Arguing that a majority is always right Hasty Generalization Correlation does not equal causation. A flawed person can still be right. You're changing the subject. Mob rule is not justice. Using emotion rather than facts A remote possibility is not a certainty. Being well- known doesn't make you an expert. Appeal to authority Ad populum Using a ridiculous example Changing the subject Post hoc Slippery slope Red herring Straw man False dilemma Presenting only two extreme choices Attacking a person instead of their argument False cause and effect Ad hominem All groups have all kinds of people. Appeal to emotion There are more than just two extemes. Making an assumption about a group Emotions are not facts. False chain of events That is an unrealistic extreme. Using a well- known figure Arguing that a majority is always right Hasty Generalization Correlation does not equal causation. A flawed person can still be right. You're changing the subject. Mob rule is not justice. Using emotion rather than facts A remote possibility is not a certainty. Being well- known doesn't make you an expert. Appeal to authority Ad populum Using a ridiculous example Changing the subject Post hoc Slippery slope Red herring Straw man False dilemma Presenting only two extreme choices Attacking a person instead of their argument False cause and effect Ad hominem All groups have all kinds of people. Appeal to emotion There are more than just two extemes. Making an assumption about a group Emotions are not facts. False chain of events That is an unrealistic extreme. Using a well- known figure
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
Arguing that a majority is always right
Hasty Generalization
Correlation does not equal causation.
A flawed person can still be right.
You're changing the subject.
Mob rule is not justice.
Using emotion rather than facts
A remote possibility is not a certainty.
Being well-known doesn't make you an expert.
Appeal to authority
Ad populum
Using a ridiculous example
Changing the subject
Post hoc
Slippery slope
Red herring
Straw man
False dilemma
Presenting only two extreme choices
Attacking a person instead of their argument
False cause and effect
Ad hominem
All groups have all kinds of people.
Appeal to emotion
There are more than just two extemes.
Making an assumption about a group
Emotions are not facts.
False chain of events
That is an unrealistic extreme.
Using a well-known figure