(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
FREE
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
That the damage is unreasonable
Tangible Interference
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
FREE
S.2(4)(a)
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
FREE
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
The Wagon Mound No.1
Cook v Square [1992]
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
Tetley v Chitty [1986]
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
