Publishedin last 5yearsClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceNoauthorlistedSupportedwithcitationsScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedBrokenlinks/noreferencesOverlybroadclaimsCommercialorsponsoredcontentTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedbyreputableinstitutionEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublicationblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguageBiasedlanguageReputableinstitutionData/evidencepresentedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceObjective,neutrallanguagePeerconsensuscitedPublishedin last 5yearsClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceNoauthorlistedSupportedwithcitationsScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedBrokenlinks/noreferencesOverlybroadclaimsCommercialorsponsoredcontentTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedbyreputableinstitutionEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublicationblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguageBiasedlanguageReputableinstitutionData/evidencepresentedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceObjective,neutrallanguagePeerconsensuscited

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Published in last 5 years
  2. Claims too broad without support
  3. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  4. No author listed
  5. Supported with citations
  6. Scope and limits clearly stated
  7. Author credentials listed
  8. Broken links/no references
  9. Overly broad claims
  10. Commercial or sponsored content
  11. Transparent about methodology
  12. Published by reputable institution
  13. Emotional or sensational language
  14. Peer-reviewed
  15. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  16. Outdated publication
  17. blog as main reference
  18. Emotional language
  19. Biased language
  20. Reputable institution
  21. Data/evidence presented
  22. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  23. Objective, neutral language
  24. Peer consensus cited