someonemisrepresents orexaggerates anopponent'sargument in orderto make it easierto attack or refute.assuming a cause-and-effectrelationship betweentwo events orphenomena simplybecause they occurtogether in time or inclose proximity.an argument is basedon evoking pity orsympathy from theaudience rather thanproviding relevantevidence orreasoning.assumes thatbecause oneevent followsanother, the firstevent must be thecause of thesecond event.involves divertingattention from themain issue or topicby introducingirrelevantinformation orarguments.someone argues thata particular action orevent will inevitablylead to a series ofincreasingly negativeconsequences.involves making anoverly broad oruniversal statementabout a group ofpeople or thingsbased on limited orinsufficient evidence.an argument isdeemed validor true solelybecause manypeople believeor support it.the conclusionof an argumentis assumedwithin thepremises of thatsame argument.Free!!a conclusion is drawnbased on insufficient orlimited evidence. Itinvolves making a broadgeneralization about awhole group orpopulation based on asmall or unrepresentativesample.an argumentpresents only twooptions oralternatives when,in reality, there aremore possibilities ornuanced positions.an argument isattacked bycriticizing theperson making theargument ratherthan addressing theargument itself.an argument isconsidered validsimply because it ismade by a perceivedauthority figure,without providingsufficient evidence orreasoning.an argument draws acomparison betweentwo things that arenot sufficientlysimilar, leading to aninvalid or misleadingconclusion.an argument is basedon the absence ofevidence or lack ofknowledge, ratherthan on actualevidence orreasoning.someonemisrepresents orexaggerates anopponent'sargument in orderto make it easierto attack or refute.assuming a cause-and-effectrelationship betweentwo events orphenomena simplybecause they occurtogether in time or inclose proximity.an argument is basedon evoking pity orsympathy from theaudience rather thanproviding relevantevidence orreasoning.assumes thatbecause oneevent followsanother, the firstevent must be thecause of thesecond event.involves divertingattention from themain issue or topicby introducingirrelevantinformation orarguments.someone argues thata particular action orevent will inevitablylead to a series ofincreasingly negativeconsequences.involves making anoverly broad oruniversal statementabout a group ofpeople or thingsbased on limited orinsufficient evidence.an argument isdeemed validor true solelybecause manypeople believeor support it.the conclusionof an argumentis assumedwithin thepremises of thatsame argument.Free!!a conclusion is drawnbased on insufficient orlimited evidence. Itinvolves making a broadgeneralization about awhole group orpopulation based on asmall or unrepresentativesample.an argumentpresents only twooptions oralternatives when,in reality, there aremore possibilities ornuanced positions.an argument isattacked bycriticizing theperson making theargument ratherthan addressing theargument itself.an argument isconsidered validsimply because it ismade by a perceivedauthority figure,without providingsufficient evidence orreasoning.an argument draws acomparison betweentwo things that arenot sufficientlysimilar, leading to aninvalid or misleadingconclusion.an argument is basedon the absence ofevidence or lack ofknowledge, ratherthan on actualevidence orreasoning.

Inaccuracies - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
G
2
I
3
B
4
N
5
N
6
G
7
G
8
I
9
I
10
G
11
N
12
N
13
B
14
B
15
I
16
B
  1. G-someone misrepresents or exaggerates an opponent's argument in order to make it easier to attack or refute.
  2. I-assuming a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or phenomena simply because they occur together in time or in close proximity.
  3. B-an argument is based on evoking pity or sympathy from the audience rather than providing relevant evidence or reasoning.
  4. N-assumes that because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause of the second event.
  5. N-involves diverting attention from the main issue or topic by introducing irrelevant information or arguments.
  6. G-someone argues that a particular action or event will inevitably lead to a series of increasingly negative consequences.
  7. G-involves making an overly broad or universal statement about a group of people or things based on limited or insufficient evidence.
  8. I-an argument is deemed valid or true solely because many people believe or support it.
  9. I-the conclusion of an argument is assumed within the premises of that same argument.
  10. G-Free!!
  11. N-a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient or limited evidence. It involves making a broad generalization about a whole group or population based on a small or unrepresentative sample.
  12. N-an argument presents only two options or alternatives when, in reality, there are more possibilities or nuanced positions.
  13. B-an argument is attacked by criticizing the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
  14. B-an argument is considered valid simply because it is made by a perceived authority figure, without providing sufficient evidence or reasoning.
  15. I-an argument draws a comparison between two things that are not sufficiently similar, leading to an invalid or misleading conclusion.
  16. B-an argument is based on the absence of evidence or lack of knowledge, rather than on actual evidence or reasoning.