Publishedin last 5yearsEmotionalorsensationallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguagePeer-reviewedBrokenlinks/noreferencesPeerconsensuscitedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentNoauthorlistedData/evidencepresentedOverlybroadclaimsContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceAuthorcredentialslistedTransparentaboutmethodologyObjective,neutrallanguageReputableinstitutionOutdatedpublicationBiasedlanguageSupportedwithcitationsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionScopeand limitsclearlystatedPublishedin last 5yearsEmotionalorsensationallanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferenceEmotionallanguagePeer-reviewedBrokenlinks/noreferencesPeerconsensuscitedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentNoauthorlistedData/evidencepresentedOverlybroadclaimsContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceAuthorcredentialslistedTransparentaboutmethodologyObjective,neutrallanguageReputableinstitutionOutdatedpublicationBiasedlanguageSupportedwithcitationsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionScopeand limitsclearlystated

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Published in last 5 years
  2. Emotional or sensational language
  3. Claims too broad without support
  4. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  5. blog as main reference
  6. Emotional language
  7. Peer-reviewed
  8. Broken links/no references
  9. Peer consensus cited
  10. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  11. Commercial or sponsored content
  12. No author listed
  13. Data/evidence presented
  14. Overly broad claims
  15. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  16. Author credentials listed
  17. Transparent about methodology
  18. Objective, neutral language
  19. Reputable institution
  20. Outdated publication
  21. Biased language
  22. Supported with citations
  23. Published by reputable institution
  24. Scope and limits clearly stated