• no evidenceabout theimprovementofcommunicationpassionateargument• gives anexample ofan activityoutside of theclassroom• does not givethe title of therole ineducation orthe villageschool• muchopinion• notmuchevidenceanecdotalevidence• refers tolocaldoctor asevidence• usesexpertviews• littleauthority• usesrhetoricalquestions• statesthe viewat thebeginningexaggerated• refers toscientificmagazinesand teachersemotionalaspect atthe end• poorknowledgeclaimsstronglyworded• noreferencesor citation• no factsquoted aboutthemagazines,etc.• arantFree!• looks atthe globalpicture• gives anexampletoillustrate• little ifanyfactualevidence• usesWHO asevidenceemotional• no evidenceabout theimprovementofcommunicationpassionateargument• gives anexample ofan activityoutside of theclassroom• does not givethe title of therole ineducation orthe villageschool• muchopinion• notmuchevidenceanecdotalevidence• refers tolocaldoctor asevidence• usesexpertviews• littleauthority• usesrhetoricalquestions• statesthe viewat thebeginningexaggerated• refers toscientificmagazinesand teachersemotionalaspect atthe end• poorknowledgeclaimsstronglyworded• noreferencesor citation• no factsquoted aboutthemagazines,etc.• arantFree!• looks atthe globalpicture• gives anexampletoillustrate• little ifanyfactualevidence• usesWHO asevidenceemotional

Strengths and Weaknesses - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
  1. • no evidence about the improvement of communication
  2. • passionate argument
  3. • gives an example of an activity outside of the classroom
  4. • does not give the title of the role in education or the village school
  5. • much opinion
  6. • not much evidence
  7. • anecdotal evidence
  8. • refers to local doctor as evidence
  9. • uses expert views
  10. • little authority
  11. • uses rhetorical questions
  12. • states the view at the beginning
  13. • exaggerated
  14. • refers to scientific magazines and teachers
  15. • emotional aspect at the end
  16. • poor knowledge claims
  17. • strongly worded
  18. • no references or citation
  19. • no facts quoted about the magazines, etc.
  20. • a rant
  21. Free!
  22. • looks at the global picture
  23. • gives an example to illustrate
  24. • little if any factual evidence
  25. • uses WHO as evidence
  26. • emotional