So youbelievethere's aconspiracy?This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsLOLThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMoreresearchisnecessaryEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mine“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)Trust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thesethousands ofreports areanecdotalTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senile...(pretendsnothinghappened)Correlationdoes notequalcausationResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)Some similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istoo(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?Some similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsLOLThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMoreresearchisnecessaryEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mine“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)Trust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thesethousands ofreports areanecdotalTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senile...(pretendsnothinghappened)Correlationdoes notequalcausationResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)Some similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istoo(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?Some similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooled

FACT CHECKER'S - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. So you believe there's a conspiracy?
  2. This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
  3. If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
  4. This researcher has political opinions
  5. This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
  6. This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
  7. LOL
  8. These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
  9. More research is necessary
  10. Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
  11. This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
  12. Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
  13. “There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
  14. Trust the science! (No, not this one)
  15. These thousands of reports are anecdotal
  16. The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong
  17. The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
  18. ... (pretends nothing happened)
  19. Correlation does not equal causation
  20. Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
  21. Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
  22. (What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  23. Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?
  24. Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled