(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
This researcher has political opinions
This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
So you believe there's a conspiracy?
(What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Correlation does not equal causation
“There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
These thousands of reports are anecdotal
This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
More research is necessary
Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled
Trust the science! (No, not this one)
Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
LOL
... (pretends nothing happened)
Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?
Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong
These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
