<Type>would actdifferentlyin their place[Correlationas the onlyargument]Emotional, socan't be xxTx Smart, socan't be xxFxEmotional ormelancholic=Fi-dom/E4"I (don't)believe"as a pointThey're<PY>, sothey can't be<jungian/ennea>UnhealthyXXXX-It's just aloop/gripWon'texplain, butit's aLITERALBLUEPRINT[Obviouslyfake or freelyinterpretedlore]Angry andedgy, sosx4/6/8My feelings=Fi Their feelings=FeSi is aboutmemoryandtraditionDon'ttype byletters!Only theblindcan't seeAnycorrelationispossibleJung/NaranjoACTUALLYmeant that...[contradicttheir sources]They'rejust like<...>XXXX bc<tert>/<axis>[dom+auxare notexplained]EX areobjectiveIX aresubjective[A bunch ofcitations, noexplanation]Detached orimaginative=Ni-dom/E5They useXx often,so they'rea Xx-domExxx aresocialIxxx arereservedThey fit s-X[no eX-corearguments](or viceversa)<Type>would actdifferentlyin their place[Correlationas the onlyargument]Emotional, socan't be xxTx Smart, socan't be xxFxEmotional ormelancholic=Fi-dom/E4"I (don't)believe"as a pointThey're<PY>, sothey can't be<jungian/ennea>UnhealthyXXXX-It's just aloop/gripWon'texplain, butit's aLITERALBLUEPRINT[Obviouslyfake or freelyinterpretedlore]Angry andedgy, sosx4/6/8My feelings=Fi Their feelings=FeSi is aboutmemoryandtraditionDon'ttype byletters!Only theblindcan't seeAnycorrelationispossibleJung/NaranjoACTUALLYmeant that...[contradicttheir sources]They'rejust like<...>XXXX bc<tert>/<axis>[dom+auxare notexplained]EX areobjectiveIX aresubjective[A bunch ofcitations, noexplanation]Detached orimaginative=Ni-dom/E5They useXx often,so they'rea Xx-domExxx aresocialIxxx arereservedThey fit s-X[no eX-corearguments](or viceversa)

Bullshit argumentation - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. <Type> would act differently in their place
  2. [Correlation as the only argument]
  3. Emotional, so can't be xxTx Smart, so can't be xxFx
  4. Emotional or melancholic = Fi-dom/E4
  5. "I (don't) believe" as a point
  6. They're <PY>, so they can't be <jungian/ ennea>
  7. Unhealthy XXXX - It's just a loop/grip
  8. Won't explain, but it's a LITERAL BLUEPRINT
  9. [Obviously fake or freely interpreted lore]
  10. Angry and edgy, so sx4/6/8
  11. My feelings =Fi Their feelings =Fe
  12. Si is about memory and tradition
  13. Don't type by letters!
  14. Only the blind can't see
  15. Any correlation is possible
  16. Jung/Naranjo ACTUALLY meant that... [contradict their sources]
  17. They're just like <...>
  18. XXXX bc <tert>/<axis> [dom+aux are not explained]
  19. EX are objective IX are subjective
  20. [A bunch of citations, no explanation]
  21. Detached or imaginative = Ni-dom/E5
  22. They use Xx often, so they're a Xx-dom
  23. Exxx are social Ixxx are reserved
  24. They fit s-X [no eX-core arguments] (or vice versa)