Contradictsconsensuswith noevidenceAuthorcredentialslistedEmotionallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceOutdatedpublicationObjective,neutrallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportPublishedbyreputableinstitutionScopeand limitsclearlystatedReputableinstitutionCommercialorsponsoredcontentPeer-reviewedOverlybroadclaimsEmotionalorsensationallanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesblog asmainreferenceCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceBiasedlanguageNoauthorlistedPeerconsensuscitedPublishedin last 5yearsSupportedwithcitationsTransparentaboutmethodologyData/evidencepresentedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceAuthorcredentialslistedEmotionallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceOutdatedpublicationObjective,neutrallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportPublishedbyreputableinstitutionScopeand limitsclearlystatedReputableinstitutionCommercialorsponsoredcontentPeer-reviewedOverlybroadclaimsEmotionalorsensationallanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesblog asmainreferenceCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceBiasedlanguageNoauthorlistedPeerconsensuscitedPublishedin last 5yearsSupportedwithcitationsTransparentaboutmethodologyData/evidencepresented

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  2. Author credentials listed
  3. Emotional language
  4. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  5. Outdated publication
  6. Objective, neutral language
  7. Claims too broad without support
  8. Published by reputable institution
  9. Scope and limits clearly stated
  10. Reputable institution
  11. Commercial or sponsored content
  12. Peer-reviewed
  13. Overly broad claims
  14. Emotional or sensational language
  15. Broken links/no references
  16. blog as main reference
  17. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  18. Biased language
  19. No author listed
  20. Peer consensus cited
  21. Published in last 5 years
  22. Supported with citations
  23. Transparent about methodology
  24. Data/evidence presented