(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
"Third page with different req. appears in conflu"
Proceeds to requests D at the last minute
"A was actually good but simplify it"
"I can't download the SVG" - cit dev to ux reg. UI files
deadline is for yesterday
"This screen has been descoped" but you learn it from a screenshot of a 1:1 chat in outlook after 4 weeks
"We need A (limited req., 10 nice to have)"
"We don't have time" - requests to revert to original ux design 5 months after handover
Requirements on conflu without requirements
"I find this confusing"
"seen at 16:10, 10 days ago"
"We don't need that edge case" 3 weeks before you are asked to design that edge case
"I don't know but I would like it like this" - cit not a stakeholder
"This is no longer for day 1"
"This is something we need to consider" - no signs of life for 3 weeks
"Scrap B, we need C" (but no req.)
"We don't like the complex feel" - excel like wireframes
Writes req. on conflu, leaves completely different comments on figma
"why did you make it like this, no one does this" - cit. dev to UX
UX gathers requirements - "Who told you this??"
"Ask zyx" - zyx sends to yzx.
"It's impossible to know it"
"I know you are UX but we don't like it" - cit. not a stakeholder
"We don't have info on this"
"Sorry what is this for?" cit operations during their new platform presentation
"Users won't understand if we don't do F" dev deem F impossible
"C is too complicated, we need to circle back"
No confluence requirements
"I know research found A but you know how research is"
"But why not do it this way" proceeds to suggest the exact same design from first review.
"This screen has been descoped"
yzx: "Ask xyz" - xyz doesn't know
"we need to circle back on this"
"No, we actually don't want this" after req. showed it for 3 months.
"We realised we don't have an API for this" (handover was 3 months ago)
"why are there two different req lists?"
"It's just different naming :)"
"What color is this supposed to be" - cit. dev to UX
"Who requested this?"
Business agrees but devs don't
"We would like it like excel"
"I can get someone to email you" sends a completely different topic
"Why are we in this call?"
"We'll do it in post- foundation" screen never to be heard of again
"We would like it but we don't know if it'll work"
"do you have an epic for this change" cit. dev on already agreed ux
"Scrap A, we need B"(unclear requirements)
"It would take too long to gather"
"I don't like it, I want it like my bank" - cit. not a stakeholder
