This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaLOLThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)This newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thing(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooMoreresearchisnecessary...(pretendsnothinghappened)Research hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)Correlationdoes notequalcausationTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mineTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?This researcherwas interviewedby atabloid/Russianmedia/right wingmediaLOLThese dozens ofstudies might totalthousands ofpatients, they'reindividually toosmallSo youbelievethere's aconspiracy?“There's noevidence that”(there's plenty ofit but also somenegativestudies)This newthing mightdrive peopleaway fromthat old thing(What I believeto be)extraordinaryclaims requireextraordinaryevidenceThisresearcherhas politicalopinionsSome similarresearch wasfraudulent and Iwon't run therisk of beingfooledSome similarresearch wasfraudulent sothis one istooMoreresearchisnecessary...(pretendsnothinghappened)Research hasshown it's untrue(shows researchthat has notshown it'suntrue)Correlationdoes notequalcausationTheuneducatedmasses believethis so it mustbe wrongMeta-analyses canbe biased,except mineTrust thescience!(No, notthis one)Thisresearcher ismentioned innaturalhealth blogsThis researchermight be one ofthe most quoted ofhis/her field,(s)he's stillmarginalThesethousands ofreports areanecdotalThe researchermight be one ofthe mostexperienced ofhis/her field, but(s)he clearly isgetting senileIf I exclude 90%of the trialsbased on myown criteria, theevidence isinsufficientEroding thetrust ininstitutionsmight causecountlessdeathsWhere isthe 2billiondollar trial?

FACT CHECKER'S - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. This researcher was interviewed by a tabloid/Russian media/right wing media
  2. LOL
  3. These dozens of studies might total thousands of patients, they're individually too small
  4. So you believe there's a conspiracy?
  5. “There's no evidence that” (there's plenty of it but also some negative studies)
  6. This new thing might drive people away from that old thing
  7. (What I believe to be) extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  8. This researcher has political opinions
  9. Some similar research was fraudulent and I won't run the risk of being fooled
  10. Some similar research was fraudulent so this one is too
  11. More research is necessary
  12. ... (pretends nothing happened)
  13. Research has shown it's untrue (shows research that has not shown it's untrue)
  14. Correlation does not equal causation
  15. The uneducated masses believe this so it must be wrong
  16. Meta-analyses can be biased, except mine
  17. Trust the science! (No, not this one)
  18. This researcher is mentioned in natural health blogs
  19. This researcher might be one of the most quoted of his/her field, (s)he's still marginal
  20. These thousands of reports are anecdotal
  21. The researcher might be one of the most experienced of his/her field, but (s)he clearly is getting senile
  22. If I exclude 90% of the trials based on my own criteria, the evidence is insufficient
  23. Eroding the trust in institutions might cause countless deaths
  24. Where is the 2 billion dollar trial?