Illegal activity(a defencewhere C isengaging inillegal activity)Wilsons vClydeCoal[1938]Benjaminv Storr[1874]A newintervening act– which is abreak in thechain ofcausationHughes vLordAdvocate[1963]Cook vSquare[1992]• The type ofdamage caused• The way in whichthe damage wascaused• The extent ofdamage caused A defencewhere theblame for thedamage atissue isapportioned. Occupierdepended on1)Occupation,OR 2) control FREES.2(4)(a)KennawayvThomson[1981]That thedamage isunreasonableBolton vStone;Castle v StAugustineLinks [1922]FREEThe purposeof the tort ofprivatenuisanceTransco plc vStockportMetopolitanBoroughCouncil [2004] Malone vLasky;Hunter vCanaryWharfCambridgeWater Co vEasternCountiesLeather plc[1994]Swaine vG NorthernRy Co[1864]FREEProvides adefinitionfor privatenuisanceSim vStretch[1935];s.1(1) of theDA 2013Yes,unders.1(3)OLA 1984 Voluntaryassumptionofrisk/consentas a defence1. Provision ofcompetent staff ofmen;2. Adequate plant andequipment;3. An effective system;and4. A safe place of work Tetleyv Chitty[1986]Andrea v Selfridge &Co Ltd [1938], Halseyv Esso Petroleum[1961], De Keyser’sRoyal Hotel v Spicer[194], Kennaway vThomson [1981]TheWagonMoundNo.1TangibleInterferenceSmith vLeech-Brain & CoLtd [1962Illegal activity(a defencewhere C isengaging inillegal activity)Wilsons vClydeCoal[1938]Benjaminv Storr[1874]A newintervening act– which is abreak in thechain ofcausationHughes vLordAdvocate[1963]Cook vSquare[1992]• The type ofdamage caused• The way in whichthe damage wascaused• The extent ofdamage caused A defencewhere theblame for thedamage atissue isapportioned. Occupierdepended on1)Occupation,OR 2) control FREES.2(4)(a)KennawayvThomson[1981]That thedamage isunreasonableBolton vStone;Castle v StAugustineLinks [1922]FREEThe purposeof the tort ofprivatenuisanceTransco plc vStockportMetopolitanBoroughCouncil [2004] Malone vLasky;Hunter vCanaryWharfCambridgeWater Co vEasternCountiesLeather plc[1994]Swaine vG NorthernRy Co[1864]FREEProvides adefinitionfor privatenuisanceSim vStretch[1935];s.1(1) of theDA 2013Yes,unders.1(3)OLA 1984 Voluntaryassumptionofrisk/consentas a defence1. Provision ofcompetent staff ofmen;2. Adequate plant andequipment;3. An effective system;and4. A safe place of work Tetleyv Chitty[1986]Andrea v Selfridge &Co Ltd [1938], Halseyv Esso Petroleum[1961], De Keyser’sRoyal Hotel v Spicer[194], Kennaway vThomson [1981]TheWagonMoundNo.1TangibleInterferenceSmith vLeech-Brain & CoLtd [1962

Tortious Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
  1. Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
  2. Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
  3. Benjamin v Storr [1874]
  4. A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
  5. Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
  6. Cook v Square [1992]
  7. • The type of damage caused • The way in which the damage was caused • The extent of damage caused
  8. A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
  9. Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
  10. FREE
  11. S.2(4)(a)
  12. Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
  13. That the damage is unreasonable
  14. Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
  15. FREE
  16. The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
  17. Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
  18. Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
  19. Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
  20. Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
  21. FREE
  22. Provides a definition for private nuisance
  23. Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
  24. Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
  25. Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
  26. 1. Provision of competent staff of men; 2. Adequate plant and equipment; 3. An effective system; and 4. A safe place of work
  27. Tetley v Chitty [1986]
  28. Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
  29. The Wagon Mound No.1
  30. Tangible Interference
  31. Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962