AFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"AFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESPARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MORENEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHNEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGEA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVESOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTTOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"AFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESSOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIEDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVESOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCEDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PEN

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  2. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  3. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  4. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  5. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  6. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  7. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  8. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  9. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  10. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  11. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  12. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  13. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  14. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  15. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  16. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  17. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  18. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  19. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  20. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  21. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  22. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  23. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  24. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  25. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  26. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  27. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  28. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  29. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  30. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  31. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  32. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED
  33. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN