AuthorcredentialslistedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublicationScopeand limitsclearlystatedContradictsconsensuswith noevidencePeer-reviewedTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedbyreputableinstitutionNoauthorlistedOverlybroadclaimsData/evidencepresentedClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionalorsensationallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentObjective,neutrallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceSupportedwithcitationsPeerconsensuscitedBrokenlinks/noreferencesReputableinstitutionBiasedlanguageblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguagePublishedin last 5yearsAuthorcredentialslistedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublicationScopeand limitsclearlystatedContradictsconsensuswith noevidencePeer-reviewedTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedbyreputableinstitutionNoauthorlistedOverlybroadclaimsData/evidencepresentedClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionalorsensationallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentObjective,neutrallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceSupportedwithcitationsPeerconsensuscitedBrokenlinks/noreferencesReputableinstitutionBiasedlanguageblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguagePublishedin last 5years

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Author credentials listed
  2. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  3. Outdated publication
  4. Scope and limits clearly stated
  5. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  6. Peer-reviewed
  7. Transparent about methodology
  8. Published by reputable institution
  9. No author listed
  10. Overly broad claims
  11. Data/evidence presented
  12. Claims too broad without support
  13. Emotional or sensational language
  14. Commercial or sponsored content
  15. Objective, neutral language
  16. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  17. Supported with citations
  18. Peer consensus cited
  19. Broken links/no references
  20. Reputable institution
  21. Biased language
  22. blog as main reference
  23. Emotional language
  24. Published in last 5 years