TOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"SOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIETWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCETOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"SOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIETWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCE

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  2. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  3. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  4. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  5. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  6. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  7. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  8. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  9. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  10. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  11. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  12. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  13. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  14. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  15. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  16. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  17. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  18. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  19. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  20. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  21. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  22. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  23. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  24. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  25. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  26. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  27. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  28. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  29. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  30. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  31. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  32. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  33. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE