Claimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceData/evidencepresentedSupportedwithcitationsBiasedlanguageEmotionallanguageOverlybroadclaimsPeerconsensuscitedReputableinstitutionblog asmainreferenceObjective,neutrallanguageCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentPeer-reviewedTransparentaboutmethodologyBrokenlinks/noreferencesPublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsScopeand limitsclearlystatedNoauthorlistedEmotionalorsensationallanguageAuthorcredentialslistedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceOutdatedpublicationClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceData/evidencepresentedSupportedwithcitationsBiasedlanguageEmotionallanguageOverlybroadclaimsPeerconsensuscitedReputableinstitutionblog asmainreferenceObjective,neutrallanguageCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentPeer-reviewedTransparentaboutmethodologyBrokenlinks/noreferencesPublishedbyreputableinstitutionPublishedin last 5yearsScopeand limitsclearlystatedNoauthorlistedEmotionalorsensationallanguageAuthorcredentialslistedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceOutdatedpublication

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Claims too broad without support
  2. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  3. Data/evidence presented
  4. Supported with citations
  5. Biased language
  6. Emotional language
  7. Overly broad claims
  8. Peer consensus cited
  9. Reputable institution
  10. blog as main reference
  11. Objective, neutral language
  12. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  13. Commercial or sponsored content
  14. Peer-reviewed
  15. Transparent about methodology
  16. Broken links/no references
  17. Published by reputable institution
  18. Published in last 5 years
  19. Scope and limits clearly stated
  20. No author listed
  21. Emotional or sensational language
  22. Author credentials listed
  23. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  24. Outdated publication