SIunitsHow do theseresultscompare to Xcode/nucleardata library?Measurementsof gaps withinthe assemblyIt is at thediscretionof theevaluatorBias vs.simplificationSimplerDetailedModelsThatinformationis included inan appendixConcerns about usingaconservative/boundinguncertaintyAnyformatting/editorialissueHow wasthecompositiondetermined?Uncertaintiesare notcorrectlypropagatedHow wasthe reactorperiodmeasured?There is anuncertaintythat has notbeenevaluatedPreservingmass vs.densityThisdiscussionisn’t relevantto theevaluationIs thisappropriateto report inSection 1?Was anindependentmodelcreated?AdjointSensitivitiesHigherresolution/vectorimagesTheuncertaintyguide isout of dateHow was thiscomponentmanufactured?How weredimensionalmeasurementsperformed?Theuncertaintyreported istoo lowMilliondollartableSIunitsHow do theseresultscompare to Xcode/nucleardata library?Measurementsof gaps withinthe assemblyIt is at thediscretionof theevaluatorBias vs.simplificationSimplerDetailedModelsThatinformationis included inan appendixConcerns about usingaconservative/boundinguncertaintyAnyformatting/editorialissueHow wasthecompositiondetermined?Uncertaintiesare notcorrectlypropagatedHow wasthe reactorperiodmeasured?There is anuncertaintythat has notbeenevaluatedPreservingmass vs.densityThisdiscussionisn’t relevantto theevaluationIs thisappropriateto report inSection 1?Was anindependentmodelcreated?AdjointSensitivitiesHigherresolution/vectorimagesTheuncertaintyguide isout of dateHow was thiscomponentmanufactured?How weredimensionalmeasurementsperformed?Theuncertaintyreported istoo lowMilliondollartable

2024 ICSBEP TRG - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. SI units
  2. How do these results compare to X code/nuclear data library?
  3. Measurements of gaps within the assembly
  4. It is at the discretion of the evaluator
  5. Bias vs. simplification
  6. Simpler Detailed Models
  7. That information is included in an appendix
  8. Concerns about using a conservative/bounding uncertainty
  9. Any formatting/editorial issue
  10. How was the composition determined?
  11. Uncertainties are not correctly propagated
  12. How was the reactor period measured?
  13. There is an uncertainty that has not been evaluated
  14. Preserving mass vs. density
  15. This discussion isn’t relevant to the evaluation
  16. Is this appropriate to report in Section 1?
  17. Was an independent model created?
  18. Adjoint Sensitivities
  19. Higher resolution/vector images
  20. The uncertainty guide is out of date
  21. How was this component manufactured?
  22. How were dimensional measurements performed?
  23. The uncertainty reported is too low
  24. Million dollar table