TEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"AFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"PARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKEDTEAM RANOUT OF PREPTIME BEFORELAST SPEECHNEGATIVE HASMORE THAN 2DISADVANTAGESDEBATERENDSSPEECHWITH AQUOTEEVIDENCEFROM 2025BROUGHTUPJUDGEUSESWHOLE 10MIN FORFEEDBACKDEBATERUSES MORETHAN ONECOLOR PENFUNDING ISANYTHINGBUT"NORMALMEANS"AFFIRMATIVEDEFINES THEWORDPOLICYDEBATERSAYS "GOODROUND"WHEN THEYSHAKEHANDSTWO ORMOREMANDATESIN 1ACAFFIRMATIVEHAS ATLEAST 2ADVANTAGESA DEFINITIONISCHALLENGEDBY NEGATIVETOPICALITY ISCHALLENGEDTEAM TOLDJUDGE ANARGUMENTFLOWS TOTHEMSOMEONEGAVE ASPEECHWITH NOEVIDENCECROSSEXAMINERHAS AT LEAST3 POST ITNOTESNEGATIVEUSES ADISADVANTAGESOMEONE SAYSTHEIR PARTNERWILL BRINGTHAT EVIDENCEUP IN THEIRNEXT SPEECHEVIDENCEBROUGHT UPTHAT IS 1OYEARS OLDOR MOREAT LEAST 4DEFINITIONSARE GIVENBYAFFIRMATIVEENFORCEMENTINCLUDES 2 ORMOREAGENCIESJUDGELOOKSYOUNGERTHAN YOURPARENTSAME PIECEOF EVIDENCEIS QUOTEDTWICE IN ONESPEECHSOMEONEQUOTES AFORMERPRESIDENTSOMEONESTARTS ASPEECHWITH"JUDGE"PARTNERACTUALLYBRINGS THATEVIDENCE UPIN THEIRNEXT SPEECHHAS 3HARMS ORMORE INONESPEECHNEGATIVEASKED FORCREDENTIALSIN CROSS EXSOMEONEISWEARINGA BOW TIENEGATIVEARGUED 3OR MORESTOCKISSUESCROSSEXAMINERASKSAFFIRMATIVETO REPEATMANDATEDEBATERBRINGS UPRULE FROMCCAGUIDELINESDEBATERHAS MORETHAN 3BOOKSSTACKED

RHETORIC DEBATE 2025 - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  1. TEAM RAN OUT OF PREP TIME BEFORE LAST SPEECH
  2. NEGATIVE HAS MORE THAN 2 DISADVANTAGES
  3. DEBATER ENDS SPEECH WITH A QUOTE
  4. EVIDENCE FROM 2025 BROUGHT UP
  5. JUDGE USES WHOLE 10 MIN FOR FEEDBACK
  6. DEBATER USES MORE THAN ONE COLOR PEN
  7. FUNDING IS ANYTHING BUT "NORMAL MEANS"
  8. AFFIRMATIVE DEFINES THE WORD POLICY
  9. DEBATER SAYS "GOOD ROUND" WHEN THEY SHAKE HANDS
  10. TWO OR MORE MANDATES IN 1AC
  11. AFFIRMATIVE HAS AT LEAST 2 ADVANTAGES
  12. A DEFINITION IS CHALLENGED BY NEGATIVE
  13. TOPICALITY IS CHALLENGED
  14. TEAM TOLD JUDGE AN ARGUMENT FLOWS TO THEM
  15. SOMEONE GAVE A SPEECH WITH NO EVIDENCE
  16. CROSS EXAMINER HAS AT LEAST 3 POST IT NOTES
  17. NEGATIVE USES A DISADVANTAGE
  18. SOMEONE SAYS THEIR PARTNER WILL BRING THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  19. EVIDENCE BROUGHT UP THAT IS 1O YEARS OLD OR MORE
  20. AT LEAST 4 DEFINITIONS ARE GIVEN BY AFFIRMATIVE
  21. ENFORCEMENT INCLUDES 2 OR MORE AGENCIES
  22. JUDGE LOOKS YOUNGER THAN YOUR PARENT
  23. SAME PIECE OF EVIDENCE IS QUOTED TWICE IN ONE SPEECH
  24. SOMEONE QUOTES A FORMER PRESIDENT
  25. SOMEONE STARTS A SPEECH WITH "JUDGE"
  26. PARTNER ACTUALLY BRINGS THAT EVIDENCE UP IN THEIR NEXT SPEECH
  27. HAS 3 HARMS OR MORE IN ONE SPEECH
  28. NEGATIVE ASKED FOR CREDENTIALS IN CROSS EX
  29. SOMEONE IS WEARING A BOW TIE
  30. NEGATIVE ARGUED 3 OR MORE STOCK ISSUES
  31. CROSS EXAMINER ASKS AFFIRMATIVE TO REPEAT MANDATE
  32. DEBATER BRINGS UP RULE FROM CCA GUIDELINES
  33. DEBATER HAS MORE THAN 3 BOOKS STACKED