Scopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedCommercialorsponsoredcontentSupportedwithcitationsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidencePeerconsensuscitedData/evidencepresentedNoauthorlistedReputableinstitutionOverlybroadclaimsblog asmainreferenceTransparentaboutmethodologyBrokenlinks/noreferencesEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionallanguageObjective,neutrallanguageBiasedlanguageCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublicationScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedCommercialorsponsoredcontentSupportedwithcitationsPublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidencePeerconsensuscitedData/evidencepresentedNoauthorlistedReputableinstitutionOverlybroadclaimsblog asmainreferenceTransparentaboutmethodologyBrokenlinks/noreferencesEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportEmotionallanguageObjective,neutrallanguageBiasedlanguageCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOutdatedpublication

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Scope and limits clearly stated
  2. Author credentials listed
  3. Commercial or sponsored content
  4. Supported with citations
  5. Published by reputable institution
  6. Published in last 5 years
  7. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  8. Peer consensus cited
  9. Data/evidence presented
  10. No author listed
  11. Reputable institution
  12. Overly broad claims
  13. blog as main reference
  14. Transparent about methodology
  15. Broken links/no references
  16. Emotional or sensational language
  17. Peer-reviewed
  18. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  19. Claims too broad without support
  20. Emotional language
  21. Objective, neutral language
  22. Biased language
  23. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  24. Outdated publication