Some similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?Trust thescience!(No, notthis one)This researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginal...(pretendsnothinghappened)Eroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?MoreresearchisnecessaryMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mine(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingCorrelationdoes notequalcausationResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)These dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallLOLSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooled“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?Trust thescience!(No, notthis one)This researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginal...(pretendsnothinghappened)Eroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?MoreresearchisnecessaryMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mine(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceThis newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingCorrelationdoes notequalcausationResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)These dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallLOLSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooled“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrong

FACT CHECKER'S - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
  2. This researcher has political opinions
  3. This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
  4. If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
  5. So you believe there's a conspiracy?
  6. Trust the science! (No, not this one)
  7. This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
  8. ... (pretends nothing happened)
  9. Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
  10. The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
  11. Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?
  12. More research is necessary
  13. Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
  14. (What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  15. This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
  16. Correlation does not equal causation
  17. Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
  18. These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
  19. LOL
  20. Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled
  21. “There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
  22. This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
  23. These thousands of reports are anecdotal
  24. The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong