Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)Nterms that areapplied to differentthings but haverelated meanings(analogous terms)Ithe status of aterm in regardto its extension(distribution)Gis the subjectof theconclusion(minor term)Ihas to do withwhether aproposition isaffirmative ornegative(quality)Owhen the mind makesa connection betweenthe terms in asyllogism, showing theconclusion to derivefrom the premises(deductive inference)Iterms that, althoughspelled andpronounced exactlyalike, have entirelydifferent andunrelated meanings(equivocal terms)G1. change thequality of thesentence2. negate thepredicate(obversion)Gif two premises areaffirmative, theconclusion mustalso be affirmative(Rule VI)Gwhen Rule I isviolated by usingthe middle termequivocally(Fallacy ofEquivocation)Nhas to do withwhether aproposition isuniversal orparticular(quantity)Iwhen weviolate Rule III(Fallacy ofIllicit Process)Nwhen we violateRule I by usingmore than 3 terms(Fallacy of FourTerms)Bthe word in theproposition thatconnects/relatesthe subject to thepredicate(copula)Bterms that haveexactly the samemeaning no matterwhen or how theyare used(univocal terms)Oif either premiseis negative, theconclusion mustalso be negative(Rule VII)B1. obvert thestatement2. convert thestatement3. obvert thestatement again(contraposition)Nis thepredicate ofthe conclusion(major term)Bthe act of seeingor hearing orsmelling or tastingor touching(sense perception)Ointerchangingthe subject andthe predicate(conversion)Bwhen weviolate Rule V(Fallacy ofExclusivePremises)Na diagram designed tohelp you classify anddivide all of reality, inorder to showsimilarities/differencesamong physicalobjects(Porphyrian Tree)Gthe verbalexpression ofdeductiveinference(syllogism)Iwhat a conceptrefers to; one ofthe properties ofSimpleApprehension(extension)Owhen weviolate Rule IV(Fallacy ofUndistributedMiddle)Ois the term thatappears in bothpremises, but notin the conclusion(middle term)

Reasoning - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. N terms that are applied to different things but have related meanings (analogous terms)
  2. I the status of a term in regard to its extension (distribution)
  3. G is the subject of the conclusion (minor term)
  4. I has to do with whether a proposition is affirmative or negative (quality)
  5. O when the mind makes a connection between the terms in a syllogism, showing the conclusion to derive from the premises (deductive inference)
  6. I terms that, although spelled and pronounced exactly alike, have entirely different and unrelated meanings (equivocal terms)
  7. G 1. change the quality of the sentence 2. negate the predicate (obversion)
  8. G if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative (Rule VI)
  9. G when Rule I is violated by using the middle term equivocally (Fallacy of Equivocation)
  10. N has to do with whether a proposition is universal or particular (quantity)
  11. I when we violate Rule III (Fallacy of Illicit Process)
  12. N when we violate Rule I by using more than 3 terms (Fallacy of Four Terms)
  13. B the word in the proposition that connects/relates the subject to the predicate (copula)
  14. B terms that have exactly the same meaning no matter when or how they are used (univocal terms)
  15. O if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative (Rule VII)
  16. B 1. obvert the statement 2. convert the statement 3. obvert the statement again (contraposition)
  17. N is the predicate of the conclusion (major term)
  18. B the act of seeing or hearing or smelling or tasting or touching (sense perception)
  19. O interchanging the subject and the predicate (conversion)
  20. B when we violate Rule V (Fallacy of Exclusive Premises)
  21. N a diagram designed to help you classify and divide all of reality, in order to show similarities/differences among physical objects (Porphyrian Tree)
  22. G the verbal expression of deductive inference (syllogism)
  23. I what a concept refers to; one of the properties of Simple Apprehension (extension)
  24. O when we violate Rule IV (Fallacy of Undistributed Middle)
  25. O is the term that appears in both premises, but not in the conclusion (middle term)