(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
“We almost gave up on this”
A reviewer requests more references
A statistical test is chosen post hoc
“We need more data”
A method is described as “robust”
“This is preliminary”
A figure legend is longer than the text
“Let’s discuss this offline”
A PhD student explains a senior author’s work
A method section references another paper for details
“We’ll fix it in revision”
Someone mentions resubmission
Coffee is treated as a research tool
Someone mentions sample storage issues
A collaboration is called “very productive”
A control experiment is added late
“This opens many new questions”
“The data speak for themselves”
A reviewer asks for an unrelated experiment
“We are underpowered”
“We don’t fully understand the mechanism”
Someone mentions impact factor
A dataset is described as “messy”
“Statistically significant” is emphasized
Someone mentions a rejected manuscript
A study is described as “proof of concept”
Someone says “It’s well known that…”
A timeline is described as “ambitious”
Someone says “In theory…”
Someone references Supplementary Figure 12
Someone mentions bioinformatics troubleshooting
A protocol is followed “with minor modifications”
A grant is described as “competitive”
“The sample size is limited”
An experiment is described as “tricky”
A lab meeting runs over time
A result is called “unexpected”
A figure was remade at the last minute
“Reviewer 2” is mentioned
Someone mentions lack of funding
“This is outside the scope of the study”
Someone mentions working on the weekend
“The results are reproducible… mostly”
A PI says “Interesting…”
A method only one person in the lab understands
A figure is described as “self-explanatory”
Someone mentions ethics approval delays
“Due to time constraints…”
A deadline is extended
“This will strengthen the paper”
A meeting could have been an email
Someone mentions batch effects
“This should be straightforward”
A hypothesis is refined after seeing the results
Funding agency acronym is used without explanation
