ObstetricianAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.In a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.TrueAlmost6,000Prophylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.SelvaggiReductionin costsassociatedPilonidalCystsDunnKirsnerPlasticsNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.Witt-MajchrzekO’LearyPICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.No statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesFalseOrthopedicsStrugala50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30-75 to-125mmHgIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.Birke-SorensenObstetricianAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.In a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.TrueAlmost6,000Prophylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.SelvaggiReductionin costsassociatedPilonidalCystsDunnKirsnerPlasticsNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.Witt-MajchrzekO’LearyPICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.No statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesFalseOrthopedicsStrugala50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30-75 to-125mmHgIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.Birke-Sorensen

NPWT Evidence Review - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Obstetrician
  2. An RCT found that patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasties saw a 76% reduction in superficial surgical site complications.
  3. In a study comparing PICO and conventional dressings for closed sternotomy wounds, the PICO group had significantly lower complications and superficial infections.
  4. True
  5. Almost 6,000
  6. Prophylactic use of PICO significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing groin surgery.
  7. Selvaggi
  8. Reduction in costs associated
  9. Pilonidal Cysts
  10. Dunn
  11. Kirsner
  12. Plastics
  13. No single treatment variable has been clinically proven to be more effective than another.
  14. Witt-Majchrzek
  15. O’Leary
  16. PICO demonstrated superior wound closure rates of lower extremity wounds, combined, over 12 weeks compared to tNPWT.
  17. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes
  18. False
  19. Orthopedics
  20. Strugala
  21. 50% reduction in surgical site infections for c-section patients with PICO compared to standard dressing when BMI >= 30
  22. -75 to -125 mmHg
  23. In a study of 1,107 patients treated with RENASYS or VAC, findings suggest there were no clinically meaningful differences in performances.
  24. Birke-Sorensen