EmotionallanguagePublishedbyreputableinstitutionPeerconsensuscitedOutdatedpublicationTransparentaboutmethodologyOverlybroadclaimsObjective,neutrallanguageSupportedwithcitationsBiasedlanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesScopeand limitsclearlystatedEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceData/evidencepresentedAuthorcredentialslistedClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportblog asmainreferencePublishedin last 5yearsCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentReputableinstitutionNoauthorlistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceEmotionallanguagePublishedbyreputableinstitutionPeerconsensuscitedOutdatedpublicationTransparentaboutmethodologyOverlybroadclaimsObjective,neutrallanguageSupportedwithcitationsBiasedlanguageBrokenlinks/noreferencesScopeand limitsclearlystatedEmotionalorsensationallanguagePeer-reviewedContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceData/evidencepresentedAuthorcredentialslistedClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportblog asmainreferencePublishedin last 5yearsCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceCommercialorsponsoredcontentReputableinstitutionNoauthorlistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidence

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Emotional language
  2. Published by reputable institution
  3. Peer consensus cited
  4. Outdated publication
  5. Transparent about methodology
  6. Overly broad claims
  7. Objective, neutral language
  8. Supported with citations
  9. Biased language
  10. Broken links/no references
  11. Scope and limits clearly stated
  12. Emotional or sensational language
  13. Peer-reviewed
  14. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  15. Data/evidence presented
  16. Author credentials listed
  17. Claims too broad without support
  18. blog as main reference
  19. Published in last 5 years
  20. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  21. Commercial or sponsored content
  22. Reputable institution
  23. No author listed
  24. Contradicts consensus with no evidence