open In-Group Homogeneity Bias positive Rumors self- efficacy Likely cooperation self- esteem rejection Double- Standard Thinking depersonalized assimilated fraternal deprivation optimal distinctiveness theory social movement group membership equal status stereotype threat Self- worth egoistic deprivation Out-Group Homogeneity Bias self Violence no passive exclusion sociometer tend-and- befriend response psychogenic illness verification True identification boundaries false Ultimate Attribution Error negative crowds output inclusion mobs fight-or- flight response Unlikely Yes superordinate individuals Deindividuation connected riots Social Categorization norms rumors relative deprivation goals input throughput dynamic equilibrium open In-Group Homogeneity Bias positive Rumors self- efficacy Likely cooperation self- esteem rejection Double- Standard Thinking depersonalized assimilated fraternal deprivation optimal distinctiveness theory social movement group membership equal status stereotype threat Self- worth egoistic deprivation Out-Group Homogeneity Bias self Violence no passive exclusion sociometer tend-and- befriend response psychogenic illness verification True identification boundaries false Ultimate Attribution Error negative crowds output inclusion mobs fight-or- flight response Unlikely Yes superordinate individuals Deindividuation connected riots Social Categorization norms rumors relative deprivation goals input throughput dynamic equilibrium
(Print)
open
In-Group Homogeneity Bias
positive
Rumors
self-efficacy
Likely
cooperation
self-esteem
rejection
Double-Standard Thinking
depersonalized
assimilated
fraternal deprivation
optimal distinctiveness theory
social movement
group membership
equal status
stereotype threat
Self-worth
egoistic deprivation
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
self
Violence
no
passive exclusion
sociometer
tend-and-befriend response
psychogenic illness
verification
True
identification
boundaries
false
Ultimate Attribution Error
negative
crowds
output
inclusion
mobs
fight-or-flight response
Unlikely
Yes
superordinate
individuals
Deindividuation
connected
riots
Social Categorization
norms
rumors
relative deprivation
goals
input
throughput
dynamic equilibrium
