(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
14-Giving readers reading suggestions irrespective of other readers opinions does not result in a worse experience
29-Drive-by ratings only affect my fiction and therefore it's an unequal contest
26-okay, but having less negative ratings would make it so users give more stories a chance
6-The rating system behaves differently from a binary rating system mathematically
9-Removing ratings completely is beneficial to readers
21-Negative feedback is inherently bad
23-okay, but you can objectively evaluate it based on the percentage of readers willing to give positive feedback
13-Having a low average rating means readers dismiss my novel then they go do something else other than reading
27-What do you mean readers would just raise the bar? That's absolutely not how it works, that's why users draw the line at the neutral unbiased mean of 2.75 stars
25-Everyone having less negative ratings would improve everyone's rankings"
15-It's RR's fault that getting traction as a new author is hard
7-We need more five star ratings
12-It is a bad thing that higher ranked fictions get more views
28-Removing some top percentile of ratings totally makes sense"
8-Removing ratings completely is beneficial to authors
10-You can give ideal personalised suggestions without ratings
2-The number of chapters read is linearly proportional with how well-formed a readers opinion is
5-Reminding readers to rate or review would lead to an objectively better rating system
30-Using median instead of mean in a system with a bias factor of 20x makes perfect sense
1-Ratings under 4 stars mean death because that's what the users decided to draw the line at
4-okay, but once it's implemented, it'd be a fool-proof way to prevent drive-by ratings. Users would absolutely not do their best to bypass it
18-A 0.5 star rating is never justifiable
16-Ratings affect visibility on all lists
3-okay, but it'd be trivial to weigh ratings based on at least the first 10 chapter reads
20-okay, but there is only bias when talking about ratings less than 3 stars
11-You can give ideal personalised suggestions
22-You can evaluate subjective quality/suitability based only on positive feedback
19-There is only bias when talking about 0.5 star ratings
24-okay, but authors would never abuse it to create an unequal situation by using varying levels of aggressive tactics to coerce feedback
17-Okay, but RR doesn't actually try to provide lists not based on ratings
