SEMANTICMEMORYTYPE OF LTM THATINVOLVES THERECALL OFGENERAL WORLDKNOWLEDGE LIKEFACTS, IDEAS ANDPEOPLEBRANSFORDANDJOHNSONTESTED WHETHERSCHEMA ACTIVATIONWOULD INFLUENCERECALL ANDCOMPREHENSIONOF AN AMBIGUOSPASSAGEPETERSONANDPETERSONCONDUCTED A LABEXPERIMENT TOTEST DURTION OFSTM AND WHETHERREHEARSAL WASNEEDED FORRECALL OFTRIGRAMSSCHEMAAN ORGANISED MENTALFRAMEWORK STOREDIN LTM THAT CONTAINSEVERYTHING YOUKNOW ABOUT APERSON, PLACE,EVENTOR OBJECTDUALPROCESSINGMODELMODEL THATSUGGESTS THATWE HAVE TWOSYSTEMS OFTHINKING:SYSTEM 1 & 2EPISODICMEMORYTYPE OF LTM THATINVOLVES THERECALL OFSPECIFIC EVENTSFROM ONE'SPERSONAL PASTEPISODICBUFFERPART OF WMM THATIS RESPONSIBLEFOR INTEGRATINGINFORMATION FROMOTHERCOMPONENTS WITHTIME SEQUENCINGSYSTEM2THINKINGRATIONAL,CONCIOUS ANDSLOW FORM OFTHINKING THATREQUIRES MORECOGNITIVEEFFORTNEISSER&HARSCHSTUDIED FLASHBULBMEMORIES OF THECHALLENGER DISASTERAND FOUND THATALTHOUGHPARTICIPANTS WERECONFIDENT ABOUTTHEIR MEMORIES THEYWERE NOT ACCURATEHIPPOCAMPUSPART OF THETEMPORAL LOBEWHICH ISRESPONSIBLEFOR THETRANSFER OFSTM TO LTMFOUND THATSPINNING A WHEELOF FORTUNEWHEELINFLUENCEDESTIMATES OFUNRELATEDQUESTIONSTVERKSYANDKAHNEMANANCHORINGBIASTENDENCY TORELY TOOHEAVILY ONFIRST PIECE OFINFORMATIONENCOUNTEREDSHORTTERMMEMORYPART OF MSMTHAT IS SAID TOHAVE ACAPACITY FOR7+-2 UNITS OFINFORMATIONEPISODICBUFFERCOMPONENT OFWMM BINDS ANDINTEGRATESINFORMATIONFROM ALL OTHERCOMPONENTSTOGETHER WITHTIME SEQUECINGFLASHBULBMEMORYA HIGHLY DETAILEDAND VIVIDMEMORY OF THEMOMENT APERSON LEARNEDABOUT ASHOCKING EVENTALTER ANDOPPENHEIMERINVESTIGATEDWHETHER TESTFLUENCY WOULDIMPACTPERFORMANCE ONCOGNITIVEREASONING TESTENGLICH &MUSSWEILERINVESTIGATEDWHETHERANCHORING BIASWOULD IMPACTRECOMMENDEDSENTENCE LENGTHIN GERMAN TRIALJUDGESSYSTEM1AN AUTOMATICAND INTUITIVEWAY OF THINKINGTHAT DOES NOTPLACE HIGHDEMANDS ONWORKINGMEMORYYUILLE &CUTSHALLFOUND THATLEADINGQUESTIONS DIDNOT INFLUENCERECALL OFEYEWITNESSES OFA REAL ROBBERYIN CANADAMULTISTOREMODELONE OF EARLIESTMODELS TOPROVIDE A BASICOVERVIEW OFMEMORY WHICH ISNOW CRITICISEDFOR BEING TOOSIMPLISTICLOFTUSANDPALMERINVESTIGATEDWHETHER LEADINGQUESTIONS WOULDINFLUENCEACCURACY OFRECALL OF A CARACCIDENTPSYCHOLOGISTWHOPROPOSED THEDUALPROCESSINGMODELKAHNEMANBARTLETTCONDUCTEDTHE WAR OFTHEGHOSTSSTUDYMISINFORMATIONEFFECTREFERS