JUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"JUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVESOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"JUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"JUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVESOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  2. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  3. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  4. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  5. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  6. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  7. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  8. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  9. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  10. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  11. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  12. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  13. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  14. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  15. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  16. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  17. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  18. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  19. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  20. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  21. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  22. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  23. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  24. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  25. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  26. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  27. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  28. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  29. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  30. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  31. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  32. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  33. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"