Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  2. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  3. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  4. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  5. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  6. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  7. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)
  8. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  9. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  10. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  11. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)
  12. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  13. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)
  14. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  15. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)
  16. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  17. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  18. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)
  19. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  20. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  21. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  22. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  23. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  24. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  25. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)