(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
"having a low average rating means readers dismiss my novel then they go do something else other than reading"
"what do you mean readers would just raise the bar? That's absolutely not how it works, that's how why users draw the line at the neutral unbiased mean of 2.75 stars"
“reminding readers to rate or review would lead to an objectively better rating system"
"okay, but RR doesn't actually try to provide lists not based on ratings"
"okay, but having less negative ratings would make it so users give more stories a chance"
"ratings under 4 stars mean death because that's what the users decided to draw the line at"
"you can give ideal personalised suggestions"
"it is a bad thing that higher ranked fictions get more views"
"okay, but there is only bias when talking about ratings less than 3 stars"
"it's RR's fault that getting traction as a new author is hard"
"we need more five star ratings"
"ratings affect visibility on all lists"
Free!
"you can give ideal personalised suggestions without ratings"
"the rating system behaves differently from a binary rating system mathematically"
"you can evaluate subjective quality/suitability based only on positive feedback"
"everyone having less negative ratings would improve everyone's rankings"
"giving readers reading suggestions irrespective of other readers opinions does not result in a worse experience"
"removing ratings completely is beneficial to authors"
"removing ratings completely is beneficial to readers"
"a 0.5 star rating is never justifiable"
"okay, but you can objectively evaluate it based on the percentage of readers willing to give positive feedback"
"the number of chapters read is linearly proportional with how well-formed a readers opinion is"
"negative feedback is inherently bad"
"there is only bias when talking about 0.5 star ratings"
"okay, but authors would never abuse it to create an unequal situation by using varying levels of aggressive tactics to coerce feedback"
