(Print) Use this randomly generated list as your call list when playing the game. There is no need to say the BINGO column name. Place some kind of mark (like an X, a checkmark, a dot, tally mark, etc) on each cell as you announce it, to keep track. You can also cut out each item, place them in a bag and pull words from the bag.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
A collaboration is called “very productive”
Someone references Supplementary Figure 12
A reviewer requests more references
Someone apologizes for too many slides
A hypothesis is refined after seeing the results
“We are underpowered”
Someone mentions batch effects
“We don’t fully understand the mechanism”
“The results are reproducible… mostly”
A figure legend is longer than the text
Someone says “In theory…”
An experiment is described as “tricky”
A figure is described as “self-explanatory”
A study is described as “proof of concept”
“We’ll fix it in revision”
A statistical test is chosen post hoc
Coffee is treated as a research tool
A dataset is described as “messy”
Someone says “It’s well known that…”
“This is preliminary”
A result is called “unexpected”
A figure was remade at the last minute
A negative result is called “interesting”
“This is outside the scope of the study”
“We need more data”
“It worked once”
“We almost gave up on this”
A timeline is described as “ambitious”
A lab meeting runs over time
Someone mentions ethics approval delays
A PI says “Interesting…”
“The data speak for themselves”
A PhD student explains a senior author’s work
A control experiment is added late
A grant is described as “competitive”
A method section references another paper for details
Funding agency acronym is used without explanation
