Brokenlinks/noreferencesPeer-reviewedNoauthorlistedOverlybroadclaimsReputableinstitutionEmotionallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferenceEmotionalorsensationallanguageSupportedwithcitationsObjective,neutrallanguageOutdatedpublicationPublishedin last 5yearsCommercialorsponsoredcontentData/evidencepresentedPeerconsensuscitedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceBiasedlanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportPublishedbyreputableinstitutionTransparentaboutmethodologyBrokenlinks/noreferencesPeer-reviewedNoauthorlistedOverlybroadclaimsReputableinstitutionEmotionallanguageContradictsexpertconsensuswithoutevidenceblog asmainreferenceEmotionalorsensationallanguageSupportedwithcitationsObjective,neutrallanguageOutdatedpublicationPublishedin last 5yearsCommercialorsponsoredcontentData/evidencepresentedPeerconsensuscitedCitesWikipedia/blogas mainsourceScopeand limitsclearlystatedAuthorcredentialslistedContradictsconsensuswith noevidenceBiasedlanguageClaimstoo broadwithoutsupportPublishedbyreputableinstitutionTransparentaboutmethodology

Credibility Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Broken links/no references
  2. Peer-reviewed
  3. No author listed
  4. Overly broad claims
  5. Reputable institution
  6. Emotional language
  7. Contradicts expert consensus without evidence
  8. blog as main reference
  9. Emotional or sensational language
  10. Supported with citations
  11. Objective, neutral language
  12. Outdated publication
  13. Published in last 5 years
  14. Commercial or sponsored content
  15. Data/evidence presented
  16. Peer consensus cited
  17. Cites Wikipedia/blog as main source
  18. Scope and limits clearly stated
  19. Author credentials listed
  20. Contradicts consensus with no evidence
  21. Biased language
  22. Claims too broad without support
  23. Published by reputable institution
  24. Transparent about methodology