wrongcitationformatunintelligibleargumentriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonourwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargumentplagiarismalmostwholly inpassivevoiceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointscites bookreviews assecondarysourcenocitationsnoindent/linebreaksmostsentencesare run-onsnoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourcesincomprehensiblegrammarnohistoriographystoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historypaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatunintelligibleargumentriddledwithtyposnoprimarysourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonourwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargumentplagiarismalmostwholly inpassivevoiceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointscites bookreviews assecondarysourcenocitationsnoindent/linebreaksmostsentencesare run-onsnoanalysisjustsummaryhugequotes towastespacetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourcesincomprehensiblegrammarnohistoriographystoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historypaper fromother subjectposing ashistory

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. wrong citation format
  2. unintelligible argument
  3. riddled with typos
  4. no primary sources
  5. they're reaching, your honour
  6. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  7. no argument
  8. plagiarism
  9. almost wholly in passive voice
  10. evidence doesn't support points
  11. cites book reviews as secondary source
  12. no citations
  13. no indent/line breaks
  14. most sentences are run-ons
  15. no analysis just summary
  16. huge quotes to waste space
  17. trying to badly justify a political position
  18. intro hook that makes no sense
  19. insane sources
  20. incomprehensible grammar
  21. no historiography
  22. stoned or drunk paper
  23. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  24. paper from other subject posing as history