Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  2. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  3. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  4. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  5. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  6. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  7. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)
  8. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)
  9. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  10. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  11. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  12. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  13. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  14. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)
  15. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  16. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  17. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  18. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)
  19. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  20. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  21. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  22. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)
  23. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  24. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  25. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)