Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  2. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  3. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  4. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  5. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)
  6. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  7. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  8. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  9. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  10. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  11. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)
  12. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)
  13. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  14. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  15. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)
  16. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  17. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  18. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)
  19. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  20. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  21. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  22. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  23. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  24. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  25. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)