PICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.PilonidalCystsSelvaggiPlasticsBirke-SorensenO’LearyAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.Almost6,000StrugalaTrueReductionin costsassociatedDunnIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.ObstetricianNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.-75 to-125mmHgProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.Orthopedics50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30FalseNo statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesKirsnerWitt-MajchrzekIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.PICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.PilonidalCystsSelvaggiPlasticsBirke-SorensenO’LearyAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.Almost6,000StrugalaTrueReductionin costsassociatedDunnIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.ObstetricianNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.-75 to-125mmHgProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.Orthopedics50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30FalseNo statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesKirsnerWitt-MajchrzekIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.

NPWT Evidence Review - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. PICO demonstrated superior wound closure rates of lower extremity wounds, combined, over 12 weeks compared to tNPWT.
  2. Pilonidal Cysts
  3. Selvaggi
  4. Plastics
  5. Birke-Sorensen
  6. O’Leary
  7. An RCT found that patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasties saw a 76% reduction in superficial surgical site complications.
  8. Almost 6,000
  9. Strugala
  10. True
  11. Reduction in costs associated
  12. Dunn
  13. In a study comparing PICO and conventional dressings for closed sternotomy wounds, the PICO group had significantly lower complications and superficial infections.
  14. Obstetrician
  15. No single treatment variable has been clinically proven to be more effective than another.
  16. -75 to -125 mmHg
  17. Prophylactic use of PICO significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing groin surgery.
  18. Orthopedics
  19. 50% reduction in surgical site infections for c-section patients with PICO compared to standard dressing when BMI >= 30
  20. False
  21. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes
  22. Kirsner
  23. Witt-Majchrzek
  24. In a study of 1,107 patients treated with RENASYS or VAC, findings suggest there were no clinically meaningful differences in performances.