TO WHENPOST EVENINFORMATIONINFLUENCES THEACCURACY OFRECALL OF ANEVENTPROCEDURALMEMORYTYPE OF LTMWHICH INVOLVESTHE RECALL OFHOW TO PERFORMPARTICULARACTIONS ANDSKILLSSHAROTET ALCONDUCTED A QUASIEXPERIMENT WITHPARTICIPANTS IN NEWYORK ON 9/11 TOINVESTIGATE THE ROLEOF THE AMYGDALA INTHE RETRIEVAL OFFLASHBULB MEMORIESGILEADET ALUSED FMRI SCANNERSTO SEE WHETHERDIFFERENT AREAS OFTHE BRAIN WEREACTIVE WHENANSWERING CONCRETEOR ABSTRACTQUESTIONSPHONOLOGICALLOOPPART OF WMMRESPONSIBILEFORPROCESSINGAUDITORYINFORMATIONAND LANGUAGESEMANTICMEMORYTYPE OF LTM THATINVOLVES THERECALL OFGENERAL WORLDKNOWLEDGE LIKEFACTS, IDEAS ANDPEOPLEBRANSFORDANDJOHNSONTESTED WHETHERSCHEMA ACTIVATIONWOULD INFLUENCERECALL ANDCOMPREHENSIONOF AN AMBIGUOSPASSAGEPETERSONANDPETERSONCONDUCTED A LABEXPERIMENT TOTEST DURTION OFSTM AND WHETHERREHEARSAL WASNEEDED FORRECALL OFTRIGRAMSSCHEMAAN ORGANISED MENTALFRAMEWORK STOREDIN LTM THAT CONTAINSEVERYTHING YOUKNOW ABOUT APERSON, PLACE,EVENTOR OBJECTDUALPROCESSINGMODELMODEL THATSUGGESTS THATWE HAVE TWOSYSTEMS OFTHINKING:SYSTEM 1 & 2EPISODICMEMORYTYPE OF LTM THATINVOLVES THERECALL OFSPECIFIC EVENTSFROM ONE'SPERSONAL PASTEPISODICBUFFERPART OF WMM THATIS RESPONSIBLEFOR INTEGRATINGINFORMATION FROMOTHERCOMPONENTS WITHTIME SEQUENCINGSYSTEM2THINKINGRATIONAL,CONCIOUS ANDSLOW FORM OFTHINKING THATREQUIRES MORECOGNITIVEEFFORTNEISSER&HARSCHSTUDIED FLASHBULBMEMORIES OF THECHALLENGER DISASTERAND FOUND THATALTHOUGHPARTICIPANTS WERECONFIDENT ABOUTTHEIR MEMORIES THEYWERE NOT ACCURATEHIPPOCAMPUSPART OF THETEMPORAL LOBEWHICH ISRESPONSIBLEFOR THETRANSFER OFSTM TO LTMFOUND THATSPINNING A WHEELOF FORTUNEWHEELINFLUENCEDESTIMATES OFUNRELATEDQUESTIONSTVERKSYANDKAHNEMANANCHORINGBIASTENDENCY TORELY TOOHEAVILY ONFIRST PIECE OFINFORMATIONENCOUNTEREDSHORTTERMMEMORYPART OF MSMTHAT IS SAID TOHAVE ACAPACITY FOR7+-2 UNITS OFINFORMATIONEPISODICBUFFERCOMPONENT OFWMM BINDS ANDINTEGRATESINFORMATIONFROM ALL OTHERCOMPONENTSTOGETHER WITHTIME SEQUECINGFLASHBULBMEMORYA HIGHLY DETAILEDAND VIVIDMEMORY OF THEMOMENT APERSON LEARNEDABOUT ASHOCKING EVENTALTER ANDOPPENHEIMERINVESTIGATEDWHETHER TESTFLUENCY WOULDIMPACTPERFORMANCE ONCOGNITIVEREASONING TESTENGLICH &MUSSWEILERINVESTIGATEDWHETHERANCHORING BIASWOULD IMPACTRECOMMENDEDSENTENCE LENGTHIN GERMAN TRIALJUDGESSYSTEM1AN