plagiarismunderpage/wordcountpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynohistoriographyincomprehensiblegrammarinsanesourcesoverpage/wordcountstonedor drunkpaperwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposwrongcitationformatthey'rereaching,yourhonournoindent/linebreakshugequotes towastespacenoanalysisjustsummaryevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionmostsentencesare run-onsnocitationsorsourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoiceintro hookthatmakes nosenseunintelligibleargumentplagiarismunderpage/wordcountpaper fromother subjectposing ashistorynohistoriographyincomprehensiblegrammarinsanesourcesoverpage/wordcountstonedor drunkpaperwikipedia,dictionary.com,encyclopediabritannica, etalwaxing poeticabout themeaning ofhistory or thepaper subjectriddledwithtyposwrongcitationformatthey'rereaching,yourhonournoindent/linebreakshugequotes towastespacenoanalysisjustsummaryevidencedoesn'tsupportpointsnoprimarysourcestrying tobadly justifya politicalpositionmostsentencesare run-onsnocitationsorsourcesalmostwholly inpassivevoiceintro hookthatmakes nosenseunintelligibleargument

bad paper bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. plagiarism
  2. under page/word count
  3. paper from other subject posing as history
  4. no historiography
  5. incomprehensible grammar
  6. insane sources
  7. over page/word count
  8. stoned or drunk paper
  9. wikipedia, dictionary.com, encyclopedia britannica, et al
  10. waxing poetic about the meaning of history or the paper subject
  11. riddled with typos
  12. wrong citation format
  13. they're reaching, your honour
  14. no indent/line breaks
  15. huge quotes to waste space
  16. no analysis just summary
  17. evidence doesn't support points
  18. no primary sources
  19. trying to badly justify a political position
  20. most sentences are run-ons
  21. no citations or sources
  22. almost wholly in passive voice
  23. intro hook that makes no sense
  24. unintelligible argument