JUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"JUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"HAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTETEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"JUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"HAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTETEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUES

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  2. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  3. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  4. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  5. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  6. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  7. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  8. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  9. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  10. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  11. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  12. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  13. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  14. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  15. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  16. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  17. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  18. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  19. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  20. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  21. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  22. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  23. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  24. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  25. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  26. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  27. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  28. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  29. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  30. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  31. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  32. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  33. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES