(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
29-Drive-by ratings only affect my fiction and therefore it's an unequal contest
21-Negative feedback is inherently bad
2-The number of chapters read is linearly proportional with how well-formed a readers opinion is
13-Having a low average rating means readers dismiss my novel then they go do something else other than reading
28-Removing some top percentile of ratings totally makes sense"
27-What do you mean readers would just raise the bar? That's absolutely not how it works, that's why users draw the line at the neutral unbiased mean of 2.75 stars
26-okay, but having less negative ratings would make it so users give more stories a chance
14-Giving readers reading suggestions irrespective of other readers opinions does not result in a worse experience
7-We need more five star ratings
20-okay, but there is only bias when talking about ratings less than 3 stars
24-okay, but authors would never abuse it to create an unequal situation by using varying levels of aggressive tactics to coerce feedback
12-It is a bad thing that higher ranked fictions get more views
25-Everyone having less negative ratings would improve everyone's rankings"
22-You can evaluate subjective quality/suitability based only on positive feedback
23-okay, but you can objectively evaluate it based on the percentage of readers willing to give positive feedback
30-Using median instead of mean in a system with a bias factor of 20x makes perfect sense
16-Ratings affect visibility on all lists
19-There is only bias when talking about 0.5 star ratings
5-Reminding readers to rate or review would lead to an objectively better rating system
11-You can give ideal personalised suggestions
8-Removing ratings completely is beneficial to authors
1-Ratings under 4 stars mean death because that's what the users decided to draw the line at
18-A 0.5 star rating is never justifiable
4-okay, but once it's implemented, it'd be a fool-proof way to prevent drive-by ratings. Users would absolutely not do their best to bypass it
3-okay, but it'd be trivial to weigh ratings based on at least the first 10 chapter reads
10-You can give ideal personalised suggestions without ratings
9-Removing ratings completely is beneficial to readers
15-It's RR's fault that getting traction as a new author is hard
6-The rating system behaves differently from a binary rating system mathematically
17-Okay, but RR doesn't actually try to provide lists not based on ratings
