# 2Hypothesis inVTRA:Conspiracy ofTwo or MoreMost threatmakers areimitators notinnovators.PBAs:Plausibility,Baseline,Attack-RelatedBehavioursIf the TAT isstruggling withwhether to activatethe protocol -better safe thansorry, do it!Free!Treat the bigthings bigand the littlethings little.No onejustSNAPS!The better thedata, the better theassessment. Thebetter theassessment, thebetter theintervention.Triple C's"Cute,Concerning,CriticalQuote thatkills: "Goodkid, nohistory ofviolence."#1Hypothesisin VTRA:Cry for HelpJMCC:Justification,Means,Consequences,ConditionsThe plague ofVTRA: theunidimensionalassessment. You are onlyas good asyourhypothesis. IOC:IndividualofConcernLow riskis NOTno risk.# 3Hypothesisin VTRA:FluidityARTO:Assessmentof Risk toOthersSeriousviolence begetstrauma ANDserious traumabegetsviolence.The higherthe anxiety,the greaterthe symptomdevelopment.VTRA ismeant tobe helpful,not hurtful.Seriousviolence isanevolutionaryprocess.The higher theACEs score, thegreater theobligation tomatch resourcesto risk.TILI: trauma-informed,leastintrusiveinterventionsIt is one thing tomake a plausiblethreat; it is anotherto engage inbehavioursconsistent with thethreat.# 2Hypothesis inVTRA:Conspiracy ofTwo or MoreMost threatmakers areimitators notinnovators.PBAs:Plausibility,Baseline,Attack-RelatedBehavioursIf the TAT isstruggling withwhether to activatethe protocol -better safe thansorry, do it!Free!Treat the bigthings bigand the littlethings little.No onejustSNAPS!The better thedata, the better theassessment. Thebetter theassessment, thebetter theintervention.Triple C's"Cute,Concerning,CriticalQuote thatkills: "Goodkid, nohistory ofviolence."#1Hypothesisin VTRA:Cry for HelpJMCC:Justification,Means,Consequences,ConditionsThe plague ofVTRA: theunidimensionalassessment. You are onlyas good asyourhypothesis. IOC:IndividualofConcernLow riskis NOTno risk.# 3Hypothesisin VTRA:FluidityARTO:Assessmentof Risk toOthersSeriousviolence begetstrauma ANDserious traumabegetsviolence.The higherthe anxiety,the greaterthe symptomdevelopment.VTRA ismeant tobe helpful,not hurtful.Seriousviolence isanevolutionaryprocess.The higher theACEs score, thegreater theobligation tomatch resourcesto risk.TILI: trauma-informed,leastintrusiveinterventionsIt is one thing tomake a plausiblethreat; it is anotherto engage inbehavioursconsistent with thethreat.

Jingle Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. # 2 Hypothesis in VTRA: Conspiracy of Two or More
  2. Most threat makers are imitators not innovators.
  3. PBAs: Plausibility, Baseline, Attack-Related Behaviours
  4. If the TAT is struggling with whether to activate the protocol - better safe than sorry, do it!
  5. Free!
  6. Treat the big things big and the little things little.
  7. No one just SNAPS!
  8. The better the data, the better the assessment. The better the assessment, the better the intervention.
  9. Triple C's" Cute, Concerning, Critical
  10. Quote that kills: "Good kid, no history of violence."
  11. #1 Hypothesis in VTRA: Cry for Help
  12. JMCC: Justification, Means, Consequences, Conditions
  13. The plague of VTRA: the unidimensional assessment.
  14. You are only as good as your hypothesis.
  15. IOC: Individual of Concern
  16. Low risk is NOT no risk.
  17. # 3 Hypothesis in VTRA: Fluidity
  18. ARTO: Assessment of Risk to Others
  19. Serious violence begets trauma AND serious trauma begets violence.
  20. The higher the anxiety, the greater the symptom development.
  21. VTRA is meant to be helpful, not hurtful.
  22. Serious violence is an evolutionary process.
  23. The higher the ACEs score, the greater the obligation to match resources to risk.
  24. TILI: trauma-informed, least intrusive interventions
  25. It is one thing to make a plausible threat; it is another to engage in behaviours consistent with the threat.