# 2 Hypothesis in VTRA: Conspiracy of Two or More Most threat makers are imitators not innovators. PBAs: Plausibility, Baseline, Attack-Related Behaviours If the TAT is struggling with whether to activate the protocol - better safe than sorry, do it! Free! Treat the big things big and the little things little. No one just SNAPS! The better the data, the better the assessment. The better the assessment, the better the intervention. Triple C's" Cute, Concerning, Critical Quote that kills: "Good kid, no history of violence." #1 Hypothesis in VTRA: Cry for Help JMCC: Justification, Means, Consequences, Conditions The plague of VTRA: the unidimensional assessment. You are only as good as your hypothesis. IOC: Individual of Concern Low risk is NOT no risk. # 3 Hypothesis in VTRA: Fluidity ARTO: Assessment of Risk to Others Serious violence begets trauma AND serious trauma begets violence. The higher the anxiety, the greater the symptom development. VTRA is meant to be helpful, not hurtful. Serious violence is an evolutionary process. The higher the ACEs score, the greater the obligation to match resources to risk. TILI: trauma- informed, least intrusive interventions It is one thing to make a plausible threat; it is another to engage in behaviours consistent with the threat. # 2 Hypothesis in VTRA: Conspiracy of Two or More Most threat makers are imitators not innovators. PBAs: Plausibility, Baseline, Attack-Related Behaviours If the TAT is struggling with whether to activate the protocol - better safe than sorry, do it! Free! Treat the big things big and the little things little. No one just SNAPS! The better the data, the better the assessment. The better the assessment, the better the intervention. Triple C's" Cute, Concerning, Critical Quote that kills: "Good kid, no history of violence." #1 Hypothesis in VTRA: Cry for Help JMCC: Justification, Means, Consequences, Conditions The plague of VTRA: the unidimensional assessment. You are only as good as your hypothesis. IOC: Individual of Concern Low risk is NOT no risk. # 3 Hypothesis in VTRA: Fluidity ARTO: Assessment of Risk to Others Serious violence begets trauma AND serious trauma begets violence. The higher the anxiety, the greater the symptom development. VTRA is meant to be helpful, not hurtful. Serious violence is an evolutionary process. The higher the ACEs score, the greater the obligation to match resources to risk. TILI: trauma- informed, least intrusive interventions It is one thing to make a plausible threat; it is another to engage in behaviours consistent with the threat.
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
# 2 Hypothesis in VTRA: Conspiracy of Two or More
Most threat makers are imitators not innovators.
PBAs: Plausibility, Baseline, Attack-Related Behaviours
If the TAT is struggling with whether to activate the protocol - better safe than sorry, do it!
Free!
Treat the big things big and the little things little.
No one just SNAPS!
The better the data, the better the assessment. The better the assessment, the better the intervention.
Triple C's" Cute, Concerning, Critical
Quote that kills: "Good kid, no history of violence."
#1 Hypothesis in VTRA: Cry for Help
JMCC: Justification, Means, Consequences, Conditions
The plague of VTRA: the unidimensional assessment.
You are only as good as your hypothesis.
IOC: Individual of Concern
Low risk is NOT no risk.
# 3 Hypothesis in VTRA: Fluidity
ARTO: Assessment of Risk to Others
Serious violence begets trauma AND serious trauma begets violence.
The higher the anxiety, the greater the symptom development.
VTRA is meant to be helpful, not hurtful.
Serious violence is an evolutionary process.
The higher the ACEs score, the greater the obligation to match resources to risk.
TILI: trauma-informed, least intrusive interventions
It is one thing to make a plausible threat; it is another to engage in behaviours consistent with the threat.