SOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"PARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"HAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATENEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVETOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"PARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"HAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMCROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATENEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXAFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVETOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECH

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  2. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  3. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  4. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  5. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  6. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  7. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  8. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  9. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  10. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  11. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  12. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  13. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  14. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  15. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  16. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  17. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  18. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  19. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  20. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  21. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  22. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  23. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  24. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  25. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  26. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  27. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  28. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  29. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  30. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  31. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  32. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  33. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH