ENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"SOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"SOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKED

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  2. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  3. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  4. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  5. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  6. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  7. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  8. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  9. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  10. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  11. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  12. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  13. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  14. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  15. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  16. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  17. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  18. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  19. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  20. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  21. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  22. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  23. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  24. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  25. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  26. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  27. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  28. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  29. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  30. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  31. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  32. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  33. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED