-75 to-125mmHgIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.PICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.FalseObstetricianAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.DunnIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.Birke-SorensenPilonidalCystsAlmost6,00050% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30Reductionin costsassociatedO’LearyStrugalaKirsnerNo statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.SelvaggiNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.TrueWitt-MajchrzekPlasticsOrthopedics-75 to-125mmHgIn a study comparingPICO and conventionaldressings for closedsternotomy wounds,the PICO group hadsignificantly lowercomplications andsuperficial infections.PICO demonstratedsuperior woundclosure rates of lowerextremity wounds,combined, over 12weeks compared totNPWT.FalseObstetricianAn RCT found thatpatients undergoingprimary hip and kneearthroplasties saw a76% reduction insuperficial surgicalsite complications.DunnIn a study of 1,107patients treated withRENASYS or VAC,findings suggestthere were noclinically meaningfuldifferences inperformances.Birke-SorensenPilonidalCystsAlmost6,00050% reduction insurgical siteinfections for c-section patients withPICO compared tostandard dressingwhen BMI >= 30Reductionin costsassociatedO’LearyStrugalaKirsnerNo statisticallysignificantdifferences inclinicaloutcomesProphylactic use ofPICO significantlyreduced theincidence of SSIs inpatients undergoinggroin surgery.SelvaggiNo singletreatment variablehas been clinicallyproven to be moreeffective thananother.TrueWitt-MajchrzekPlasticsOrthopedics

NPWT Evidence Review - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. -75 to -125 mmHg
  2. In a study comparing PICO and conventional dressings for closed sternotomy wounds, the PICO group had significantly lower complications and superficial infections.
  3. PICO demonstrated superior wound closure rates of lower extremity wounds, combined, over 12 weeks compared to tNPWT.
  4. False
  5. Obstetrician
  6. An RCT found that patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasties saw a 76% reduction in superficial surgical site complications.
  7. Dunn
  8. In a study of 1,107 patients treated with RENASYS or VAC, findings suggest there were no clinically meaningful differences in performances.
  9. Birke-Sorensen
  10. Pilonidal Cysts
  11. Almost 6,000
  12. 50% reduction in surgical site infections for c-section patients with PICO compared to standard dressing when BMI >= 30
  13. Reduction in costs associated
  14. O’Leary
  15. Strugala
  16. Kirsner
  17. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes
  18. Prophylactic use of PICO significantly reduced the incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing groin surgery.
  19. Selvaggi
  20. No single treatment variable has been clinically proven to be more effective than another.
  21. True
  22. Witt-Majchrzek
  23. Plastics
  24. Orthopedics