(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
"Mix of human and ape bones"
"The evidence is all the same, it's just your worldview that influences how you interpret it differently"
Kinds
Homology isn't real, it's just a common design (God is uncreative and copy pasted everything)
Geological features that weren't deposited by a flood used as evidence for Noah's flood (e.g. Grand Canyon)
Uses the argument that if you don't take the whole Bible literally you can't take any of it literally
Studied a field completely unrelated to what they're speaking about (e.g. an engineer talking about genetics)
"You think we came from a rock"
Explains how you'd need billions of years for a mutation to substitute then tells you that 1600 kinds gave rise to all species within a few hundred years
Mischaracterisation of someone/something that clearly does not support them
"Kids are being indoctrinated"
Uses probability to calculate the likelihood of us as a species existing without taking into account that we already exist
Second law of thermodynamics somehow disproves abiogenesis
Gets confused when science isn't the same as what they learned when they were in primary school
Citing Bible verses as evidence rather than as claims
False dichotomy, "Either you're a creationist or you're an atheist"
Vestigial organs aren't vestigial if they serve some kind of new purpose
Soft tissue in Tyrannosaurus femur
Claims the Bible made predictions when in reality science made predictions and they had to change their work to fit them
Calls evolutionary theory a religion (bonus if they cite Darwin as a prophet!!)
Off by several orders of magnitude/can't do highschool math (either applies)
Confuses evolution and abiogenesis
Uses the fact that scientists haven't been able to entirely replicate abiogenesis to somehow say it didn't happen