(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
FREE
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
The Wagon Mound No.1
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Tangible Interference
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
Tetley v Chitty [1986]
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
S.2(4)(a)
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
FREE
FREE
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
That the damage is unreasonable
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
