Presented andresponded to adistorted versionof conversationpartner’sargument (strawman)Attempted tomanipulate byoffering evidencethat he or sheknew was wrongor distorted*Expressedappreciationfor skepticismor dissentingviewSpoke toconversationpartner as ifthey were achild in need ofeducationDiverted attentionfrom the quality ofthe reasons by tryingto provoke emotionalresponses from theirconversation partnerOfferedreasons thatare notaccessible to allcitizens within aDemocracyReasons and/orevidenceoffered was noteven plausiblytrueRaisedquestions aboutspecific claimsoffered byconversationpartnerWorked to identifyand introduce thebest reasons tosupport theirconversationpartner’s claimsPre-emptivelyacknowledgeddissentingviewClaim defendeddid not follow fromthe reasonsand/or evidenceoffered to supportthe claimDivertedattention fromthe quality ofthe reasons byexpressingmoral outrageDivertedattention fromthe quality ofthe reasons bychanging thesubjectPresented andresponded to anargument theirconversationpartner nevermade (hollowman)Communicatedwith theaudience,rather than theirconversationpartnerDiverted attentionfrom the quality ofthe reasons byattacking thecharacter of theconversationpartnerAdmittedevidenceand/orreasoning wasmistakenPrevented conversationpartner from offeringarguments orresponses toarguments byinterrupting and/ordominating theconversationExpressed awillingnessto changeone’s mindDisplayed anability to listen byaccuratelysummarizing theclaims of theirconversationpartnerIdentifieddiversions andworked to refocusthe exchange onthe relevantreasonsAsked forclarification orconfirmation tomake sureargument wasaccuratelyunderstoodAdopted a newposition inresponse tocriticism (i.e.,changed one’smind)Presented andresponded to theweakest of theconversationpartner’sarguments (weakman)Attempted toendconversation byexpressing adesire to avoidconflictPresented andresponded to adistorted versionof conversationpartner’sargument (strawman)Attempted tomanipulate byoffering evidencethat he or sheknew was wrongor distorted*Expressedappreciationfor skepticismor dissentingviewSpoke toconversationpartner as ifthey were achild in need ofeducationDiverted attentionfrom the quality ofthe reasons by tryingto provoke emotionalresponses from theirconversation partnerOfferedreasons thatare notaccessible to allcitizens within aDemocracyReasons and/orevidenceoffered was noteven plausiblytrueRaisedquestions aboutspecific claimsoffered byconversationpartnerWorked to identifyand introduce thebest reasons tosupport theirconversationpartner’s claimsPre-emptivelyacknowledgeddissentingviewClaim defendeddid not follow fromthe reasonsand/or evidenceoffered to supportthe claimDivertedattention fromthe quality ofthe reasons byexpressingmoral outrageDivertedattention fromthe quality ofthe reasons bychanging thesubjectPresented andresponded to anargument theirconversationpartner nevermade (hollowman)Communicatedwith theaudience,rather than theirconversationpartnerDiverted attentionfrom the quality ofthe reasons byattacking thecharacter of theconversationpartnerAdmittedevidenceand/orreasoning wasmistakenPrevented conversationpartner from offeringarguments orresponses toarguments byinterrupting and/ordominating theconversationExpressed awillingnessto changeone’s mindDisplayed anability to listen byaccuratelysummarizing theclaims of theirconversationpartnerIdentifieddiversions andworked to refocusthe exchange onthe relevantreasonsAsked forclarification orconfirmation tomake sureargument wasaccuratelyunderstoodAdopted a newposition inresponse tocriticism (i.e.,changed one’smind)Presented andresponded to theweakest of theconversationpartner’sarguments (weakman)Attempted toendconversation byexpressing adesire to avoidconflict

Presidential Debate Disagreement Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. Presented and responded to a distorted version of conversation partner’s argument (straw man)
  2. Attempted to manipulate by offering evidence that he or she knew was wrong or distorted*
  3. Expressed appreciation for skepticism or dissenting view
  4. Spoke to conversation partner as if they were a child in need of education
  5. Diverted attention from the quality of the reasons by trying to provoke emotional responses from their conversation partner
  6. Offered reasons that are not accessible to all citizens within a Democracy
  7. Reasons and/or evidence offered was not even plausibly true
  8. Raised questions about specific claims offered by conversation partner
  9. Worked to identify and introduce the best reasons to support their conversation partner’s claims
  10. Pre-emptively acknowledged dissenting view
  11. Claim defended did not follow from the reasons and/or evidence offered to support the claim
  12. Diverted attention from the quality of the reasons by expressing moral outrage
  13. Diverted attention from the quality of the reasons by changing the subject
  14. Presented and responded to an argument their conversation partner never made (hollow man)
  15. Communicated with the audience, rather than their conversation partner
  16. Diverted attention from the quality of the reasons by attacking the character of the conversation partner
  17. Admitted evidence and/or reasoning was mistaken
  18. Prevented conversation partner from offering arguments or responses to arguments by interrupting and/or dominating the conversation
  19. Expressed a willingness to change one’s mind
  20. Displayed an ability to listen by accurately summarizing the claims of their conversation partner
  21. Identified diversions and worked to refocus the exchange on the relevant reasons
  22. Asked for clarification or confirmation to make sure argument was accurately understood
  23. Adopted a new position in response to criticism (i.e., changed one’s mind)
  24. Presented and responded to the weakest of the conversation partner’s arguments (weak man)
  25. Attempted to end conversation by expressing a desire to avoid conflict