ScientologyRandomfanfictionsomehowConclusionnotsupportedby the dataWeirddiagramSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)p-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Citinganythingfrom beforethe year2000Weirdlywell-writtenabstractImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)Did not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto account"toattractfemales"MeasurementbiasNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestLowsamplesizePseudoscienceConfirmationbiasSample notapplicableto generalpopulationAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicNotaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)Jumping toconclusionsTangent inthe middleof thepaperHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)CitingthemselvesRedditthreadcitedScientologyRandomfanfictionsomehowConclusionnotsupportedby the dataWeirddiagramSkibidi toiletmentionduring stream(idk i ran outof ideas)p-valueinsanely high(and notaddressingit)Citinganythingfrom beforethe year2000Weirdlywell-writtenabstractImpropercontrol (orsimilar if nonapplicable)Did not takeconfounding,nor effectmodificationinto account"toattractfemales"MeasurementbiasNot (orimproperly)statingconflict ofinterestLowsamplesizePseudoscienceConfirmationbiasSample notapplicableto generalpopulationAuthor hasnothing todo with thetopicNotaddressingoutliers (freeif nonapplicable)Jumping toconclusionsTangent inthe middleof thepaperHawthorneeffect (freeif nonapplicable)CitingthemselvesRedditthreadcited

Scuffed science - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  1. Scientology
  2. Random fanfiction somehow
  3. Conclusion not supported by the data
  4. Weird diagram
  5. Skibidi toilet mention during stream (idk i ran out of ideas)
  6. p-value insanely high (and not addressing it)
  7. Citing anything from before the year 2000
  8. Weirdly well-written abstract
  9. Improper control (or similar if non applicable)
  10. Did not take confounding, nor effect modification into account
  11. "to attract females"
  12. Measurement bias
  13. Not (or improperly) stating conflict of interest
  14. Low sample size
  15. Pseudoscience
  16. Confirmation bias
  17. Sample not applicable to general population
  18. Author has nothing to do with the topic
  19. Not addressing outliers (free if non applicable)
  20. Jumping to conclusions
  21. Tangent in the middle of the paper
  22. Hawthorne effect (free if non applicable)
  23. Citing themselves
  24. Reddit thread cited