(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
FREE
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
FREE
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
S.2(4)(a)
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Tangible Interference
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
Cook v Square [1992]
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
Tetley v Chitty [1986]
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
FREE
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
The Wagon Mound No.1
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
