongcitationformattrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionstoned ordrunkpaperevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsplagiarismwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyriddledwithtyposnoindent/linebreakshugequotes towastespacemostsentencesare run-onsnoargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourcenoanalysisjustsummaryalmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourunintelligibleargumentincomprehensiblegrammarwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourcesnohistoriographynoprimarysourceswrongcitationformattrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionstoned ordrunkpaperevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsplagiarism

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  2. riddled with typos
  3. no indent/line breaks
  4. huge quotes to waste space
  5. most sentences are run-ons
  6. no argument
  7. paper from other subject posing as history
  8. no citations
  9. cites book reviews as secondary source
  10. no analysis just summary
  11. almost wholly in passive voice
  12. they're reaching, your honour
  13. unintelligible argument
  14. incomprehensible grammar
  15. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  16. intro hook that makes no sense
  17. insane sources
  18. no historiography
  19. no primary sources
  20. wrong citation format
  21. trying to badly justify a political position
  22. stoned or drunk paper
  23. evidence doesn't support points
  24. plagiarism