PseudoscienceMeasurementbias"toattractfemales"RedditthreadcitedHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)Citinganythingfrom beforethe year2000Did not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountConfirmationbiasCitingthemselvesScientologyJumping toconclusionsSample notapplicableto generalpopulationConclusionnotsupportedby the dataNotaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)WeirddiagramWeirdlywell-writtenabstractLowsamplesizeSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)Impropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)Randomfanfictionsomehowp-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Not (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestTangent inthe middleof thepaperAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicPseudoscienceMeasurementbias"toattractfemales"RedditthreadcitedHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)Citinganythingfrom beforethe year2000Did not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountConfirmationbiasCitingthemselvesScientologyJumping toconclusionsSample notapplicableto generalpopulationConclusionnotsupportedby the dataNotaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)WeirddiagramWeirdlywell-writtenabstractLowsamplesizeSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)Impropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)Randomfanfictionsomehowp-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Not (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestTangent inthe middleof thepaperAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopic

Scuffed science - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Pseudoscience
  2. Measurement bias
  3. "to attract females"
  4. Reddit thread cited
  5. Hawthorne effect (free if non applicable)
  6. Citing anything from before the year 2000
  7. Did not take confounding, nor effect modification into account
  8. Confirmation bias
  9. Citing themselves
  10. Scientology
  11. Jumping to conclusions
  12. Sample not applicable to general population
  13. Conclusion not supported by the data
  14. Not addressing outliers (free if non applicable)
  15. Weird diagram
  16. Weirdly well-written abstract
  17. Low sample size
  18. Skibidi toilet mention during stream (idk i ran out of ideas)
  19. Improper control (or similar if non applicable)
  20. Random fanfiction somehow
  21. p-value insanely high (and not addressing it)
  22. Not (or improperly) stating conflict of interest
  23. Tangent in the middle of the paper
  24. Author has nothing to do with the topic