hugequotes towastespacetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionwrongcitationformatinsanesourcesoverpage/wordcountnocitationsorsourcesunderpage/wordcountnoanalysisjustsummarythey'rereaching,yourhonourwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographyalmostwholly inpassivevoiceincomprehensiblegrammarnoindent/linebreaksstonedor drunkpapermostsentencesare run-onsunintelligibleargumentnoprimarysourceshugequotes towastespacetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionwrongcitationformatinsanesourcesoverpage/wordcountnocitationsorsourcesunderpage/wordcountnoanalysisjustsummarythey'rereaching,yourhonourwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposplagiarismintro hookthatmakes nosensepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnohistoriographyalmostwholly inpassivevoiceincomprehensiblegrammarnoindent/linebreaksstonedor drunkpapermostsentencesare run-onsunintelligibleargumentnoprimarysources

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. huge quotes to waste space
  2. trying to badly justify a political position
  3. wrong citation format
  4. insane sources
  5. over page/word count
  6. no citations or sources
  7. under page/word count
  8. no analysis just summary
  9. they're reaching, your honour
  10. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  11. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  12. riddled with typos
  13. plagiarism
  14. intro hook that makes no sense
  15. paper from other subject posing as history
  16. evidence doesn't support points
  17. no historiography
  18. almost wholly in passive voice
  19. incomprehensible grammar
  20. no indent/line breaks
  21. stoned or drunk paper
  22. most sentences are run-ons
  23. unintelligible argument
  24. no primary sources