noindent/linebreaksnohistoriographymostsentencesare run-onsincomprehensiblegrammarhugequotes towastespaceunintelligibleargumentnoanalysisjustsummarywaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectoverpage/wordcountpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorythey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosenseevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnocitationsorsourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwrongcitationformatunderpage/wordcountplagiarisminsanesourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesriddledwithtyposstonedor drunkpapernoindent/linebreaksnohistoriographymostsentencesare run-onsincomprehensiblegrammarhugequotes towastespaceunintelligibleargumentnoanalysisjustsummarywaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectoverpage/wordcountpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorythey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionintro hookthatmakes nosenseevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnocitationsorsourceswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwrongcitationformatunderpage/wordcountplagiarisminsanesourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesriddledwithtyposstonedor drunkpaper

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. no indent/line breaks
  2. no historiography
  3. most sentences are run-ons
  4. incomprehensible grammar
  5. huge quotes to waste space
  6. unintelligible argument
  7. no analysis just summary
  8. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  9. over page/word count
  10. paper from other subject posing as history
  11. they're reaching, your honour
  12. trying to badly justify a political position
  13. intro hook that makes no sense
  14. evidence doesn't support points
  15. no citations or sources
  16. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  17. wrong citation format
  18. under page/word count
  19. plagiarism
  20. insane sources
  21. almost wholly in passive voice
  22. no primary sources
  23. riddled with typos
  24. stoned or drunk paper