Comparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedDavidMadefortheatricsRemnantor AgonyOver-reliance onpre-existingtheories"Ithink/don'tthink"Mis-interpretationsof some kindBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)Head-canon"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."MinordetailsbecomeimportantDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyCherrypickingOverlylongvideoBite of83/87Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneAlreadybeencoveredUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesPaddingvideoruntimeUsessomethingfrom filesUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryTalksdown toviewers inany wayGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyCassidyNocriticismallowedWilliamAftonTheMimicEvidenceproblemsLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowOver-justificationof theirtheoryGoldenFreddyConfusessymbolismwith realityActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingJumping toconclusionsNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousCryingChildStretchedor forcedconnectionsTakesforever toget to apointScottCawthonMajority ofcommentsectionagrees"Solve"Comparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedDavidMadefortheatricsRemnantor AgonyOver-reliance onpre-existingtheories"Ithink/don'tthink"Mis-interpretationsof some kindBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)Head-canon"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."MinordetailsbecomeimportantDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyCherrypickingOverlylongvideoBite of83/87Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneAlreadybeencoveredUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesPaddingvideoruntimeUsessomethingfrom filesUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryTalksdown toviewers inany wayGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyCassidyNocriticismallowedWilliamAftonTheMimicEvidenceproblemsLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowOver-justificationof theirtheoryGoldenFreddyConfusessymbolismwith realityActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingJumping toconclusionsNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousCryingChildStretchedor forcedconnectionsTakesforever toget to apointScottCawthonMajority ofcommentsectionagrees"Solve"

FNAF Theory Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
  1. Comparison to something completely unrelated
  2. David
  3. Made for theatrics
  4. Remnant or Agony
  5. Over- reliance on pre-existing theories
  6. "I think/don't think"
  7. Mis-interpretations of some kind
  8. Borderline clickbait title and/or thumbnail
  9. Acts like an arbiter of FNAF lore
  10. Books mentioned (Bonus if there's entire excerpts!)
  11. Head-canon
  12. "You keep using [COMPELLING], I do not think it means what you think it means."
  13. Minor details become important
  14. Doesn't acknowledge the nonsense they're working with
  15. Forgets or doesn't know Scott is making up the story
  16. Cherry picking
  17. Overly long video
  18. Bite of 83/87
  19. Brings up characters that should be gone
  20. Already been covered
  21. Unintentional overlap with other theories
  22. Padding video runtime
  23. Uses something from files
  24. Uses past information for present lore & vice-versa
  25. Breaks apart the story instead of telling it
  26. Adds little or nothing to the overarching story
  27. Talks down to viewers in any way
  28. Goes against the theme of the story
  29. Cassidy
  30. No criticism allowed
  31. William Afton
  32. The Mimic
  33. Evidence problems
  34. Lying with confidence and good editing
  35. Overhyping FNAF lore like no tomorrow
  36. Over-justification of their theory
  37. Golden Freddy
  38. Confuses symbolism with reality
  39. Acts like their theory isn't polarizing
  40. Jumping to conclusions
  41. No concept of Occam's Razor
  42. Video gets progressively more ridiculous
  43. Crying Child
  44. Stretched or forced connections
  45. Takes forever to get to a point
  46. Scott Cawthon
  47. Majority of comment section agrees
  48. "Solve"