JUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORECROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORECROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGES

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  2. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  3. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  4. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  5. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  6. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  7. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  8. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  9. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  10. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  11. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  12. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  13. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  14. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  15. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  16. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  17. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  18. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  19. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  20. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  21. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  22. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  23. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  24. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  25. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  26. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  27. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  28. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  29. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  30. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  31. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  32. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  33. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES