LowsamplesizeScientologySkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)MeasurementbiasHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)Sample notapplicableto generalpopulationConclusionnotsupportedby the data"toattractfemales"Notaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)WeirddiagramConfirmationbiasNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestCitingthemselvesImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)RedditthreadcitedWeirdlywell-writtenabstractDid not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountPseudosciencep-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Jumping toconclusionsAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicRandomfanfictionsomehowTangent inthe middleof thepaperCitinganythingfrom beforethe year2000LowsamplesizeScientologySkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)MeasurementbiasHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)Sample notapplicableto generalpopulationConclusionnotsupportedby the data"toattractfemales"Notaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)WeirddiagramConfirmationbiasNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestCitingthemselvesImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)RedditthreadcitedWeirdlywell-writtenabstractDid not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountPseudosciencep-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Jumping toconclusionsAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicRandomfanfictionsomehowTangent inthe middleof thepaperCitinganythingfrom beforethe year2000

Scuffed science - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Low sample size
  2. Scientology
  3. Skibidi toilet mention during stream (idk i ran out of ideas)
  4. Measurement bias
  5. Hawthorne effect (free if non applicable)
  6. Sample not applicable to general population
  7. Conclusion not supported by the data
  8. "to attract females"
  9. Not addressing outliers (free if non applicable)
  10. Weird diagram
  11. Confirmation bias
  12. Not (or improperly) stating conflict of interest
  13. Citing themselves
  14. Improper control (or similar if non applicable)
  15. Reddit thread cited
  16. Weirdly well-written abstract
  17. Did not take confounding, nor effect modification into account
  18. Pseudoscience
  19. p-value insanely high (and not addressing it)
  20. Jumping to conclusions
  21. Author has nothing to do with the topic
  22. Random fanfiction somehow
  23. Tangent in the middle of the paper
  24. Citing anything from before the year 2000