Did not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountPseudoscienceSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)ConfirmationbiasWeirdlywell-writtenabstractJumping toconclusionsAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicTangent inthe middleof thepaperRedditthreadcitedSample notapplicableto generalpopulationNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestRandomfanfictionsomehowConclusionnotsupportedby the dataLowsamplesize"toattractfemales"WeirddiagramCitinganythingfrom beforethe year2000MeasurementbiasScientologyImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)p-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Notaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)Hawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)CitingthemselvesDid not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto accountPseudoscienceSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)ConfirmationbiasWeirdlywell-writtenabstractJumping toconclusionsAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicTangent inthe middleof thepaperRedditthreadcitedSample notapplicableto generalpopulationNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestRandomfanfictionsomehowConclusionnotsupportedby the dataLowsamplesize"toattractfemales"WeirddiagramCitinganythingfrom beforethe year2000MeasurementbiasScientologyImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)p-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Notaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)Hawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)Citingthemselves

Scuffed science - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Did not take confounding, nor effect modification into account
  2. Pseudoscience
  3. Skibidi toilet mention during stream (idk i ran out of ideas)
  4. Confirmation bias
  5. Weirdly well-written abstract
  6. Jumping to conclusions
  7. Author has nothing to do with the topic
  8. Tangent in the middle of the paper
  9. Reddit thread cited
  10. Sample not applicable to general population
  11. Not (or improperly) stating conflict of interest
  12. Random fanfiction somehow
  13. Conclusion not supported by the data
  14. Low sample size
  15. "to attract females"
  16. Weird diagram
  17. Citing anything from before the year 2000
  18. Measurement bias
  19. Scientology
  20. Improper control (or similar if non applicable)
  21. p-value insanely high (and not addressing it)
  22. Not addressing outliers (free if non applicable)
  23. Hawthorne effect (free if non applicable)
  24. Citing themselves