NocriticismallowedBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailPaddingvideoruntimeHead-canonCherrypickingConfusessymbolismwith realityEvidenceproblemsAlreadybeencoveredForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedJumping toconclusionsRemnantor AgonyMinordetailsbecomeimportantActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreMis-interpretationsof some kindScottCawthonTakesforever toget to apointUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)TheMimicOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowCryingChildGoldenFreddyAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstory"Solve"Lying withconfidenceand goodeditingGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyBite of83/87Majority ofcommentsectionagreesWilliamAftonUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaMadefortheatrics"Ithink/don'tthink"Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneStretchedor forcedconnectionsTalksdown toviewers inany wayDavidOver-reliance onpre-existingtheories"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."OverlylongvideoCassidyUsessomethingfrom filesVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousOver-justificationof theirtheoryNocriticismallowedBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailPaddingvideoruntimeHead-canonCherrypickingConfusessymbolismwith realityEvidenceproblemsAlreadybeencoveredForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingComparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelatedJumping toconclusionsRemnantor AgonyMinordetailsbecomeimportantActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreMis-interpretationsof some kindScottCawthonTakesforever toget to apointUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)TheMimicOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowCryingChildGoldenFreddyAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstory"Solve"Lying withconfidenceand goodeditingGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyBite of83/87Majority ofcommentsectionagreesWilliamAftonUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaMadefortheatrics"Ithink/don'tthink"Brings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneStretchedor forcedconnectionsTalksdown toviewers inany wayDavidOver-reliance onpre-existingtheories"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."OverlylongvideoCassidyUsessomethingfrom filesVideo getsprogressivelymoreridiculousOver-justificationof theirtheory

FNAF Theory Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
  1. No criticism allowed
  2. Breaks apart the story instead of telling it
  3. Borderline clickbait title and/or thumbnail
  4. Padding video runtime
  5. Head-canon
  6. Cherry picking
  7. Confuses symbolism with reality
  8. Evidence problems
  9. Already been covered
  10. Forgets or doesn't know Scott is making up the story
  11. Acts like their theory isn't polarizing
  12. Comparison to something completely unrelated
  13. Jumping to conclusions
  14. Remnant or Agony
  15. Minor details become important
  16. Acts like an arbiter of FNAF lore
  17. Mis-interpretations of some kind
  18. Scott Cawthon
  19. Takes forever to get to a point
  20. Unintentional overlap with other theories
  21. No concept of Occam's Razor
  22. Doesn't acknowledge the nonsense they're working with
  23. Books mentioned (Bonus if there's entire excerpts!)
  24. The Mimic
  25. Overhyping FNAF lore like no tomorrow
  26. Crying Child
  27. Golden Freddy
  28. Adds little or nothing to the overarching story
  29. "Solve"
  30. Lying with confidence and good editing
  31. Goes against the theme of the story
  32. Bite of 83/87
  33. Majority of comment section agrees
  34. William Afton
  35. Uses past information for present lore & vice-versa
  36. Made for theatrics
  37. "I think/don't think"
  38. Brings up characters that should be gone
  39. Stretched or forced connections
  40. Talks down to viewers in any way
  41. David
  42. Over- reliance on pre-existing theories
  43. "You keep using [COMPELLING], I do not think it means what you think it means."
  44. Overly long video
  45. Cassidy
  46. Uses something from files
  47. Video gets progressively more ridiculous
  48. Over-justification of their theory