ReputableinstitutionPublishedbyreputableinstitutionAuthorcredentialslistedData/evidencepresentedTransparentaboutmethodologySupportedwithcitationsPeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferencePublishedin last 5yearsBiasedlanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentBrokenlinks/noreferencesOutdatedpublicationObjective,neutrallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionalorsensationallanguageNoauthorlistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionallanguagePeerconsensuscitedScopeand limitsclearlystatedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOverlybroadclaimsReputableinstitutionPublishedbyreputableinstitutionAuthorcredentialslistedData/evidencepresentedTransparentaboutmethodologySupportedwithcitationsPeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferencePublishedin last 5yearsBiasedlanguageCommercialorsponsoredcontentBrokenlinks/noreferencesOutdatedpublicationObjective,neutrallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionalorsensationallanguageNoauthorlistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionallanguagePeerconsensuscitedScopeand limitsclearlystatedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOverlybroadclaims

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Reputable institution
  2. Published by reputable institution
  3. Author credentials listed
  4. Data/evidence presented
  5. Transparent about methodology
  6. Supported with citations
  7. Peer-reviewed
  8. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  9. blog as main reference
  10. Published in last 5 years
  11. Biased language
  12. Commercial or sponsored content
  13. Broken links/no references
  14. Outdated publication
  15. Objective, neutral language
  16. Claims too broad without support
  17. Emotional or sensational language
  18. No author listed
  19. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  20. Emotional language
  21. Peer consensus cited
  22. Scope and limits clearly stated
  23. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  24. Overly broad claims