Video getsprogressivelymoreridiculousTakesforever toget to apointMinordetailsbecomeimportantMis-interpretationsof some kindTheMimicOverlylongvideoWilliamAftonMadefortheatricsCryingChild"Ithink/don'tthink"PaddingvideoruntimeNocriticismallowedStretchedor forcedconnectionsBrings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailBite of83/87Acts likean arbiterof FNAFloreMajority ofcommentsectionagreesOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyGoesagainst thetheme ofthe story"Solve"Breaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itUsessomethingfrom filesOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingConfusessymbolismwith realityCherrypickingDavidRemnantor AgonyAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryLying withconfidenceand goodeditingUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaAlreadybeencoveredEvidenceproblemsUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesGoldenFreddyOver-justificationof theirtheoryScottCawthonCassidyComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedJumping toconclusionsTalksdown toviewers inany wayBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)Head-canonNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking with"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."Video getsprogressivelymoreridiculousTakesforever toget to apointMinordetailsbecomeimportantMis-interpretationsof some kindTheMimicOverlylongvideoWilliamAftonMadefortheatricsCryingChild"Ithink/don'tthink"PaddingvideoruntimeNocriticismallowedStretchedor forcedconnectionsBrings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailBite of83/87Acts likean arbiterof FNAFloreMajority ofcommentsectionagreesOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyGoesagainst thetheme ofthe story"Solve"Breaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itUsessomethingfrom filesOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingConfusessymbolismwith realityCherrypickingDavidRemnantor AgonyAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryLying withconfidenceand goodeditingUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaAlreadybeencoveredEvidenceproblemsUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesGoldenFreddyOver-justificationof theirtheoryScottCawthonCassidyComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedJumping toconclusionsTalksdown toviewers inany wayBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)Head-canonNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking with"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."

FNAF Theory Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
  1. Video gets progressively more ridiculous
  2. Takes forever to get to a point
  3. Minor details become important
  4. Mis-interpretations of some kind
  5. The Mimic
  6. Overly long video
  7. William Afton
  8. Made for theatrics
  9. Crying Child
  10. "I think/don't think"
  11. Padding video runtime
  12. No criticism allowed
  13. Stretched or forced connections
  14. Brings up characters that should be gone
  15. Borderline clickbait title and/or thumbnail
  16. Bite of 83/87
  17. Acts like an arbiter of FNAF lore
  18. Majority of comment section agrees
  19. Overhyping FNAF lore like no tomorrow
  20. Forgets or doesn't know Scott is making up the story
  21. Goes against the theme of the story
  22. "Solve"
  23. Breaks apart the story instead of telling it
  24. Uses something from files
  25. Over- reliance on pre-existing theories
  26. Acts like their theory isn't polarizing
  27. Confuses symbolism with reality
  28. Cherry picking
  29. David
  30. Remnant or Agony
  31. Adds little or nothing to the overarching story
  32. Lying with confidence and good editing
  33. Uses past information for present lore & vice-versa
  34. Already been covered
  35. Evidence problems
  36. Unintentional overlap with other theories
  37. Golden Freddy
  38. Over-justification of their theory
  39. Scott Cawthon
  40. Cassidy
  41. Comparison to something completely unrelated
  42. Jumping to conclusions
  43. Talks down to viewers in any way
  44. Books mentioned (Bonus if there's entire excerpts!)
  45. Head-canon
  46. No concept of Occam's Razor
  47. Doesn't acknowledge the nonsense they're working with
  48. "You keep using [COMPELLING], I do not think it means what you think it means."