nocitationsorsourcesmostsentencesare run-onsstonedor drunkpaperplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformatnohistoriographyoverpage/wordcountnoprimarysourcesinsanesourcesunderpage/wordcounthugequotes towastespacenoanalysisjustsummaryunintelligibleargumentnoindent/linebreakspaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposthey'rereaching,yourhonouralmostwholly inpassivevoicetrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsorsourcesmostsentencesare run-onsstonedor drunkpaperplagiarismwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalevidencedoesn'tsupportpointswrongcitationformatnohistoriographyoverpage/wordcountnoprimarysourcesinsanesourcesunderpage/wordcounthugequotes towastespacenoanalysisjustsummaryunintelligibleargumentnoindent/linebreakspaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposthey'rereaching,yourhonouralmostwholly inpassivevoicetrying tobadly justifya politicalposition

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. no citations or sources
  2. most sentences are run-ons
  3. stoned or drunk paper
  4. plagiarism
  5. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  6. evidence doesn't support points
  7. wrong citation format
  8. no historiography
  9. over page/word count
  10. no primary sources
  11. insane sources
  12. under page/word count
  13. huge quotes to waste space
  14. no analysis just summary
  15. unintelligible argument
  16. no indent/line breaks
  17. paper from other subject posing as history
  18. intro hook that makes no sense
  19. incomprehensible grammar
  20. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  21. riddled with typos
  22. they're reaching, your honour
  23. almost wholly in passive voice
  24. trying to badly justify a political position