stonedor drunkpaperwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectintro hookthatmakes nosensewrongcitationformathugequotes towastespacepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsnohistoriographyinsanesourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonouroverpage/wordcountnoindent/linebreaksnocitationsorsourcesriddledwithtyposwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunderpage/wordcounttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionincomprehensiblegrammarevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsstonedor drunkpaperwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectintro hookthatmakes nosensewrongcitationformathugequotes towastespacepaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesnoanalysisjustsummaryplagiarismmostsentencesare run-onsnohistoriographyinsanesourcesthey'rereaching,yourhonouroverpage/wordcountnoindent/linebreaksnocitationsorsourcesriddledwithtyposwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunderpage/wordcounttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionincomprehensiblegrammarevidencedoesn'tsupportpoints

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. stoned or drunk paper
  2. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  3. intro hook that makes no sense
  4. wrong citation format
  5. huge quotes to waste space
  6. paper from other subject posing as history
  7. unintelligible argument
  8. almost wholly in passive voice
  9. no primary sources
  10. no analysis just summary
  11. plagiarism
  12. most sentences are run-ons
  13. no historiography
  14. insane sources
  15. they're reaching, your honour
  16. over page/word count
  17. no indent/line breaks
  18. no citations or sources
  19. riddled with typos
  20. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  21. under page/word count
  22. trying to badly justify a political position
  23. incomprehensible grammar
  24. evidence doesn't support points