intro hookthatmakes nosenseunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoanalysisjustsummarystoned ordrunkpaperinsanesourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonournocitationshugequotes towastespacenoargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historywrongcitationformatriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourcescites bookreviews assecondarysourceincomprehensiblegrammarmostsentencesare run-onsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoindent/linebreaksintro hookthatmakes nosenseunintelligibleargumentnohistoriographytrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoanalysisjustsummarystoned ordrunkpaperinsanesourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonournocitationshugequotes towastespacenoargumentpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historywrongcitationformatriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourcescites bookreviews assecondarysourceincomprehensiblegrammarmostsentencesare run-onsevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoindent/linebreaks

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. intro hook that makes no sense
  2. unintelligible argument
  3. no historiography
  4. trying to badly justify a political position
  5. almost wholly in passive voice
  6. no analysis just summary
  7. stoned or drunk paper
  8. insane sources
  9. they're reaching, your honour
  10. no citations
  11. huge quotes to waste space
  12. no argument
  13. paper from other subject posing as history
  14. plagiarism
  15. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  16. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  17. wrong citation format
  18. riddled with typos
  19. no primary sources
  20. cites book reviews as secondary source
  21. incomprehensible grammar
  22. most sentences are run-ons
  23. evidence doesn't support points
  24. no indent/line breaks