waxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyplagiarismunintelligibleargumentnocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreakswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargumentmostsentencesare run-onsriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositioninsanesourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarnohistoriographynoanalysisjustsummarystoned ordrunkpaperwaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historyplagiarismunintelligibleargumentnocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourceevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreakswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargumentmostsentencesare run-onsriddledwithtyposhugequotes towastespacealmostwholly inpassivevoicethey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositioninsanesourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarnohistoriographynoanalysisjustsummarystoned ordrunkpaper

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  2. plagiarism
  3. unintelligible argument
  4. no citations
  5. cites book reviews as secondary source
  6. evidence doesn't support points
  7. no primary sources
  8. no indent/line breaks
  9. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  10. no argument
  11. most sentences are run-ons
  12. riddled with typos
  13. huge quotes to waste space
  14. almost wholly in passive voice
  15. they're reaching, your honour
  16. trying to badly justify a political position
  17. insane sources
  18. paper from other subject posing as history
  19. wrong citation format
  20. intro hook that makes no sense
  21. incomprehensible grammar
  22. no historiography
  23. no analysis just summary
  24. stoned or drunk paper