Lack of clarityaround OFACcompliance fromeither internal orexternal positionDidn’t completereportingreview beforeinitiating a newrequestForgot aboutlobbyingprotections(Project GrantRule/GeneralSupport)Didn’t realizewhat tax-structure didto impactsupport typesWork thatgainsadditionalscrutiny duringelection yearsTrusted what Iwas toldwithout gettingdocumentationDidn’t checkwith newgrantee abouttheir capacities(legal, fiscal,leadership)Moved tooquickly due todeadlines thatare beyondanyone’scontrolDidn’tconsider therhetoric inthe proposalShifting contextoutside of Fordwas ignored (i.e.world events,changes inleadership)Taxstructureof granteeunclearRelied on aninformalnetwork thathas no legalstructureDisabilityinclusionnotexploredDidn’tinitiate RDconsultearlyDidn’t bringin all teammembersearly enoughFinancialHealthAnalysis RedFlagsIgnoredDidn’t flag pre-approvalswhen addingdocumentationto the requestDidn’tconsiderwhatstructuremade senseConfusionabout fiscalsponsor vs.fiscal agentFrontloadedthe fundingwith a newgranteeRelied oninformalcommunicationversus what isembedded inFluxxProposaldidn’t matchconversationsLostcontactwithcontactAnti-discriminationlegal review forgrantees targetingspecificcommunities notinitiatedLack of clarityaround OFACcompliance fromeither internal orexternal positionDidn’t completereportingreview beforeinitiating a newrequestForgot aboutlobbyingprotections(Project GrantRule/GeneralSupport)Didn’t realizewhat tax-structure didto impactsupport typesWork thatgainsadditionalscrutiny duringelection yearsTrusted what Iwas toldwithout gettingdocumentationDidn’t checkwith newgrantee abouttheir capacities(legal, fiscal,leadership)Moved tooquickly due todeadlines thatare beyondanyone’scontrolDidn’tconsider therhetoric inthe proposalShifting contextoutside of Fordwas ignored (i.e.world events,changes inleadership)Taxstructureof granteeunclearRelied on aninformalnetwork thathas no legalstructureDisabilityinclusionnotexploredDidn’tinitiate RDconsultearlyDidn’t bringin all teammembersearly enoughFinancialHealthAnalysis RedFlagsIgnoredDidn’t flag pre-approvalswhen addingdocumentationto the requestDidn’tconsiderwhatstructuremade senseConfusionabout fiscalsponsor vs.fiscal agentFrontloadedthe fundingwith a newgranteeRelied oninformalcommunicationversus what isembedded inFluxxProposaldidn’t matchconversationsLostcontactwithcontactAnti-discriminationlegal review forgrantees targetingspecificcommunities notinitiated

FF - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Lack of clarity around OFAC compliance from either internal or external position
  2. Didn’t complete reporting review before initiating a new request
  3. Forgot about lobbying protections (Project Grant Rule/General Support)
  4. Didn’t realize what tax-structure did to impact support types
  5. Work that gains additional scrutiny during election years
  6. Trusted what I was told without getting documentation
  7. Didn’t check with new grantee about their capacities (legal, fiscal, leadership)
  8. Moved too quickly due to deadlines that are beyond anyone’s control
  9. Didn’t consider the rhetoric in the proposal
  10. Shifting context outside of Ford was ignored (i.e. world events, changes in leadership)
  11. Tax structure of grantee unclear
  12. Relied on an informal network that has no legal structure
  13. Disability inclusion not explored
  14. Didn’t initiate RD consult early
  15. Didn’t bring in all team members early enough
  16. Financial Health Analysis Red Flags Ignored
  17. Didn’t flag pre-approvals when adding documentation to the request
  18. Didn’t consider what structure made sense
  19. Confusion about fiscal sponsor vs. fiscal agent
  20. Frontloaded the funding with a new grantee
  21. Relied on informal communication versus what is embedded in Fluxx
  22. Proposal didn’t match conversations
  23. Lost contact with contact
  24. Anti-discrimination legal review for grantees targeting specific communities not initiated