AFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"NEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"NEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIESAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGED

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  2. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  3. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  4. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  5. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  6. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  7. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  8. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  9. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  10. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  11. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  12. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  13. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  14. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  15. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  16. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  17. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  18. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  19. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  20. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  21. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  22. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  23. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  24. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  25. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  26. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  27. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  28. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  29. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  30. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  31. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  32. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  33. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED