Eroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsLOLSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mineIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientMoreresearchisnecessaryWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?This researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThis researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)This newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceCorrelationdoes notequalcausation...(pretendsnothinghappened)Eroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsLOLSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mineIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientMoreresearchisnecessaryWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?This researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsThis researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsResearch hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)This newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thingThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceCorrelationdoes notequalcausation...(pretendsnothinghappened)

FACT CHECKER'S - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
  2. LOL
  3. Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
  4. These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
  5. Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
  6. If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
  7. More research is necessary
  8. Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?
  9. This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
  10. This researcher has political opinions
  11. This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
  12. Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled
  13. The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong
  14. Trust the science! (No, not this one)
  15. This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
  16. Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
  17. This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
  18. These thousands of reports are anecdotal
  19. The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
  20. So you believe there's a conspiracy?
  21. “There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
  22. (What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  23. Correlation does not equal causation
  24. ... (pretends nothing happened)