(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
The Wagon Mound No.1
Smith v Leech-Brain & Co Ltd [1962
A new intervening act – which is a break in the chain of causation
Occupier depended on 1) Occupation, OR 2) control
Cook v Square [1992]
Yes, under s.1(3) OLA 1984
A defence where the blame for the damage at issue is apportioned.
Sim v Stretch [1935]; s.1(1) of the DA 2013
1. Provision of competent staff of men;
2. Adequate plant and equipment;
3. An effective system; and
4. A safe place of work
Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963]
Swaine v G Northern Ry Co [1864]
Bolton v Stone; Castle v St Augustine Links [1922]
Malone v Lasky; Hunter v Canary Wharf
• The type of damage caused
• The way in which the damage was caused
• The extent of damage caused
Transco plc v Stockport Metopolitan Borough Council [2004]
Benjamin v Storr [1874]
The purpose of the tort of private nuisance
That the damage is unreasonable
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1938], Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961], De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer [194], Kennaway v Thomson [1981]
FREE
Tangible Interference
Provides a definition for private nuisance
Wilsons v Clyde Coal [1938]
Illegal activity (a defence where C is engaging in illegal activity)
Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994]
