MinordetailsbecomeimportantUsessomethingfrom filesBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itBrings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryTalksdown toviewers inany wayLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOver-justificationof theirtheoryPaddingvideoruntime"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."Comparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelated"Solve"ScottCawthonTakesforever toget to apointNocriticismallowedOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowOverlylongvideoCherrypickingEvidenceproblemsGoldenFreddyStretchedor forcedconnectionsGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyMadefortheatricsJumping toconclusionsMis-interpretationsof some kindAlreadybeencovered"Ithink/don'tthink"Video getsprogressivelymoreridiculousNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorTheMimicCassidyOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesRemnantor AgonyUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaConfusessymbolismwith realityUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesMajority ofcommentsectionagreesHead-canonWilliamAftonBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)CryingChildBite of83/87DavidMinordetailsbecomeimportantUsessomethingfrom filesBorderlineclickbaittitle and/orthumbnailBreaks apartthe storyinstead oftelling itBrings upcharactersthat shouldbe goneActs likean arbiterof FNAFloreAdds little ornothing totheoverarchingstoryTalksdown toviewers inany wayLying withconfidenceand goodeditingOver-justificationof theirtheoryPaddingvideoruntime"You keep using[COMPELLING],I do not think itmeans what youthink it means."Comparisonto somethingcompletelyunrelated"Solve"ScottCawthonTakesforever toget to apointNocriticismallowedOverhypingFNAF lorelike notomorrowOverlylongvideoCherrypickingEvidenceproblemsGoldenFreddyStretchedor forcedconnectionsGoesagainst thetheme ofthe storyDoesn'tacknowledgethe nonsensethey'reworking withActs liketheirtheory isn'tpolarizingForgets ordoesn't knowScott ismaking upthe storyMadefortheatricsJumping toconclusionsMis-interpretationsof some kindAlreadybeencovered"Ithink/don'tthink"Video getsprogressivelymoreridiculousNoconcept ofOccam'sRazorTheMimicCassidyOver-reliance onpre-existingtheoriesRemnantor AgonyUses pastinformationfor presentlore & vice-versaConfusessymbolismwith realityUnintentionaloverlap withothertheoriesMajority ofcommentsectionagreesHead-canonWilliamAftonBooksmentioned(Bonus ifthere's entireexcerpts!)CryingChildBite of83/87David

FNAF Theory Bingo - Call List

(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
  1. Minor details become important
  2. Uses something from files
  3. Borderline clickbait title and/or thumbnail
  4. Breaks apart the story instead of telling it
  5. Brings up characters that should be gone
  6. Acts like an arbiter of FNAF lore
  7. Adds little or nothing to the overarching story
  8. Talks down to viewers in any way
  9. Lying with confidence and good editing
  10. Over-justification of their theory
  11. Padding video runtime
  12. "You keep using [COMPELLING], I do not think it means what you think it means."
  13. Comparison to something completely unrelated
  14. "Solve"
  15. Scott Cawthon
  16. Takes forever to get to a point
  17. No criticism allowed
  18. Overhyping FNAF lore like no tomorrow
  19. Overly long video
  20. Cherry picking
  21. Evidence problems
  22. Golden Freddy
  23. Stretched or forced connections
  24. Goes against the theme of the story
  25. Doesn't acknowledge the nonsense they're working with
  26. Acts like their theory isn't polarizing
  27. Forgets or doesn't know Scott is making up the story
  28. Made for theatrics
  29. Jumping to conclusions
  30. Mis-interpretations of some kind
  31. Already been covered
  32. "I think/don't think"
  33. Video gets progressively more ridiculous
  34. No concept of Occam's Razor
  35. The Mimic
  36. Cassidy
  37. Over- reliance on pre-existing theories
  38. Remnant or Agony
  39. Uses past information for present lore & vice-versa
  40. Confuses symbolism with reality
  41. Unintentional overlap with other theories
  42. Majority of comment section agrees
  43. Head-canon
  44. William Afton
  45. Books mentioned (Bonus if there's entire excerpts!)
  46. Crying Child
  47. Bite of 83/87
  48. David