BiasedlanguageContradictsconsensuswith noevidencePeerconsensuscitedNoauthorlistedData/evidencepresentedPeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceTransparentaboutmethodologyCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceEmotionalorsensationallanguageAuthorcredentialslistedOutdatedpublicationReputableinstitutionObjective,neutrallanguagePublishedin last 5yearsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportScopeand limitsclearlystatedOverlybroadclaimsEmotionallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentBrokenlinks/noreferencesblog asmainreferenceSupportedwithcitationsBiasedlanguageContradictsconsensuswith noevidencePeerconsensuscitedNoauthorlistedData/evidencepresentedPeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceTransparentaboutmethodologyCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceEmotionalorsensationallanguageAuthorcredentialslistedOutdatedpublicationReputableinstitutionObjective,neutrallanguagePublishedin last 5yearsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportScopeand limitsclearlystatedOverlybroadclaimsEmotionallanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentBrokenlinks/noreferencesblog asmainreferenceSupportedwithcitations

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Biased language
  2. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  3. Peer consensus cited
  4. No author listed
  5. Data/evidence presented
  6. Peer-reviewed
  7. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  8. Transparent about methodology
  9. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  10. Emotional or sensational language
  11. Author credentials listed
  12. Outdated publication
  13. Reputable institution
  14. Objective, neutral language
  15. Published in last 5 years
  16. Published by reputable institution
  17. Claims too broad without support
  18. Scope and limits clearly stated
  19. Overly broad claims
  20. Emotional language
  21. Commercial or sponsored content
  22. Broken links/no references
  23. blog as main reference
  24. Supported with citations