(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
B-an argument is considered valid simply because it is made by a perceived authority figure, without providing sufficient evidence or reasoning.
G-Free!!
B-an argument is based on evoking pity or sympathy from the audience rather than providing relevant evidence or reasoning.
I-assuming a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or phenomena simply because they occur together in time or in close proximity.
N-an argument presents only two options or alternatives when, in reality, there are more possibilities or nuanced positions.
I-the conclusion of an argument is assumed within the premises of that same argument.
B-an argument is based on the absence of evidence or lack of knowledge, rather than on actual evidence or reasoning.
B-an argument is attacked by criticizing the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
N-a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient or limited evidence. It involves making a broad generalization about a whole group or population based on a small or unrepresentative sample.
N-involves diverting attention from the main issue or topic by introducing irrelevant information or arguments.
G-someone misrepresents or exaggerates an opponent's argument in order to make it easier to attack or refute.
N-assumes that because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause of the second event.
I-an argument draws a comparison between two things that are not sufficiently similar, leading to an invalid or misleading conclusion.
G-someone argues that a particular action or event will inevitably lead to a series of increasingly negative consequences.
I-an argument is deemed valid or true solely because many people believe or support it.
G-involves making an overly broad or universal statement about a group of people or things based on limited or insufficient evidence.