(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Cook v Square [1992]
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
FREE
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
Tangible Interference
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
FREE
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
S.2(4)(a)
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
FREE
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
