PublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsReputableinstitutionBiasedlanguageOutdatedpublicationCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOverlybroadclaimsScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedPeerconsensuscitedEmotionallanguageTransparentaboutmethodologyCommercialorsponsoredcontentblog asmainreferenceData/evidencepresentedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionalorsensationallanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesSupportedwithcitationsClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportNoauthorlistedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidencePeer-reviewedObjective,neutrallanguagePublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsReputableinstitutionBiasedlanguageOutdatedpublicationCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceOverlybroadclaimsScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedPeerconsensuscitedEmotionallanguageTransparentaboutmethodologyCommercialorsponsoredcontentblog asmainreferenceData/evidencepresentedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionalorsensationallanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesSupportedwithcitationsClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportNoauthorlistedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidencePeer-reviewedObjective,neutrallanguage

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Published by reputable institution
  2. Published in last 5 years
  3. Reputable institution
  4. Biased language
  5. Outdated publication
  6. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  7. Overly broad claims
  8. Scope and limits clearly stated
  9. Author credentials listed
  10. Peer consensus cited
  11. Emotional language
  12. Transparent about methodology
  13. Commercial or sponsored content
  14. blog as main reference
  15. Data/evidence presented
  16. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  17. Emotional or sensational language
  18. Broken links/no references
  19. Supported with citations
  20. Claims too broad without support
  21. No author listed
  22. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  23. Peer-reviewed
  24. Objective, neutral language