wrongcitationformatwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoiceunderpage/wordcountriddledwithtyposnoanalysisjustsummarynoindent/linebreakswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalincomprehensiblegrammarnoprimarysourcesstonedor drunkpaperhugequotes towastespaceoverpage/wordcountevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsthey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnohistoriographyinsanesourcesintro hookthatmakes nosensenocitationsorsourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistorywrongcitationformatwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoiceunderpage/wordcountriddledwithtyposnoanalysisjustsummarynoindent/linebreakswikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalincomprehensiblegrammarnoprimarysourcesstonedor drunkpaperhugequotes towastespaceoverpage/wordcountevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsthey'rereaching,yourhonourtrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnohistoriographyinsanesourcesintro hookthatmakes nosensenocitationsorsourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistory

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. wrong citation format
  2. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  3. plagiarism
  4. most sentences are run-ons
  5. unintelligible argument
  6. almost wholly in passive voice
  7. under page/word count
  8. riddled with typos
  9. no analysis just summary
  10. no indent/line breaks
  11. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  12. incomprehensible grammar
  13. no primary sources
  14. stoned or drunk paper
  15. huge quotes to waste space
  16. over page/word count
  17. evidence doesn't support points
  18. they're reaching, your honour
  19. trying to badly justify a political position
  20. no historiography
  21. insane sources
  22. intro hook that makes no sense
  23. no citations or sources
  24. paper from other subject posing as history