nohistoriographyevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespaceintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarnoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsorsourcesplagiarismoverpage/wordcountriddledwithtyposunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoicestonedor drunkpaperwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunderpage/wordcountnoanalysisjustsummarywrongcitationformatnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourinsanesourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynohistoriographyevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespaceintro hookthatmakes nosenseincomprehensiblegrammarnoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionnocitationsorsourcesplagiarismoverpage/wordcountriddledwithtyposunintelligibleargumentalmostwholly inpassivevoicestonedor drunkpaperwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalunderpage/wordcountnoanalysisjustsummarywrongcitationformatnoindent/linebreaksthey'rereaching,yourhonourinsanesourcespaper fromother subjectposing ashistory

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. no historiography
  2. evidence doesn't support points
  3. most sentences are run-ons
  4. huge quotes to waste space
  5. intro hook that makes no sense
  6. incomprehensible grammar
  7. no primary sources
  8. trying to badly justify a political position
  9. no citations or sources
  10. plagiarism
  11. over page/word count
  12. riddled with typos
  13. unintelligible argument
  14. almost wholly in passive voice
  15. stoned or drunk paper
  16. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  17. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  18. under page/word count
  19. no analysis just summary
  20. wrong citation format
  21. no indent/line breaks
  22. they're reaching, your honour
  23. insane sources
  24. paper from other subject posing as history