Thisresearcherhas politicalopinionsLOLTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thing...(pretendsnothinghappened)(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeaths“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)Meta-analyses canbe biased,except mineCorrelationdoes notequalcausationThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)The researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?These dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMoreresearchisnecessaryTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)If I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsThis researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?Thisresearcherhas politicalopinionsLOLTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thing...(pretendsnothinghappened)(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeaths“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)Meta-analyses canbe biased,except mineCorrelationdoes notequalcausationThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)The researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?These dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMoreresearchisnecessaryTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)If I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsThis researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?

FACT CHECKER'S - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. This researcher has political opinions
  2. LOL
  3. The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong
  4. This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
  5. ... (pretends nothing happened)
  6. (What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  7. Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
  8. Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
  9. “There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
  10. Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
  11. Correlation does not equal causation
  12. This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
  13. Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
  14. The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
  15. Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?
  16. These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
  17. More research is necessary
  18. Trust the science! (No, not this one)
  19. If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
  20. This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
  21. This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
  22. Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled
  23. These thousands of reports are anecdotal
  24. So you believe there's a conspiracy?