NocriticismallowedMadefortheatrics"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."Jumping toconclusions"Solve"OverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaMajority ofcommentsectionagreesBite of83/87Forgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyTalksdown toviewers inany wayAlreadybeencoveredPaddingvideoruntimeWilliamAftonDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withCherrypickingScottCawthonBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailDavidCassidyEvidenceproblemsOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedUsessomethingfrom filesVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousCryingChildStretchedor forcedconnectionsGoldenFreddyActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingMinordetailsbecomeimportantUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesTheMimicHead-canonNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOver-justificationof theirtheoryTakesforever toget to apointBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)"Ithink/don'tthink"Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreConfusessymbolismwith realityRemnantor AgonyMis-interpretationsof some kindOverlylongvideoNocriticismallowedMadefortheatrics"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."Jumping toconclusions"Solve"OverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaMajority ofcommentsectionagreesBite of83/87Forgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyTalksdown toviewers inany wayAlreadybeencoveredPaddingvideoruntimeWilliamAftonDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withCherrypickingScottCawthonBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailDavidCassidyEvidenceproblemsOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedUsessomethingfrom filesVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousCryingChildStretchedor forcedconnectionsGoldenFreddyActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingMinordetailsbecomeimportantUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesTheMimicHead-canonNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOver-justificationof theirtheoryTakesforever toget to apointBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)"Ithink/don'tthink"Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreConfusessymbolismwith realityRemnantor AgonyMis-interpretationsof some kindOverlylongvideo

FNAF Theory Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
  1. No criticism allowed
  2. Made for theatrics
  3. "You keep using [COMPELLING], I do not think it means what you think it means."
  4. Jumping to conclusions
  5. "Solve"
  6. Overhyping FNAF lore like no tomorrow
  7. Uses past information for present lore & vice-versa
  8. Majority of comment section agrees
  9. Bite of 83/87
  10. Forgets or doesn't know Scott is making up the story
  11. Talks down to viewers in any way
  12. Already been covered
  13. Padding video runtime
  14. William Afton
  15. Doesn't acknowledge the nonsense they're working with
  16. Cherry picking
  17. Scott Cawthon
  18. Borderline clickbait title and/or thumbnail
  19. David
  20. Cassidy
  21. Evidence problems
  22. Over- reliance on pre-existing theories
  23. Adds little or nothing to the overarching story
  24. Breaks apart the story instead of telling it
  25. Comparison to something completely unrelated
  26. Uses something from files
  27. Video gets progressively more ridiculous
  28. Crying Child
  29. Stretched or forced connections
  30. Golden Freddy
  31. Acts like their theory isn't polarizing
  32. Minor details become important
  33. Unintentional overlap with other theories
  34. The Mimic
  35. Head-canon
  36. No concept of Occam's Razor
  37. Lying with confidence and good editing
  38. Over-justification of their theory
  39. Takes forever to get to a point
  40. Books mentioned (Bonus if there's entire excerpts!)
  41. "I think/don't think"
  42. Brings up characters that should be gone
  43. Goes against the theme of the story
  44. Acts like an arbiter of FNAF lore
  45. Confuses symbolism with reality
  46. Remnant or Agony
  47. Mis-interpretations of some kind
  48. Overly long video