AUTOMATICAND INTUITIVEWAY OF THINKINGTHAT DOES NOTPLACE HIGHDEMANDS ONWORKINGMEMORYYUILLE &CUTSHALLFOUND THATLEADINGQUESTIONS DIDNOT INFLUENCERECALL OFEYEWITNESSES OFA REAL ROBBERYIN CANADAMULTISTOREMODELONE OF EARLIESTMODELS TOPROVIDE A BASICOVERVIEW OFMEMORY WHICH ISNOW CRITICISEDFOR BEING TOOSIMPLISTICLOFTUSANDPALMERINVESTIGATEDWHETHER LEADINGQUESTIONS WOULDINFLUENCEACCURACY OFRECALL OF A CARACCIDENTPSYCHOLOGISTWHOPROPOSED THEDUALPROCESSINGMODELKAHNEMANBARTLETTCONDUCTEDTHE WAR OFTHEGHOSTSSTUDYMISINFORMATIONEFFECTREFERS TO WHENPOST EVENINFORMATIONINFLUENCES THEACCURACY OFRECALL OF ANEVENTPROCEDURALMEMORYTYPE OF LTMWHICH INVOLVESTHE RECALL OFHOW TO PERFORMPARTICULARACTIONS ANDSKILLSSHAROTET ALCONDUCTED A QUASIEXPERIMENT WITHPARTICIPANTS IN NEWYORK ON 9/11 TOINVESTIGATE THE ROLEOF THE AMYGDALA INTHE RETRIEVAL OFFLASHBULB MEMORIESGILEADET ALUSED FMRI SCANNERSTO SEE WHETHERDIFFERENT AREAS OFTHE BRAIN WEREACTIVE WHENANSWERING CONCRETEOR ABSTRACTQUESTIONSPHONOLOGICALLOOPPART OF WMMRESPONSIBILEFORPROCESSINGAUDITORYINFORMATIONAND LANGUAGE

2022 COGNITIVE APPROACH - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
  1. TYPE OF LTM THAT INVOLVES THE RECALL OF GENERAL WORLD KNOWLEDGE LIKE FACTS, IDEAS AND PEOPLE
    SEMANTIC MEMORY
  2. TESTED WHETHER SCHEMA ACTIVATION WOULD INFLUENCE RECALL AND COMPREHENSION OF AN AMBIGUOS PASSAGE
    BRANSFORD AND JOHNSON
  3. CONDUCTED A LAB EXPERIMENT TO TEST DURTION OF STM AND WHETHER REHEARSAL WAS NEEDED FOR RECALL OF TRIGRAMS
    PETERSON AND PETERSON
  4. AN ORGANISED MENTAL FRAMEWORK STORED IN LTM THAT CONTAINS EVERYTHING YOU KNOW ABOUT A PERSON, PLACE,EVENT OR OBJECT
    SCHEMA
  5. MODEL THAT SUGGESTS THAT WE HAVE TWO SYSTEMS OF THINKING: SYSTEM 1 & 2
    DUAL PROCESSING MODEL
  6. TYPE OF LTM THAT INVOLVES THE RECALL OF SPECIFIC EVENTS FROM ONE'S PERSONAL PAST
    EPISODIC MEMORY
  7. PART OF WMM THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTEGRATING INFORMATION FROM OTHER COMPONENTS WITH TIME SEQUENCING
    EPISODIC BUFFER
  8. RATIONAL, CONCIOUS AND SLOW FORM OF THINKING THAT REQUIRES MORE COGNITIVE EFFORT
    SYSTEM 2 THINKING
  9. STUDIED FLASHBULB MEMORIES OF THE CHALLENGER DISASTER AND FOUND THAT ALTHOUGH PARTICIPANTS WERE CONFIDENT ABOUT THEIR MEMORIES THEY WERE NOT ACCURATE
