Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  2. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  3. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  4. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  5. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  6. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  7. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)
  8. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  9. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  10. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  11. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  12. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  13. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)
  14. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)
  15. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  16. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  17. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  18. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  19. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  20. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  21. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)
  22. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)
  23. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  24. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  25. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)