(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
S.2(4)(a)
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
The Wagon Mound No.1
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
Tangible Interference
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
Tetley v Chitty [1986]
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
Cook v Square [1992]
FREE
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
FREE
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Voluntary assumption of risk/consent as a defence
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
That the damage is unreasonable
FREE
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
