(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
