(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
FREE
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
Provides a definition for private nuisance
S.2(4)(a)
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
FREE
FREE
Cook v Square [1992]
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
The Wagon Mound No.1
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
That the damage is unreasonable
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Tetley v Chitty [1986]
Tangible Interference
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
