conflict of interest advocacy justice boundaries social justice unfounded allegations ethics counsel confidentiality misconduct ethical resposibility social misbehavior ethics review board integrity midat harachamim fidelity diversity or inclusion order of censure retaliation self- reporting accountability boundaries social media stakeholders Dilemma Florence Nightingale greater than 50% implementation ethical violations intellectual honesty discrimination compassion adjudicatory process sensitivity review board conflict of interest advocacy justice boundaries social justice unfounded allegations ethics counsel confidentiality misconduct ethical resposibility social misbehavior ethics review board integrity midat harachamim fidelity diversity or inclusion order of censure retaliation self- reporting accountability boundaries social media stakeholders Dilemma Florence Nightingale greater than 50% implementation ethical violations intellectual honesty discrimination compassion adjudicatory process sensitivity review board
(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
G-conflict of interest
N-advocacy
O-justice
O-boundaries
G-social justice
N-unfounded allegations
O-ethics counsel
O-confidentiality
O-misconduct
N-ethical resposibility
B-social misbehavior
O-ethics review board
I-integrity
G-midat harachamim
I-fidelity
G-diversity or inclusion
I-order of censure
B-retaliation
B-self-reporting
I-accountability
G-boundaries
I-social media
I-stakeholders
G-Dilemma
B-Florence Nightingale
N-greater than 50%
G-implementation
O-ethical violations
I-intellectual honesty
B-discrimination
N-compassion
B-adjudicatory process
B-sensitivity
N-review board