(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
B-Black or White (Where two alternative states are presented as the only possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist.)
G-The Texas Sharpshooter (Cherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument)
I-No True Scotsman (Making what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of an argument)
G-Anecdotal (Using personal experience or an isolated example instead of a valid argument)
G-False Cause (Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other.)
B-The Gambler’s Fallacy (Believing that ‘runs’ occur to statistically independent phenomena)
G-Personal Incredulity (Saying that because one finds something difficult to understand that it’s therefore not true.)
B-Tu Quoque (Avoiding having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser)
O-Loaded Question (Asking a question that has an assumption built into it so that it can’t be answered without appearing guilty.)
I-Strawman (Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.)
O-Special Pleading (Moving the goalposts to create exceptions when a claim is shown to be false.)
N-Burden of Proof (Saying that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.)
O-The Fallacy Fallacy (Presuming that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that it is necessarily wrong)
I-Composition/Division (Assuming that what’s true about one part of something has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it.)
O-Ad Hominem (Attacking your opponent’s character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.)
N-Appeal to Emotion (Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.)
N-Middle Ground (Saying that a compromise, or middle point, between two extremes is the truth.)
O-Appeal to Nature (Making the argument that because something is ‘natural’ it is therefore valid)
B-Appeal to Authority (Using the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument.)
N-Circular Logic (A circular argument in which the conclusion is included in the premise.)
I-Bandwagon (Appealing to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation)
G-Slippery Slope (Asserting that if we allow A to happen, then Z will consequently happen too, therefore A should not happen.)
I-Genetic (Judging something good or bad on the basis of where it comes from)
B-Ambiguity (Using double meanings or ambiguities of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.)
