(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
FREE
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
S.2(4)(a)
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
Tangible Interference
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
That the damage is unreasonable
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
