evidencedoesn'tsupportpointsmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespaceplagiarismthey'rereaching,yourhonourinsanesourcesincomprehensiblegrammaralmostwholly inpassivevoiceunintelligibleargumenttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionoverpage/wordcountnohistoriographynoprimarysourcesriddledwithtypospaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryunderpage/wordcountwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalstonedor drunkpaperintro hookthatmakes nosensewaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectwrongcitationformatnoanalysisjustsummarynoindent/linebreaksnocitationsorsourcesevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsmostsentencesare run-onshugequotes towastespaceplagiarismthey'rereaching,yourhonourinsanesourcesincomprehensiblegrammaralmostwholly inpassivevoiceunintelligibleargumenttrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionoverpage/wordcountnohistoriographynoprimarysourcesriddledwithtypospaper fromother subjectposing ashistoryunderpage/wordcountwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalstonedor drunkpaperintro hookthatmakes nosensewaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectwrongcitationformatnoanalysisjustsummarynoindent/linebreaksnocitationsorsources

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. evidence doesn't support points
  2. most sentences are run-ons
  3. huge quotes to waste space
  4. plagiarism
  5. they're reaching, your honour
  6. insane sources
  7. incomprehensible grammar
  8. almost wholly in passive voice
  9. unintelligible argument
  10. trying to badly justify a political position
  11. over page/word count
  12. no historiography
  13. no primary sources
  14. riddled with typos
  15. paper from other subject posing as history
  16. under page/word count
  17. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  18. stoned or drunk paper
  19. intro hook that makes no sense
  20. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  21. wrong citation format
  22. no analysis just summary
  23. no indent/line breaks
  24. no citations or sources