(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
"okay, but authors would never abuse it to create an unequal situation by using varying levels of aggressive tactics to coerce feedback"
"the rating system behaves differently from a binary rating system mathematically"
Free!
"having a low average rating means readers dismiss my novel then they go do something else other than reading"
"okay, but having less negative ratings would make it so users give more stories a chance"
"giving readers reading suggestions irrespective of other readers opinions does not result in a worse experience"
“reminding readers to rate or review would lead to an objectively better rating system"
"a 0.5 star rating is never justifiable"
"okay, but RR doesn't actually try to provide lists not based on ratings"
"negative feedback is inherently bad"
"removing ratings completely is beneficial to authors"
"we need more five star ratings"
"it's RR's fault that getting traction as a new author is hard"
"there is only bias when talking about 0.5 star ratings"
"you can evaluate subjective quality/suitability based only on positive feedback"
"it is a bad thing that higher ranked fictions get more views"
"ratings under 4 stars mean death because that's what the users decided to draw the line at"
"okay, but there is only bias when talking about ratings less than 3 stars"
"the number of chapters read is linearly proportional with how well-formed a readers opinion is"
"what do you mean readers would just raise the bar? That's absolutely not how it works, that's how why users draw the line at the neutral unbiased mean of 2.75 stars"
"you can give ideal personalised suggestions without ratings"
"ratings affect visibility on all lists"
"okay, but you can objectively evaluate it based on the percentage of readers willing to give positive feedback"
"you can give ideal personalised suggestions"
"everyone having less negative ratings would improve everyone's rankings"
"removing ratings completely is beneficial to readers"
