VPNsshouldalways belegal.AI moderationshould replacehuman freespeechdecisions.Onlineanonymityshould beprotected atall costs.t’s ethical tohack adictator’sgovernmentwebsite.Censorship isacceptable if itpreventsviolence, even ifit silences validpolitical voices.AI moderationshould replacehuman freespeechdecisions.Tech firmsshould walkaway frommarkets thatdemandcensorship.Freedom ofspeech shouldnot apply onlinethe same way itdoes offline.Anonymousspeech onlineis as dangerousas unregulatedweapons.”Real names onthe internetwould reducehate speechbut kill activism.Nationalsecurity shouldalwaysoutweigh thepublic’s right toknow.Streamingservices shouldsubsidizeinfrastructuresince they hogbandwidth.Tech companiesare morepowerful thangovernments.And that’sdangerous.Platforms thatdon’t removeharmful speechshould be heldlegallyresponsible.Companiesshould followlocal lawseven if they’reunjust.Future wars willbe won bywhoever controlsthe internet. Socensorship isself-defense.Internetshutdownsduring protestsare justified ifthey preventviolence.Facebook/Googleshould beconsideredutilities, notprivatecompanies.Social mediashould pre-approvepolitical contentbefore it’sposted.ISPs should befree to chargemore for heavyusers likeNetflix andgamers.If a whistleblowermakes thecountry look badinternationally,they should loseprotection.If tech companieswant globalmarkets, theyshould acceptthat ethics comesecond to profits.Net neutralityisn’tnecessary ifthere’s marketcompetition.Blockingmisinformationis moreimportant thanprotecting freespeech.The internetshould betreated as ahuman right.VPNsshouldalways belegal.AI moderationshould replacehuman freespeechdecisions.Onlineanonymityshould beprotected atall costs.t’s ethical tohack adictator’sgovernmentwebsite.Censorship isacceptable if itpreventsviolence, even ifit silences validpolitical voices.AI moderationshould replacehuman freespeechdecisions.Tech firmsshould walkaway frommarkets thatdemandcensorship.Freedom ofspeech shouldnot apply onlinethe same way itdoes offline.Anonymousspeech onlineis as dangerousas unregulatedweapons.”Real names onthe internetwould reducehate speechbut kill activism.Nationalsecurity shouldalwaysoutweigh thepublic’s right toknow.Streamingservices shouldsubsidizeinfrastructuresince they hogbandwidth.Tech companiesare morepowerful thangovernments.And that’sdangerous.Platforms thatdon’t removeharmful speechshould be heldlegallyresponsible.Companiesshould followlocal lawseven if they’reunjust.Future wars willbe won bywhoever controlsthe internet. Socensorship isself-defense.Internetshutdownsduring protestsare justified ifthey preventviolence.Facebook/Googleshould beconsideredutilities, notprivatecompanies.Social mediashould pre-approvepolitical contentbefore it’sposted.ISPs should befree to chargemore for heavyusers likeNetflix andgamers.If a whistleblowermakes thecountry look badinternationally,they should loseprotection.If tech companieswant globalmarkets, theyshould acceptthat ethics comesecond to profits.Net neutralityisn’tnecessary ifthere’s marketcompetition.Blockingmisinformationis moreimportant thanprotecting freespeech.The internetshould betreated as ahuman right.

Freedom Of Speech Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
  1. VPNs should always be legal.
  2. AI moderation should replace human free speech decisions.
  3. Online anonymity should be protected at all costs.
  4. t’s ethical to hack a dictator’s government website.
  5. Censorship is acceptable if it prevents violence, even if it silences valid political voices.
  6. AI moderation should replace human free speech decisions.
  7. Tech firms should walk away from markets that demand censorship.
  8. Freedom of speech should not apply online the same way it does offline.
  9. Anonymous speech online is as dangerous as unregulated weapons.”
  10. Real names on the internet would reduce hate speech but kill activism.
  11. National security should always outweigh the public’s right to know.
  12. Streaming services should subsidize infrastructure since they hog bandwidth.
  13. Tech companies are more powerful than governments. And that’s dangerous.
  14. Platforms that don’t remove harmful speech should be held legally responsible.
  15. Companies should follow local laws even if they’re unjust.
  16. Future wars will be won by whoever controls the internet. So censorship is self-defense.
  17. Internet shutdowns during protests are justified if they prevent violence.
  18. Facebook/Google should be considered utilities, not private companies.
  19. Social media should pre-approve political content before it’s posted.
  20. ISPs should be free to charge more for heavy users like Netflix and gamers.
  21. If a whistleblower makes the country look bad internationally, they should lose protection.
  22. If tech companies want global markets, they should accept that ethics come second to profits.
  23. Net neutrality isn’t necessary if there’s market competition.
  24. Blocking misinformation is more important than protecting free speech.
  25. The internet should be treated as a human right.