No statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesObstetricianPICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.No singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.PilonidalCysts50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30Birke-SorensenProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.An RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.FalseKirsnerIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.-75 to-125mmHgAlmost6,000SelvaggiReductionin costsassociatedIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.TrueWitt-MajchrzekPlasticsDunnStrugalaO’LearyOrthopedicsNo statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesObstetricianPICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.No singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.PilonidalCysts50% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30Birke-SorensenProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.An RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.FalseKirsnerIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.-75 to-125mmHgAlmost6,000SelvaggiReductionin costsassociatedIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.TrueWitt-MajchrzekPlasticsDunnStrugalaO’LearyOrthopedics

NPWT Evidence Review - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes
  2. Obstetrician
  3. PICO demonstrated superior wound closure rates of lower extremity wounds, combined, over 12 weeks compared to tNPWT.
  4. No single treatment variable has been clinically proven to be more effective than another.
  5. Pilonidal Cysts
  6. 50% reduction in surgical site infections for c-section patients with PICO compared to standard dressing when BMI >= 30
  7. Birke-Sorensen
  8. Prophylactic use of PICO significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing groin surgery.
  9. An RCT found that patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasties saw a 76% reduction in superficial surgical site complications.
  10. False
  11. Kirsner
  12. In a study comparing PICO and conventional dressings for closed sternotomy wounds, the PICO group had significantly lower complications and superficial infections.
  13. -75 to -125 mmHg
  14. Almost 6,000
  15. Selvaggi
  16. Reduction in costs associated
  17. In a study of 1,107 patients treated with RENASYS or VAC, findings suggest there were no clinically meaningful differences in performances.
  18. True
  19. Witt-Majchrzek
  20. Plastics
  21. Dunn
  22. Strugala
  23. O’Leary
  24. Orthopedics