Andrea v Selfridge &Co Ltd [1938], Halseyv Esso Petroleum[1961], De Keyser’sRoyal Hotel v Spicer[194], Kennaway vThomson [1981]Illegal activity(a defencewhere C isengaging inillegal activity)A newintervening act– which is abreak in thechain ofcausationThe purposeof the tort ofprivatenuisanceCook vSquare[1992]Yes,unders.1(3)OLA 1984 Provides adefinitionfor privatenuisanceFREEKennawayvThomson[1981]TheWagonMoundNo.1FREEMalone vLasky;Hunter vCanaryWharfCambridgeWater Co vEasternCountiesLeather plc[1994]Occupierdepended on1)Occupation,OR 2) control 1. Provision ofcompetent staff ofmen;2. Adequate plant andequipment;3. An effective system;and4. A safe place of work Sim vStretch[1935];s.1(1) of theDA 2013That thedamage isunreasonableVoluntaryassumptionofrisk/consentas a defenceTetleyv Chitty[1986]FREESwaine vG NorthernRy Co[1864]Benjaminv Storr[1874]A defencewhere theblame for thedamage atissue isapportioned. Bolton vStone;Castle v StAugustineLinks [1922]Hughes vLordAdvocate[1963]• The type ofdamage caused• The way in whichthe damage wascaused• The extent ofdamage caused Wilsons vClydeCoal[1938]TangibleInterferenceTransco plc vStockportMetopolitanBoroughCouncil [2004] S.2(4)(a)Smith vLeech-Brain & CoLtd [1962Andrea v Selfridge &Co Ltd [1938], Halseyv Esso Petroleum[1961], De Keyser’sRoyal Hotel v Spicer[194], Kennaway vThomson [1981]Illegal activity(a defencewhere C isengaging inillegal activity)A newintervening act– which is abreak in thechain ofcausationThe purposeof the tort ofprivatenuisanceCook vSquare[1992]Yes,unders.1(3)OLA 1984 Provides adefinitionfor privatenuisanceFREEKennawayvThomson[1981]TheWagonMoundNo.1FREEMalone vLasky;Hunter vCanaryWharfCambridgeWater Co vEasternCountiesLeather plc[1994]Occupierdepended on1)Occupation,OR 2) control 1. Provision ofcompetent staff ofmen;2. Adequate plant andequipment;3. An effective system;and4. A safe place of work Sim vStretch[1935];s.1(1) of theDA 2013That thedamage isunreasonableVoluntaryassumptionofrisk/consentas a defenceTetleyv Chitty[1986]FREESwaine vG NorthernRy Co[1864]Benjaminv Storr[1874]A defencewhere theblame for thedamage atissue isapportioned. Bolton vStone;Castle v StAugustineLinks [1922]Hughes vLordAdvocate[1963]• The type ofdamage caused• The way in whichthe damage wascaused• The extent ofdamage caused Wilsons vClydeCoal[1938]TangibleInterferenceTransco plc vStockportMetopolitanBoroughCouncil [2004] S.2(4)(a)Smith vLeech-Brain & CoLtd [1962

Tortious Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
  1. Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
  2. Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
  3. A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
  4. The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
  5. Cook v Square [1992]
  6. Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
  7. Provides a definition for private nuisance
  8. FREE
  9. Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
  10. The Wagon Mound No.1
  11. FREE
  12. Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
  13. Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
  14. Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
  15. 1. Provision of competent staff of men; 2. Adequate plant and equipment; 3. An effective system; and 4. A safe place of work
  16. Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
  17. That the damage is unreasonable
  18. Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
  19. Tetley v Chitty [1986]
  20. FREE
  21. Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
  22. Benjamin v Storr [1874]
  23. A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
  24. Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
  25. Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
  26. • The type of damage caused • The way in which the damage was caused • The extent of damage caused
  27. Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
  28. Tangible Interference
  29. Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
  30. S.2(4)(a)
  31. Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962