Contradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentOutdatedpublicationSupportedwithcitationsReputableinstitutionPeerconsensuscitedTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedin last 5yearsblog asmainreferenceClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportObjective,neutrallanguagePeer-reviewedNoauthorlistedScopeand limitsclearlystatedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceBiasedlanguageEmotionalorsensationallanguageOverlybroadclaimsData/evidencepresentedAuthorcredentialslistedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceBrokenlinks/noreferencesPublishedbyreputableinstitutionContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentOutdatedpublicationSupportedwithcitationsReputableinstitutionPeerconsensuscitedTransparentaboutmethodologyPublishedin last 5yearsblog asmainreferenceClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportObjective,neutrallanguagePeer-reviewedNoauthorlistedScopeand limitsclearlystatedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceBiasedlanguageEmotionalorsensationallanguageOverlybroadclaimsData/evidencepresentedAuthorcredentialslistedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceBrokenlinks/noreferencesPublishedbyreputableinstitution

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  2. Emotional language
  3. Commercial or sponsored content
  4. Outdated publication
  5. Supported with citations
  6. Reputable institution
  7. Peer consensus cited
  8. Transparent about methodology
  9. Published in last 5 years
  10. blog as main reference
  11. Claims too broad without support
  12. Objective, neutral language
  13. Peer-reviewed
  14. No author listed
  15. Scope and limits clearly stated
  16. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  17. Biased language
  18. Emotional or sensational language
  19. Overly broad claims
  20. Data/evidence presented
  21. Author credentials listed
  22. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  23. Broken links/no references
  24. Published by reputable institution