ENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIECROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"TOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIECROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"DEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EX

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  2. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  3. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  4. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  5. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  6. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  7. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  8. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  9. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  10. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  11. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  12. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  13. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  14. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  15. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  16. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  17. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  18. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  19. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  20. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  21. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  22. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  23. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  24. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  25. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  26. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  27. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  28. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  29. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  30. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  31. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  32. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  33. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX