they'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsplagiarismnoprimarysourcesunintelligibleargumenthugequotes towastespaceincomprehensiblegrammarnoanalysisjustsummarymostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpaperalmostwholly inpassivevoiceriddledwithtyposnoindent/linebreaksintro hookthatmakes nosensenohistoriographynocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourcetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositioninsanesourceswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historypaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargumentthey'rereaching,yourhonourevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsplagiarismnoprimarysourcesunintelligibleargumenthugequotes towastespaceincomprehensiblegrammarnoanalysisjustsummarymostsentencesare run-onsstoned ordrunkpaperalmostwholly inpassivevoiceriddledwithtyposnoindent/linebreaksintro hookthatmakes nosensenohistoriographynocitationscites bookreviews assecondarysourcetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositioninsanesourceswaxingpoetic aboutthe meaningof historypaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalnoargument

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. they're reaching, your honour
  2. evidence doesn't support points
  3. plagiarism
  4. no primary sources
  5. unintelligible argument
  6. huge quotes to waste space
  7. incomprehensible grammar
  8. no analysis just summary
  9. most sentences are run-ons
  10. stoned or drunk paper
  11. almost wholly in passive voice
  12. riddled with typos
  13. no indent/line breaks
  14. intro hook that makes no sense
  15. no historiography
  16. no citations
  17. cites book reviews as secondary source
  18. trying to badly justify a political position
  19. insane sources
  20. waxing poetic about the meaning of history
  21. paper from other subject posing as history
  22. wrong citation format
  23. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  24. no argument