wikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalincomprehensiblegrammarwrongcitationformatplagiarismevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsunintelligibleargumenttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreaksriddledwithtyposthey'rereaching,yourhonourmostsentencesare run-onsnoanalysisjustsummaryunderpage/wordcountwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourceshugequotes towastespacestonedor drunkpapernocitationsorsourcesoverpage/wordcountnohistoriographywikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalincomprehensiblegrammarwrongcitationformatplagiarismevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsunintelligibleargumenttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionalmostwholly inpassivevoicenoprimarysourcesnoindent/linebreaksriddledwithtyposthey'rereaching,yourhonourmostsentencesare run-onsnoanalysisjustsummaryunderpage/wordcountwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectpaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosenseinsanesourceshugequotes towastespacestonedor drunkpapernocitationsorsourcesoverpage/wordcountnohistoriography

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  2. incomprehensible grammar
  3. wrong citation format
  4. plagiarism
  5. evidence doesn't support points
  6. unintelligible argument
  7. trying to badly justify a political position
  8. almost wholly in passive voice
  9. no primary sources
  10. no indent/line breaks
  11. riddled with typos
  12. they're reaching, your honour
  13. most sentences are run-ons
  14. no analysis just summary
  15. under page/word count
  16. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  17. paper from other subject posing as history
  18. intro hook that makes no sense
  19. insane sources
  20. huge quotes to waste space
  21. stoned or drunk paper
  22. no citations or sources
  23. over page/word count
  24. no historiography