    NEISSER & HARSCH
  10. PART OF THE TEMPORAL LOBE WHICH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TRANSFER OF STM TO LTM
    HIPPOCAMPUS
  11. TVERKSY AND KAHNEMAN
    FOUND THAT SPINNING A WHEEL OF FORTUNE WHEEL INFLUENCED ESTIMATES OF UNRELATED QUESTIONS
  12. TENDENCY TO RELY TOO HEAVILY ON FIRST PIECE OF INFORMATION ENCOUNTERED
    ANCHORING BIAS
  13. PART OF MSM THAT IS SAID TO HAVE A CAPACITY FOR 7+-2 UNITS OF INFORMATION
    SHORT TERM MEMORY
  14. COMPONENT OF WMM BINDS AND INTEGRATES INFORMATION FROM ALL OTHER COMPONENTS TOGETHER WITH TIME SEQUECING
    EPISODIC BUFFER
  15. A HIGHLY DETAILED AND VIVID MEMORY OF THE MOMENT A PERSON LEARNED ABOUT A SHOCKING EVENT
    FLASHBULB MEMORY
  16. INVESTIGATED WHETHER TEST FLUENCY WOULD IMPACT PERFORMANCE ON COGNITIVE REASONING TEST
    ALTER AND OPPENHEIMER
  17. INVESTIGATED WHETHER ANCHORING BIAS WOULD IMPACT RECOMMENDED SENTENCE LENGTH IN GERMAN TRIAL JUDGES
    ENGLICH & MUSSWEILER
  18. AN AUTOMATIC AND INTUITIVE WAY OF THINKING THAT DOES NOT PLACE HIGH DEMANDS ON WORKING MEMORY
    SYSTEM 1
  19. FOUND THAT LEADING QUESTIONS DID NOT INFLUENCE RECALL OF EYEWITNESSES OF A REAL ROBBERY IN CANADA
    YUILLE & CUTSHALL
  20. ONE OF EARLIEST MODELS TO PROVIDE A BASIC OVERVIEW OF MEMORY WHICH IS NOW CRITICISED FOR BEING TOO SIMPLISTIC
    MULTI STORE MODEL
  21. INVESTIGATED WHETHER LEADING QUESTIONS WOULD INFLUENCE ACCURACY OF RECALL OF A CAR ACCIDENT
    LOFTUS AND PALMER
  22. KAHNEMAN
    PSYCHOLOGIST WHO PROPOSED THE DUAL PROCESSING MODEL
  23. CONDUCTED THE WAR OF THE GHOSTS STUDY
    BARTLETT
  24. REFERS TO WHEN POST EVEN INFORMATION INFLUENCES THE ACCURACY OF RECALL OF AN EVENT
    MISINFORMATION EFFECT
  25. TYPE OF LTM WHICH INVOLVES THE RECALL OF HOW TO PERFORM PARTICULAR ACTIONS AND SKILLS
    PROCEDURAL MEMORY
  26. CONDUCTED A QUASI EXPERIMENT WITH PARTICIPANTS IN NEW YORK ON 9/11 TO INVESTIGATE THE ROLE OF THE AMYGDALA IN THE RETRIEVAL OF FLASHBULB MEMORIES
    SHAROT ET AL
  27. USED FMRI SCANNERS TO SEE WHETHER DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE BRAIN WERE ACTIVE WHEN ANSWERING CONCRETE OR ABSTRACT QUESTIONS
    GILEAD ET AL
  28. PART OF WMM RESPONSIBILE FOR PROCESSING AUDITORY INFORMATION AND LANGUAGE
    PHONOLOGICAL LOOP