Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  2. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  3. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  4. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)
  5. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  6. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  7. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)
  8. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  9. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  10. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  11. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  12. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)
  13. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  14. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)
  15. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  16. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  17. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  18. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  19. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  20. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  21. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  22. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  23. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)
  24. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  25. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)