TEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"CROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIENEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"CROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIENEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUES

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  2. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  3. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  4. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  5. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  6. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  7. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  8. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  9. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  10. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  11. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  12. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  13. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  14. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  15. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  16. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  17. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  18. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  19. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  20. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  21. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  22. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  23. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  24. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  25. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  26. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  27. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  28. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  29. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  30. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  31. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  32. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  33. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES